| Date |
Text |
| 2006-09-09 00:00:00 | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW 1ST |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1) 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT |
| | DOORS. |
| | MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS |
| | THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED |
| | SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIGURE 11-25 . THE |
| | FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| | CLEARANCES SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR. |
| | MINIMUM CLARENCE IS 18". SEE PREP ROOM |
| | DOOR. SHEET A-2. |
| | |
| | 2) DOOR ENCROACHMENT |
| | 1005.2 DOOR ENCROACHMENT . |
| | DOORS OPENING INTO THE PATH OF EGRESS |
| | TRAVEL SHALL NOT REDUCE THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF DURING THE |
| | COURSE OF THE SWING. WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| | THE DOOR SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 7 |
| | INCHES (178 MM) INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) 110.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, |
| | INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED FOR RECORD |
| | KEEPING & FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: |
| | |
| | A) THE DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD, SEE 1004. |
| | ------------------------------------- |
| | |
| | 4) 106.1.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| | BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN UPON SUITABLE |
| | MATERIAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED |
| | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY |
| | TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN |
| | DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, |
| | AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | (SEE ALSO SECTION 106.3.5). THE SYMBOL |
| | IN THE LEGEND FOR THE 1-HR RATED |
| | PARTITION LOOKS THE SAME FOR THE |
| | EXISTING AND NEW 1-HR RATED WALL. THE |
| | NEW RATED WALL NEEDS TO BE DESTINTIVE |
| | FROM THE EXISTING RATED WALL, SO WE CAN |
| | IDENTIFY THE NEW 1-HR RATED WALLS. |
| | |
| | 5) ON PAGES A-5 AND A-6 THE NEW WALLS |
| | NEED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFY FROM THE |
| | EXISTING WALLS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IS LOW. FOR PERMITTING |
| | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND |
| | SSYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT |
| | COST EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION |
| | REFERENCE IS ICC (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT |
| | AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES PER |
| | 108.3 FBC* |
| | |
| | MYRON JACOBS |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER |
| | TEL:(561)805-6726 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
