| Date |
Text |
| 2006-09-26 00:00:00 | |
| | |
| | NONCOMPLIANT |
| | |
| | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS |
| | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 1} SHOW THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF ALL |
| | SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PLAN SO THAT |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 230.70(A)(1) CAN BE |
| | REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | 2} THE EQUIPMENT GROUND RAN FROM THE |
| | METER TO THE PANEL IS IN VIOLATION OF |
| | 250.6. NOTE THAT THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE |
| | SYSTEM IS ESTABLISHED AT THE FIRST MEANS |
| | OF DISCONNECT, ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDS |
| | SHALL BE RAN FROM THAT POINT. |
| | |
| | 3} PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER ARTICLE |
| | 220.31 OR STANDARD CALCULATION IF |
| | REDUCING THE NEUTRAL SIZE. |
| | |
| | 4} THE RANGE(CIRCUIT #11/13)OVERCURRENT |
| | SIZE IS TOO LARGE FOR THE CONDUCTOR (#8) |
| | PER 310.16, AND FOR THE 8KW LOAD. |
| | |
| | 5} PLEASE SEE THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | REQUIRES A SMOKE DETECTOR IN THE |
| | EXISTING BEDROOM UNDER LEVEL 2 |
| | ALTERATIONS, ARTICLE 604.4.3. THAT |
| | DETECTOR MUST BE INTERCONNECTED PER |
| | R313.1.1, IF THE EXEPTIION PROVISION |
| | EXISTS. |
| | |
| | 6} THE ENGINEER WHOSE NAME APPEARS ON |
| | THE TITLE BLOCK MUST SIGN, DATE AND SEAL |
| | THE DOCUMENT. 61G15-23.002 FAC. |
| | |
| | NOTE: THERE ARE NUMEROUS INSTANCES IN |
| | THE PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATING #12 |
| | CONDUCTORS ON 15 AMP BREAKERS. WHILE |
| | THIS IS NOT A CODE VIOLATION, IF IT IS |
| | INDICATED ON THE PLAN IT MUST ACTUALLY |
| | BE INSTALLED THAT WAY OR THE PLANS |
| | REVISED TO INDICATE ACTUAL CONDITIONS. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY. |
| | |
| | ONLY TWO SETS OF PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR |
| | REVIEW, FOUR WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW |
| | ONES, SUBMIT OLD SHEETS TO EXPEDITE |
| | REVIEW AND SUBMIT WRITTEN RESPONSE TO |
| | THE COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. |
| | |
| | BILL TROBAUGH |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561/805-6718 |
| | [email protected] |
