| Date |
Text |
| 2006-11-27 15:16:02 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: |
| | |
| | 1- PAY IMPACT FEES TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. BRING BACK |
| | STAMPED PLANS AND PAID RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 2- SOIL TEST REPORT: |
| | A) BOTH COPIES TO HAVE ORIGINAL ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE |
| | (NO COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA |
| | STATUTES. |
| | |
| | B) NEED THE ENGINEERING FIRM CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SEC. 61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72 |
| | FOR: |
| | A) FRENCH DOOR. DADE COUNTY NOA #01-0417.04 |
| | SUBMITTEDEXPIRED ON 11-22-06. |
| | |
| | B) PRECAST LINTELS. NO INFORMATION SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | C) ROOF TILE. NO INFORMATION SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | D) FLAT ROOF SYSTEMS. SEE PLANS. NO INFORMATION |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | ***NOTE: NEED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLIES. |
| | CHECK SYSTEM LIMITATIONS BECAUSE GENERAL LIMITATION #9 |
| | MAY NOT BE USED IN THIS AREA. IF SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #7, THEN PROVIDE REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION. SEE LAST PAGE OF NOA TO CHECK GENERAL |
| | LIMITATIONS. |
| | |
| | E) ALL USP OR SIMPSON CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | F) WINDOWS WERE REVISED FROM CASEMENT WINDOWS TO |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS.ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGES WERE SUBMITTED. NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | WINDOW DRAWINGS PACKAGE ALSO. |
| | |
| | 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOSIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 5-DETAIL A/A3 DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. R311.5.3.2 |
| | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. 7" RISERS AND 12" DON'T |
| | COMPLY WITH THE 24 TO 25 RISER TREAD RATIO. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET A-4:CLARIFY WHY TREAD DIMENSIONS ON STAIRS |
| | BY BREAKFAST AREAARE DIFFERENT FROM TREAD DIMENSIONS |
| | ON OTHER STAIRS. ALSO, COORDINATE DIMENSIONS WITH |
| | DETAIL A/A3 REVISION. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET A-5: |
| | A) WIND LOAD SCHEDULE CHART IS INCOMPLETE. IT |
| | DOESN'T SPECIFY THE WIND LOAD FOR THIS AREA AND THE |
| | EXPOSURE TYPE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE.ALSO, MISSING THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR FLAT |
| | ROOF. SEE TABLE 1609.6B FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE DOESN'T MATCH |
| | INFORMATION GIVEN ON SHEET A-8 WALL SECTION "A". REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECS FOR RAILING, |
| | INCLUDING FASTENING TO ROOF SYSTEM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 1607.7.1 FBC 2004 AND SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | INFORMATION NO PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 10- WALL SECTION "A" ON SHEET A-8 DOENS'T SHOW OR |
| | SPECIFY ATTIC VENTILATION. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
