| Date |
Text |
| 2007-03-14 16:26:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC EB |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. |
| | |
| | 2.)PROVIDE A SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY, FBC*106.3.4, |
| | SHOWING PROPERTY LINE AND ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT A SURVEY HAS BEEN |
| | INCLUDED BUT IT WAS NOT IN THE PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL |
| | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 4.)RADON FEES DUE, FS*553.721.SEE ATTACHED.THIS |
| | FEE MUST BE PAID WHEN THE PLANS ARE PICKED UP. |
| | |
| | 5.)DUE TO VALUATION ADJUSTMENT, FEES HAVE BEEN |
| | INCREASED.SEE ATTACHED.PLEASE PAY AT THE TIME THAT |
| | THE PLANS ARE PICKED UP. |
| | |
| | 6.)FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS REQUIRED IF SPRINKLERS ARE |
| | REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), |
| | FS553.79 (2), ATTACHED LETTER FROM DCA. |
| | |
| | THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS WERE IN THE PACKAGE, BUT THE |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR THE ENGINEER FAC61G15-23.002 |
| | IS NOT ON EACH SHEET, AND THE SEAL IS ILLEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | 7.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR |
| | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, |
| | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO |
| | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II |
| | CONSTRUCTION |
| | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS |
| | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE |
| | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI |
| | - PILE DRIVING |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS |
| | OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION |
| | SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: |
| | 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS |
| | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL |
| | SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. |
| | |
| | 8.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC1802.2.1, |
| | 1802.2.3.THREE SETS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | THE SIGNATURE FOR AN ENGINEER CANNOT BE A PHOTOCOPY, |
| | SEE FAC61G15-23.002, FS471.025. |
| | |
| | 9.)THE SEAL IS ILLEGIBLE (ARCHITECT).PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS, FS481.221. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED, |
| | BUT I STILL CANNOT READ THE SEAL. |
| | |
| | 10.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD.ONLY ONE |
| | FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED AND AN NOA |
| | FOR LOUVERS, WITHOUT THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION |
| | (EVALUATION REPORT, INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS) TO SHOW |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE AND FOR INSPECTIONS.THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS DID NOT HAVE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP. |
| | APPROVAL IS TO BE IN THE FORM OF A REVIEW STAMP OR A |
| | COVER LETTER SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO EACH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IN THE PACKAGE.STATING ?PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD? (A STATEMENT |
| | IN A TYPED RESPONSE LETTER WHICH IS NOT SIGNED AND |
| | GIVES NO INDICATION WHATSOEVER AS TO WHO PREPARED THE |
| | DOCUMENT; NO LETTERHEAD, NAME, SIGNATURE) DOES NOT SHOW |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE; IT DOESN?T STATE WHICH DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOR WHICH |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED, AND NOTHING SIGNED BY |
| | THE DESIGNER WHO REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 11.)INCLUDE FBC EB IN GOVERNING CODE.THIS PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENT IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC EB CHAPTER 9; SEE |
| | ALSO FBC EB 901.2.SOME COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATE TO THIS CODE SECTION. |
| | |
| | 12.)INCLUDE A CODE SUMMARY. DECLARE BUILDING TYPE |
| | FBC6 (INCLUDE A OR B), BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA FBC5, |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC 3 AND AREA PER OCCUPANCY, |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION.NOTE THAT CANOPIES AND |
| | EQUIPMENT SHEDS ARE TO BE INCLUDED, SEE FBC 502, |
| | DEFINITION OF AREA, BUILDING.BUILDING TYPE WILL BE |
| | BASED ON WORST CASE UNLESS A FIRE WALL SEPARATES THE |
| | BUILDING AREAS.DETAILS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWING |
| | FIRE RESISTANCE MAY BE REQUIRED.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF |
| | YOU ARE UNSURE OF WHICH DETAILS TO INCLUDE. |
| | |
| | THIS INFORMATION IS TO BE ON THE PLAN, NOT IN THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER.NOTE THAT THE RESPONSE LETTER IS NOT |
| | ON LETTERHEAD, AND DOES NOT INDICATE WHO PREPARED IT, |
| | AND IS UNSIGNED.PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, |
| | BUT IF LETTERS ARE ACCEPTED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE PLAN |
| | AT OTHER TIMES, THEY ARE TO MEET THE SAME REQUIREMENTS |
| | AS ANY DOCUMENT PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER |
| | AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD. |
| | |
| | |
| | A 2 HOUR WALL WAS ADDED ON THE PROPOSED SERVICE |
| | BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE HUMMER SHOWROOM.IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHAT DESIGN INTENT IS AS THIS DOES NOT COMPLY |
| | WITH FBC 705, OPENINGS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC705.8.IF |
| | YOU ARE USING AN ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN |
| | BUILDINGS, INFORMATION REGARDING THE HUMMER SHOWROOM |
| | AND THE VW CANOPY BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503, FBC TABLE 601, FBC TABLE |
| | 620, NO OPENINGS ALLOWED. THE SITE PLAN STILL SHOWS |
| | THIS AS ONE BUILDING.SHEET A102 SHOWS THE EQUIPMENT |
| | ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE BUILDING (ATTACHED), |
| | |
| | THIS LIST MAY NOT BE COMPLETE AS DESIGN INTENT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR.IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS TO BE SEPARATE |
| | BUILDINGS, BUT OPENINGS ARE SHOWN WITH NO INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDINGS WAS PROVIDED.IF THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDING IS TO BE SEPARATED FROM THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDINGS WITH A FIRE WALL, SEE FBC705 AND SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13.)REGARDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS, PLEASE SEE |
| | FBC304, FBC311.2, FBC311.3.OTHER CODE SECTIONS MAY |
| | APPLY. |
| | |
| | SEE ITEM 12 ABOVE.ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS TO BE |
| | ON THE PLAN.THE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS S1 AND S2, |
| | BUT IT SHOWS A VEHICLE SHOWROOM, FBC304.INFORMATION |
| | IN REGARDS TO THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS MUST BE PROVIDED |
| | TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 14.)WHAT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE STORED AND IN |
| | WHAT QUANTITIES?SEE FBC TABLE 307.7(1), FBC 406.6. |
| | |
| | ADDRESS THIS IN THE PLAN.PROVIDE MSDS FOR THE |
| | HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | 15.)DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THE OIL |
| | STORAGE, SEE FBC TABLE 307.7(1), FBC406.6.NOTE |
| | QUANTITIES. |
| | |
| | THIS IS TO BE DONE ON THE PLAN; DECLARE OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION AND QUANTITIES.THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT THIS IS S1, PLEASE STATE QUANTITY OF |
| | MAXIMUM HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORED ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 16.)SHOW HOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503 HAS BEEN |
| | ACCOMPLISHED; SEE ALSO FBC 302.IF HEIGHT OR AREA |
| | MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN USED AS PER FBC 503 THROUGH |
| | 508, PUT ALL INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS ON THE PLAN. |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED SHOULD BE CLEAR IN REGARDS TO |
| | BUILDING TYPE, BUILDING AREA, AND OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION IN REGARDS TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS |
| | (INCLUDING AREAS REFERRED TO AS "CANOPY" AND |
| | "EQUIP.SHED", ETC.) AS WELL AS THE NEW IMPROVEMENT. |
| | |
| | THIS IS TO BE DONE ON THE PLAN.SEE OTHER COMMENTS; |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 17.)IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE EXISTING SERVICE |
| | SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE MSP-1 WILL BE A PART OF THE NEW |
| | BUILDING (APPEARS TO BE ATTACHED AT THE NORTHWEST |
| | PORTION, THE REST OF THE EXISTING SERVICE IS ALONG THE |
| | RAMP) OR IF IT A SEPARATE BUILDING, TO BE SEPARATED |
| | WITH AN ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.IF THIS IS A SEPARATE |
| | BUILDING, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 BY SHOWING |
| | THE BUILDING TYPE AND OCCUPANCY, ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE, |
| | DISTANCE OF EACH BUILDING FROM THE ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINE.COMPLIANCE FOR EACH BUILDING MUST BE SHOWN, |
| | INCLUDING FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | IF THIS IS NOT A SEPARATE BUILDING, INCLUDE THIS |
| | BUILDING IN THE CODE SUMMARY, SEE ITEM 3. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS |
| | A SEPARATE BUILDING, BUT NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AS |
| | REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 18.)SEPARATIONS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 302.3.2. |
| | AS NO FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION OR FBC TABLE 503 |
| | COMPLIANCE WAS PROVIDED, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE 2 HOUR |
| | SHOWN BETWEEN B AND S1 IS CORRECT. |
| | |
| | INCLUDE SPRINKLER INFORMATION IN A CODE SUMMARY.THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER AND PLAN SHOWS THAT THE PROPOSED GARAGE |
| | WILL BE SPRINKLERED.ARE THE OTHER BUILDINGS FULLY |
| | SPRINKLERED, INCLUDING THE CANOPY AREA, EQUIPMENT SHED, |
| | ETC.?IF THIS IS TWO BUILDING SEPARATED AS PER FBC |
| | TABLE 602, BOTH BUILDINGS MUST COMPLY AND NO OPENINGS |
| | ALLOWED FBC TABLE 704.8. |
| | |
| | 19.)NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONS WERE SHOWN. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL REQUIRED SEPARATIONS; BETWEEN S1 AND |
| | THE PARKING GARAGE FBC406.2.7.PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 20.)PROVIDE DISTANCE OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS TO THE |
| | PROPOSED RENOVATED BUILDING.FOR INSTANCE, DISTANCE |
| | FROM USED CARS TO HUMMER SHOWROOM, USED CARS TO |
| | EXISTING SERVICE.CONNECTING MULTIPLE BUILDINGS MAY |
| | AFFECT BUILDING TYPE FBC5, WHICH MAY AFFECT CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602.PROVIDE INFORMATION IN |
| | REGARDS TO OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND BUILDING TYPE |
| | FOR OTHER STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | SEE OTHER COMMENTS.DESIGN INTENT IS NOT CLEAR. THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS A |
| | SEPARATE STRUCTURE, BUT IT SHOWS OPENINGS WHICH ARE NOT |
| | ALLOWED FBC TABLE 704.8 AND NO INFORMATION PROVIDED IN |
| | REGARDS TO THE OTHER BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 21.)MSP-1, BUILDING/LOT COVERAGE ZONING INFORMATION |
| | REFERS TO AN EXISTING LEVITZ BUILDING BUT THAT BUILDING |
| | IS NOT REFERENCED ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER REQUESTS THAT I SPEAK WITH |
| | PLANNING.THE PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE BUILDINGS ON |
| | THE SITE AS REQUESTED IN OTHER COMMENTS.THE CODE |
| | SUMMARY PROVIDED IS TO CORRELATE WITH THE BUILDING |
| | NAMES ON THE SITE PLAN.FOR INSTANCE, THE SITE PLAN |
| | STATES THAT EXISTING LEVITZ BUILDING IS 62,399 SQUARE |
| | FEET, BUT THERE IS NOTHING LABELED LEVITZ BUILDING ON |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 22.)WHAT IS BETWEEN THE PROPOSED SERVICE/PARKING AND |
| | EXISTING VW SERVICE/VW SHOWROOM? |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THERE ARE EXISTING |
| | CANOPIES.THIS AREA IS CONSIDERED TO BE BUILDING AREA. |
| | SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING BUILDING SEPARATION AND |
| | OPENINGS.SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT |
| | THIS IS CONSIDERED ONE BUILDING OR SEPARATE BUILDINGS |
| | AS THE PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 23.)A101 AND OTHER DETAILS, STAIR DOORS A132, A2-03, |
| | A303, SEE FBC11-4.13 AND FBC FIGURE 11-26, TWO HINGED |
| | DOORS IN A SERIES. |
| | |
| | THIS WAS ADDRESSED ON MOST PAGES.PLEASE ALSO REVISE |
| | THE MECHANICAL SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 24.)A111E, DOOR TO MENS LOCKER, SHOW MANEUVERING |
| | SPACE, PULL SIDE, FBC11 FIGURE 25. |
| | |
| | THIS SHEET IS NO LONGER IN THE PLAN.WAS THIS A |
| | DETAILED FLOOR PLAN?PROVIDE OLD SHEETS WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | 25.)MSP-1 SHOWS A PROPOSED PHASE 2 OF PARKING |
| | STRUCTURE.NOTE THAT ONLY THE CURRENT IMPROVEMENT IS |
| | UNDER REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 26.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 27.)MSP-1, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC WAY IS |
| | SHOWN FBC11-4.1.2(1), SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS HAS BEEN REVIEWED |
| | UNDER PRIOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS.THIS PLAN IS TO SHOW |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE.PLEASE ADDRESS THE COMMENT AS |
| | REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 28.)PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | SERVICE/PARKING GARAGE BUILDING, ALL FLOORS SHOWING |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE AND EXITS, EGRESS COMPONENT WIDTHS, |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD, DISTANCE APART |
| | OF REQUIRED EXITS, ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION TO |
| | DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE.THE EXIT DISCHARGE IS TO |
| | BE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING, INCLUDING OUTSIDE OF |
| | THE CANOPY COVERED AREAS, AND TRAVEL DISTANCE IS TO |
| | INCLUDE TRAVEL THROUGH THESE AREAS IF THIS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION.THE LIFE |
| | SAFETY PLAN PROVIDED DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL OF THE ABOVE |
| | INFORMATION.NO OCCUPANT LOAD WAS PROVIDED, AND THE |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE IS SHOWN TO THE CANOPY AREA.TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE IS TO BE TO THE OUTSIDE, NOT TO THE BUILDING |
| | AREA OF AN ADJACENT BUILDING.AS NO OPENINGS WOULD BE |
| | ALLOWED WITH A 0? TO 3? BUILDING SEPARATION (SEE FBC, |
| | THE OPEN AREA LEADING TO THE CANOPY WOULD ALSO NOT BE |
| | ALLOWED.A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE PERFORMED UNTIL |
| | DESIGN INTENT IS CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 29.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 30.)THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING |
| | ON THE WEST SIDE.INCLUDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWING |
| | HOW EGRESS WILL BE AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER PARTIALLY ADDRESSES THIS COMMENT. |
| | PLEASE INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN. |
| | PLEASE SHOW MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE |
| | BUILDING; SHOW THAT IT IS NOT THROUGH THE SIDE ADJACENT |
| | TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE BUILDING AND PARKING |
| | STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | 31.)PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE EXISTING |
| | HUMMER BUILDING, FIRST FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR (2 HOUR |
| | WALL SHOWN ON 2ND FLOOR) IF APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER PARTIALLY ADDRESSES THIS COMMENT. |
| | PLEASE INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN. |
| | PLEASE SHOW MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE EXISTING HUMMER |
| | BUILDING; SHOW THAT IT IS NOT THROUGH THE CANOPY AREA. |
| | IF IT IS, AS YOU ARE CLOSING OFF THE CANOPY AREA, THAT |
| | DISTANCE MUST BE ADDED TO THE TRAVEL DISTANCE. |
| | |
| | 32.)A FOLDING PARTITION IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IN THE |
| | MEZZANINE/TRAINING AREA.DOES THIS PARTITION CLOSE? IT |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH EGRESS DOOR REQUIREMENTS, |
| | FBC1008.1.2, PLEASE ADDRESS.IF IT DOES NOT CLOSE, PUT |
| | THAT REQUIREMENT ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | THE PARTITION WAS REMOVED FROM MOST SHEETS BUT STILL |
| | APPEARS ON THE MECHANICAL PAGES.PLEASE CHECK ALL |
| | SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 33.)STATE WHETHER THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS AN OPEN |
| | PARKING GARAGE OR ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE, STATE IN THE |
| | CODE SUMMARY, FBC406, AND SEE ALL REQUIREMENTS, SHOW ON |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | PLEASE INCORPORATE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN AS |
| | REQUESTED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES TO SEE ITEM 12 |
| | FOR THE CODE SUMMARY, BUT REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED.PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 34.)PROVIDE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GUARD, |
| | FBC1607.7, FBC1012. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WILL BE DONE |
| | THROUGH SHOP DRAWINGS.DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS AND DESIGN CRITERIA AS REQUESTED |
| | FBC*106.1.1. |
| | |
| | 35.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 36.)WHAT IS THE 3FT4IN DIMENSION SHOWN AT THE STAIR, |
| | #303 AND 203?IT APPEARS TO BE AN OPENING, NOT ALLOWED |
| | IN A VERTICAL EXIT.PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | THIS WAS REMOVED FROM MOST SHEETS BUT STILL APPEARS ON |
| | THE MECHANICAL SHEETS.PLEASE ADDRESS AND MAKE ALL |
| | SHEETS CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 37.)A101, ROOF PLAN, 2ND FLOOR PLAN, STORAGE IS SHOWN |
| | WITH AN OPENING INTO THE STAIR.SEE 1019.1.1, OPENINGS |
| | TO BE LIMITED TO THOSE NECESSARY FOR EXIT ACCESS FROM |
| | NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES. |
| | |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES, ?THIS SPACE IS A FREQUENTLY |
| | VISITED STORAGE AREA.OPENINGS TO EXIT STAIR SHOULD BE |
| | ALLOWED.?PLEASE SHOW IN THE CODE WHERE THIS IS |
| | ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 38.)FIRE EXIT, FIRST FLOOR, TO HAVE SEPARATION FROM |
| | THE OCCUPANCY ABOVE IF AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS |
| | REQUIRED.GG-A108. |
| | |
| | AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR GARAGES, |
| | FBC406.2.7.FBC302.3.1 STATES THAT FIRE SEPARATIONS |
| | ARE NOT REQUIRED BETWEEN USES, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | OTHER PROVISIONS.YOUR RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT YOU |
| | HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENT, BUT |
| | COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN.PLEASE SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 39.)DECLARE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION, FBC TABLE |
| | 803.5. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 40.)THE LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA SHOWS A 2 HOUR |
| | SEPARATION, NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATION.IF THE OCCUPANCY |
| | SEPARATION IS REQUIRED, HORIZONTAL SEPARATION ALSO |
| | REQUIRED, PROVIDE CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC7 OR |
| | TESTED ASSEMBLY, FLOOR AND CEILING. |
| | |
| | WHAT IS THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OF THE |
| | LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA?PLEASE SEE FBC302.ALSO PROVIDE |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS AREA.SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 41.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 42.)ADDRESSED.PLEASE INCLUDE OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1607.1 CAN BE |
| | DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 43.)NO EXIT LIGHTS SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR OR ROOF, |
| | FBC1006.3. |
| | |
| | 44.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 45.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY CALC, |
| | FBC13. |
| | |
| | THIS HAS BEEN DONE, BUT IF THE ENERGY CALCS CHANGE |
| | THROUGH THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, PLEASE SIGN NEW ENERGY |
| | CALCS. |
| | |
| | 46-49.)THESE COMMENTS RELATE TO PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WHICH WERE NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 50.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 51.)ADDRESSED ON A201, SHEET A200 NO LONGER IN THE |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 52.)PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS.NO PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 53.)THE SIGNATURE FOR AN ENGINEER CANNOT BE A STAMP |
| | (STRUCTURAL ENGINEER), SEE FAC61G15-23.002, FS471.025. |
| | |
| | 54.)PLEASE CLOUD ALL CHANGES AND SUBMIT OLD SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH |
| | ITEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
