| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-18 16:33:37 | |
| | *** DENIED 5TH REVIEW ***** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE INPUT |
| | DATA REPORT IS BEING REVIEWED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT SUBMITTED WITH |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND BLACK BINDER WHICH WAS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED AS A RESUB AND ALSO THE NEW INPUT DATA REPORT |
| | SHEETS LEFT AFTER MEETING HELD ON 10/11/07 DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUMMARY SHEETS |
| | NOR DO EITHER ONE COORDINATE WITH THE PLANS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE SHEETS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED THIS IS THE FIRST ACTUAL REVIEW OF |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE IDR WHICH WAS RUN ON |
| | 4/25/07 UNDER THE 3.0 VERSION CONTAINS EXTERIOR |
| | LIGHTING FIXTURES HOWEVER THE SUMMARY SHEETS STATES |
| | *NONE ENTERED*. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE TYPE *M* FIXTURES FOR |
| | PARKING GARAGE WHICH ARE SHOWN AS 1000WATTS ON THE |
| | PLANS AND FIXTURE LEGEND ARE ONLY 455WATTS ON THE IDR. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE INPUT DATA REPORT DATED |
| | 9/11/07 DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES |
| | WHICH ARE NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CONTAIN NUMEROUS |
| | INCLUDING THE TYPE *M* AS NOTED ABOVE ALONG WITH |
| | MISSING TYPE *K*. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES |
| | *J* AND *JQ* WHICH ARE IN SERVICE BAY AREAS IN WHICH |
| | THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES ON PLANS ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE |
| | IDR. |
| | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE STAIRS (BOTH), HALLWAY |
| | AREA, VESTIBULE ETC WHICH THESE TOTAL NUMBER OF |
| | FIXTURES ON PLANS EXCEED THAT AS ON THE IDR. |
| | |
| | THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES. PLEASE GO THROUGH THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS, PLEASE RUN COMPLETE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | UNDER 2.11 (2004 FBC W/2005 REVISION). |
| | THIS OFFICE WILL REQUIRE BOTH THE SUMMARY SHEETS AND |
| | THE INPUT DATA SHEETS TO COORDINATE WITH THE DATES THEY |
| | HAVE BEEN RUN.\ |
| | 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3,13-103.1.1.1 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. THIS |
| | WILL BE A RE-SUBMITTAL AND THE RE-SUBMITTAL FEE OF 10% |
| | OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE WILL BE DUE. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |