| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-03 13:42:21 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 06090366 |
| | ADD: 221 CLEMATIS ST SUITE 201 & 202 |
| | CONT: CASTLE FLORIDA |
| | TEL: (561)856-6655 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2NDREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1) FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS |
| | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. |
| | |
| | 2) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3A)2ND REQUEST, PLANS INDICAE A CODE SUMMARY A TYPE |
| | II-BBUILDING SPRINKLERED AND A ASSEMBLY GROUP A-2. |
| | TABLE 503 A-2 TYPE II-B ALLOWABLE AREA IS 9,500 SQ FT 2 |
| | STORIES. PLANS INDICATE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING |
| | AS 21,213 SQ FT. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT AREA AND OR HEIGHT INCREASES THAT |
| | YOU MAY TAKE, ALSO NOTE THIS ISCONSIDERED A (4) STORY |
| | BUILDING, THE |
| | 3RD AND 4TH FLOORS BEING PROPOSED A BUSINESS |
| | OCCUPANCY.TABLE 503, 504.2 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER |
| | INCREASES. |
| | |
| | 3B)(1)PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN OF THE TOTAL |
| | FIRST FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR OF THIS ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCY. PLEASE INDICATE OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL AREAS |
| | OF THE FLOOR, EXAMPLE BARS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS A |
| | STANDING SPACE 5 NET, DANCE FLOORS 7 NET, TABLE AND |
| | CHAIRS 15 NET, POOL TABLES 15 NET, FIXED SEATING 1004.7 |
| | AND PROVIDE A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD.PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | EXISTING SUITE 202 IS CONSIDERED A MEZANINE SEE 1004.6 |
| | AS HOW TO HANDLE THE OCCUPANT LOADS, WHERE THIS |
| | ADDITIONALOCCUPANT LOAD WILL DISCHARGE THROUGH. ALSO |
| | INDICATE THE DISPERSAL OF THE OCCUPANT LOAD, PROVIDE |
| | ALLOWABLE OCCUPANT LOADS FOR DOORWAYS AND STAIRS. TABLE |
| | 1005.1.NOTE THE BOTTLE NECKING EFFECT AT ELEVATOR LOBBY |
| | TO SUITE # 202. |
| | |
| | 3B)(2)THERE IS ANOTHER ISSUE TO BE CONCERNED WITH, |
| | THE OCCUPANCY LOAD OF THE NIGHTCLUB, IF OVER 300 1609.5 |
| | THE IMPORTANCE FACTOR |
| | OF THE BUILDING . THE BUILDING BECOMES A |
| | BUILDING CATEGORY III, THE IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF |
| | 1.15.PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING WIND INFORMATION. |
| | 2004 FL. BLD CODE 1603.1.4 THE |
| | FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND |
| | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION |
| | DRAWINGS, |
| | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH |
| | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING |
| | CATEGORY |
| | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE |
| | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, |
| | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN WIND |
| | PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. |
| | |
| | 3C)(1) PLEASE NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE EXITS AT |
| | THE REAR OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY WAY. OUR |
| | JOBSITE MEETING (LAST |
| | WEEK OF DEC) REVEALED THE WEST EXIST STAIRS |
| | TO HAVE SEVERAL CODE VIOLATIONS: |
| | (1) THE EXIT DOOR TO THE STAIRWAY SWUNG INTO THE |
| | STAIRWELL, OCCUPANT LOAD > 50. |
| | (2) THERE APPEARED TO BE A KITHEN EXHAUST DUCK |
| | CUT INTO THE EXIT. |
| | (3) THERE ALSO WAS A VESTIBULE AREA DIRECTLY |
| | BEHIND THE STAIRWELL THE |
| | EXHAUST DUCK DUMPED INTO, THERE IS ANOTHER |
| | EXIT DOOR NOT DETERMINED |
| | WHERE IS AN EXIT FROM |
| | (4 THE STAIRWELL WAS NOT TRUELY FIRE RATED. (5) |
| | THERE WAS WINDOWS ON THE PROPERTY LINE. (6) AT |
| | THE TOP OF THE STAIRWAY NO DOOR OR ENCLOSURE. |
| | (7) IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS PLUMBING 6"OR 8" AT |
| | THE TOP OF THE LANDING |
| | (8) ALSO STAIRS TO THE MEZZANINE LEVEL ALSO HAD |
| | ISSUES WITH |
| | ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS RUNNING THROUGH THE |
| | STAIRWELL. |
| | (9) THERE ALSO APPEARS TO BE HEIGTH PROBLEMS, |
| | MINIMUM HEADROOM |
| | (10) NO EXIT LIGTS OR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS |
| | |
| | 3C()2) THE STAIRWELL TO THE EAST END OF THE ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCY SUITE# 202ALSO HAD SEVERAL CODE VIOLATIONS |
| | : |
| | (1) STORAGE IN THE STAIRWELL |
| | (2) ELECTRIC PANELS AT EACH FLOOR LEVEL |
| | (3) NO APPROVED EXIT LIGHTING, OR DIRECTIONAL |
| | SIGNS |
| | (4) THE EXIT DOOR ALSO SWINGS OUT OVER THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. |
| | (5) IT APPEARS THERE IS ALSO PLUMBING IN THE |
| | STAIRWELL. |
| | |
| | 4) WILL REFER BACK TO 3A) FOR ANSWER. |
| | |
| | 5)2ND REQUEST, W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3* |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH |
| | ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | INDICATES PRESSURES OF +52/-58 ON |
| | SHEET A-4 WHERE AS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS APPROVED FOR |
| | A DESIGN LOAD OF +30/-30? |
| | |
| | 6) 2ND REQUEST, FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED AT |
| | TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION,IF THE BUILDING IS |
| | DESIGNED |
| | AS A FIRE SPRINKLERED BUILDING AND THE AREA INCREASES |
| | THAT ARE TAKEN IN TABLE 503 AND 504.2.. THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD |
| | WILL DESIGN A SYSTEM AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED, SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS |
| | WILL BE SUBMITTED AT THAT TIME. FL S S 553.79(2) |
| | WHENEVER FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PLANS ARE REQUIRED, THEN THE DESIGN OF THOSE |
| | SYSTEMS |
| | MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 7)2ND REQUEST, THE OCCUPANT LOAD TO BE DETERMINED |
| | USING THE INFORMATION LISTED IN COMMENT 3B)(1) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 8A) 2ND REQUEST, FOR PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | OVERHEAD |
| | |
| | DOORS. PLANS MAY INDICATE LARGE MISSLE RATED GLASS, BUT |
| | THE |
| | PRODUCT SUBMITTED |
| | STATES THE SYSTEM BUILT AND TESTED DOES NOT HAVE LARGE |
| | MISSLE |
| | TESTING.1609.1.4(1) PROTECTION OF OPENINGS , GLAZED |
| | OPENINGS |
| | LOCATED WITHIN 30FEET OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | THE LARGE MISSLE TEST. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED |
| | TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| | INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 8B) THERE ARE OTHER CRITERIA TO BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | BEFORE THIS PRODUCT CAN BE APPROVED FOR USE IN THIS |
| | BUILDING. |
| | CLOPAY SHEET W5 HAS TWO DESIGN CRITEREA TO CONSIDER, |
| | THIS REPORT |
| | INDICATES FOR A 140 MPH WIND ZONE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT |
| | OF 30' AND AN |
| | IPORTANCE FACTOR OF 1.0. COMMENTS 3B((1) AND 3B)(2) |
| | BOTH REFER BACK TO THIS ISSUE. |
| | THE SECOND ISSUE THIS BEING A 4 STORY BUILDING IS |
| | HEIGHT, ONCE ABOVE 30' THERE |
| | ARE MULTIPLIERS THAT EFFECT THE PRESSURES, THE BASIC |
| | WIND PRESSURES WILL SHOW AN |
| | INCREASEABOVE THE BASE TABLE IN 1609..6.B. THERE IS A |
| | HEIGHT MULTIPLIER PLUS THE IMPORTANCE MULTIPLIER!!!!! |
| | |
| | 8C)THE OVERHEADDOOR IN THE OPEN POSITION NEEDS TO |
| | COMPLY WITH 2405 SLOPED GLAZING. |
| | 2405.2 ALLOWABLE GLAZING MATERIALS AND LIMITATIONS. |
| | SLOPED GLAZING SHALL BE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS, |
| | SUBJECT TO THE LISTED LIMITATIONS. |
| | 1.FOR MONOLITHIC GLAZING SYSTEMS, THE GLAZING |
| | MATERIAL OF THE SINGLE LIGHT OR LAYER SHALL BE |
| | LAMINATED GLASS WITH A MINIMUM 30-MIL (0.76 MM) |
| | POLYVINYL BUTYRAL (OR EQUIVALENT) INTERLAYER, WIRED |
| | GLASS, LIGHT-TRANSMITTING PLASTIC MATERIALS MEETING THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 2607 , HEAT-STRENGTHENED GLASS |
| | OR FULLY TEMPERED GLASS. |
| | 2.FOR MULTIPLE-LAYER GLAZING SYSTEMS, EACH LIGHT |
| | OR LAYER SHALL CONSIST OF ANY OF THE GLAZING MATERIALS |
| | SPECIFIED IN ITEM 1 ABOVE. |
| | ANNEALED GLASS IS PERMITTED TO BE USED AS SPECIFIED |
| | WITHIN EXCEPTIONS 2 AND 3 OF SECTION 2405.3 . |
| | FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PLASTIC SKYLIGHTS, SEE |
| | SECTION 2610 . GLASS-BLOCK CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM |
| | TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 2101.2.5 . |
| | |
| | 8D) THE ENERGY FORMS NEED TO REFLECT THIS OPENING ON |
| | THE SOUTH WALL, WITH THE DOORS OPEN, AND WHEN THE DOORS |
| | ARE CLOSED |
| | THE TYPE OF DOOR ,IT IS NOT A PAPER HONEYCOMB FILLED |
| | CORE TYPE OF DOOR!!!!!! |
| | NOTE THE FIRST FLOOR DOOR IS ALSO A PAIR OF DOORS NOT A |
| | 3'-0" X 7'-0"DOOR. |
| | |
| | 8E)DETAIL4 SHEET A-3 INDICATES THE NEW OVERHEAD |
| | DOORS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE THICKNESS OF THE BEAM BELOW |
| | AND THE CLOSENESS OF THE WINDOWS BELOW, FIRST FLOOR |
| | WINDOWS. SHEET A-4 INDICATES THE FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS |
| | BUT THE TRANSOMS ABOVE THE WINDOWS DO NOT APPEAR. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH 704.9 VERTICAL SEPERATION.OF OPENINGS.IF USING |
| | EXCEPTION# 2 AGAIN A COMPLETE SET OF FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | PLANS FOR THE"BUILDING" WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED FOR |
| | THIS EXCEPTION!!!!! |
| | |
| | 9) GUARDRAILS, THE RESPONCE SHOWS A DETAIL 4/ A-3, THIS |
| | NEW DETAIL INDICATES A NEW SLAB DETAIL 1'-0" THICK, NO |
| | STEEL INFORMATION, |
| | HOW FAR OUT THE SLAB OR HANDRAILPROTRUDE FROM THE |
| | BUILDING OR IF THEY ARE OVER THE PROPERTY LINE? |
| | 3202.3.2 WINDOWS, BALCONIES, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES AND |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. |
| | WHERE THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE GRADE TO PROJECTING |
| | WINDOWS, BALCONIES, ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES OR |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS MORE THAN 8 FEET (2438 MM), 1 |
| | INCH (25 MM) OF ENCROACHMENT IS PERMITTED FOR EACH |
| | ADDITIONAL 1 INCH (25 MM) OF CLEARANCE ABOVE 8 FEET |
| | (2438 MM), BUT THE MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT SHALL BE 4 FEET |
| | (1219 MM). |
| | |
| | 10) 2ND REQUEST, GUARDRAIL DETAIL 4/ A-3 INDICATES A |
| | HANDRAIL DETAILIS TO SHOW THE MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE EDGE OF SLAB. |
| | RESPONCE INDICATES 4" IN LETTER BUT NO COMMENT ON THE |
| | PLANS!!! |
| | |
| | 11) 2ND REQUEST, VERTICAL ACCESSIBLITY BETWEEN SUITE |
| | 201 & 202. PLANS INDICATE A LIFT, MUST NOT EMPEDE |
| | EGRESS ON STAIRS. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE |
| | LIFT.11-4.1.6.(1)(K)(III). |
| | 11-4.11 PLATFORM LIFTS (WHEELCHAIR LIFTS). 11-4.11.1 |
| | LOCATION. |
| | PLATFORM LIFTS (WHEELCHAIR LIFTS) PERMITTED BY SECTION |
| | 11-4.1 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 11-4.11 . |
| | 11-4.11.2 OTHER REQUIREMENTS. |
| | IF PLATFORM LIFTS (WHEELCHAIR LIFTS) ARE USED, THEY |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 11-4.2.4 , 11-4.5 , 11-4.27 |
| | , AND ASME A17.1, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND |
| | ESCALATORS , SECTION XX, 1990. |
| | 11-4.11.3 ENTRANCE. |
| | IF PLATFORM LIFTS ARE USED THEN THEY SHALL FACILITATE |
| | UNASSISTED ENTRY, OPERATION, AND EXIT FROM THE LIFT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.11.2 . |
| | |
| | 12)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 14) THE PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR ON THE HANDRAIL AND LIFT |
| | ARE TO COMBINE TO CREATE A OPENING FOR THE LIFT? |
| | |
| | 15) RESPONCE STATES THE METAL CLAD DOOR (90 MIN RATING) |
| | IS TO ONLY BE AESTHETIC VALUE TO THE PROJECT, BUT THE |
| | FIELD MEETING |
| | INDICATED ON SLOW NIGHTS THIS AREA WILL BE CLOSED OFF, |
| | HOW WILL THIS OCCUR? WILL EACH AREA EVER BE OPENED |
| | SEPERATELY, |
| | SUITE 202 IS CLOSED THERE WILL BE NO VERTICAL MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS? |
| | |
| | 16) POSSIBLY COMPLIED DEPENDING ON COMMENT RESPONCE |
| | 15. |
| | |
| | 17) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 18) 2ND REQUEST,CORRIDOR 110 WILL HAVE ISSUES. THIS |
| | MAY TRUELY BE A CORRIDOR OR IT MAY END UP BEING |
| | DESIGNED AS A PART OF AN EXIT |
| | PASSAGEWAY. IF THE DESIGN IS A CORRIDORTHE ELECTRICAL |
| | ROOM DOOR WOULD BE ALLOWED. IF DESIGNED AS PART OF THE |
| | EXIT PASSAGE WAY |
| | NO ELECTRICAL ROOM DOOR CAN BE IN THIS EXIT. NOTE ALSO |
| | FROM THE JOBSITE MEETING THE ELECTRIC ROOM DOOR NEEDS |
| | TO SWING OUT OF THE |
| | ELECTRICAL ROOM. |
| | |
| | 19) 2ND REQUEST, HOW MANY STORIES ARE IN THE BUILDING? |
| | A 1 HR CORRIDOR IS SHOWN. THE RESPONCE STATES THE AREA |
| | WHERE WORK IS TO OCCUR IS TWO STORIES. PLANS INDICATE |
| | IN SUITE 202 THE WALL OFTHE MENS RESTROOM THAT BACKS UP |
| | TO THE 4 STORY STAIR TOWER DOES SHOW A 1 HR RATING |
| | WHERE THERE SHOULD BE A 2 HR RATING . SHAFTS SEE |
| | SECTION 707. |
| | |
| | 20) ELECTRICAL ROOM 108 AS DISCUSSED IN THE JOBSITE |
| | MEETING THIS DORR DOES NEED TO BE MOVED BEWARE OF THE |
| | DOOR SWINNG AND THE CLEAR SPACE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | CORRIDOR. NOTE ALSO : 008.1.8.8 |
| | DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | LEAVE UNOBSTRUCTED AT LEAST ONE HALF OF THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY, OR LANDING, |
| | NOR PROJECT MORE THAN 7 INCHES (178 MM) INTO THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY OR |
| | LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN. |
| | |
| | 21) 2ND REQUEST, PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO EXIT |
| | DISCHARGE? RESPONCE EXIT DIRECTION IS NOW SHOWN ON |
| | 1/A-1. PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE EXIT AT THE FIRST FLOOR. |
| | THE JOB MEETING CLEARLY INDICATES PROBLEM AREAS AT BOTH |
| | THE EAST AND WEST EXITS. SEE COMMENT # 3. |
| | |
| | 22) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 23) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 24) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 25) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR ON THE NEXT REVIEW AS A |
| | RESULT TO COMMENT RESPONCE TO THIS REVIEW AND NEW |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
