| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-19 20:23:10 | 2007-01-19 20:23:10 |
| | |
| | ** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW** |
| | |
| | ** THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS WERE SUBMITTED UNDER *PLAN |
| | REVIEW*ONLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS MEET THE 2004 FBC 13-415.2 AND |
| | 13-415.1.AB.1.1 AND TO CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD ON JANUARY 10TH, |
| | 2007 WHICH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE GONE OVER ALONG |
| | WITH THE PLANS. THESE WERE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION THE SAME DAY. UPON REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, |
| | THIS REVIEWER COMMENTED ON THE FACT THAT THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS IN THE INPUT DATA SECTION WAS STILL |
| | INDICATING *MANUAL ON/OFF* AND NEEDED TO CORRELATE WITH |
| | PLANS FOR *AUTOMATED* CONTROLS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THIS WAS NOT DONE. |
| | THERE WERE ALSO COMMENTS ON THE MISSING OVER RIDE TIMES |
| | ON THE T-OVER-RIDE DEVICES AND MOTION/OCCUPANCY SENSORS |
| | WHICH DID NOT INDICATE THE MAXIMUM TIMES AS REQUIRED |
| | AND PERMITTED BY THE CODE WHICH WAS IN THE TWO PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | IT WAS THE SUGGESTION OF THIS REVIEWER THAT THESE ITEMS |
| | MAY BE CORRECTED AND NEW SHEETS AND CALCULATIONS MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENCING AS |
| | A BENEFIT AND TO ALLEVIATE ANY FURTHER DENIALS AND |
| | DELAYS IN THE PERMITTING.PLEASE KNOW THAT NEW |
| | ELECTRICAL SHEETS, A NEW STRUCTURAL SHEET AND ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS WERE BROUGHT INTO OUR OFFICE BY THE PERMIT |
| | EXPEDITOR AND WERE ALLOWED TO BE INSERTED INTO THE |
| | SETS.THIS REVIEWER HAD NOTICED THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS WERE SIGNED, AND CONTAINED A *RUBBER |
| | STAMP* FOR SEAL; HOWEVER THE REQUIRED RAISED EMBOSSED |
| | TYPE SEAL AS REQUIRED UNDER THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | CODE 61G15-23.001 WAS NOT VISIBLE WITH ANY INFORMATION |
| | ON SAID SEAL. IT WAS NOTED AND SUGGESED BY THIS |
| | REVIEWER ONCE AGAIN IN THE INTEREST OF NOT DELAYING THE |
| | PROJECT TO HAVE NEW SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS BE SENT OVER NIGHT MAIL AND BROUGHT IN |
| | BEFORE REVIEW COMMENCED. THE NEW CALCULATIONS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED AND PLACED WITH PACKAGE FOR REVIEW. PLEASE |
| | SEE UPON REVIEW OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS, THE INPUT |
| | DATA STILL INDICATES * MANUAL ON/OFF* WHEN IN FACT |
| | THESE ARE OF AN *AUTOMATED* CONTROL. PLEASE SEE THAT |
| | THE FLA-COM DOES HAVE THE OPTION TO INSERT THE CORRECT |
| | INFORMATION FOR THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT UPON REVIEW OF SAID ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS, THESE ARE DATED NOVEMBER 27, 2006. IT IS |
| | UNCLEAR HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE WHEN THE MEETING TO GO |
| | OVER THESE CALCULATIONS AND PLANS DID NOT TAKE PLACE |
| | UNTIL JAN OF 07? |
| | A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS WAS NOT PERFORMED WHEN |
| | THESE TWO SUBMITTALS WERE BROUGHT IN BEFORE THIS |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE REVISED ELECTRICAL SHEETS WHICH |
| | WERE INSERTED INTO THE SETS. PLEASE SEE THE REQUIRED |
| | RAISED, EMBOSSED SEAL IS ILLEGIBLE AND NO INFORMATION |
| | ON SAID SEAL CAN BE MADE OUT EVEN BY USING A |
| | SHADOWING/DUSTING METHOD. THE RUBBER STAMPED SEAL IS |
| | NOT ACCEPTED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. FAC |
| | 61G15-23.001. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO SEE THESE SHEETS ARE ALSO DATED NOVEMBER |
| | 27TH, 2006 WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE ONCE AGAIN. PLEASE SEE |
| | THE REVISION DATES IN THE TITLE BLOCKS ALSO INDICATE |
| | 11/27/06 WHICH IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THESE ARE RESPONSE |
| | TO COMMENTS FROM MEETING DATED 1/10/07 PLEASE SEE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER FROM THE DESIGNER'S OFFICE DATED |
| | JANUARY 15TH, 2007 MENTIONS SOME RESPONSE(S) WHICH WERE |
| | NOT PART OF MY COMMENTS IN THE MEETING DATED JANUARY |
| | 10TH, 2007. ( RESPONSE #4) |
| | PLEASE BE SURE ALL SHEETS ARE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED |
| | CORRECTLY AND THE TITLE BLOCKS REFLECT THE CORRECT |
| | DATES WHEN PLANS WERE REVISED. |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.1 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT AS OF THE MEETING DATED |
| | JANUARY 10TH, 2007 THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED DETAIL FOR |
| | TRANSFORMER MOUNTING WAS ALSO NOT SUBMITTED. IT WAS |
| | ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT THIS INFORMATION MAY BE BROUGHT |
| | IN WHEN INSERTING THE NEW REVISED ELECTRICAL SHEETS |
| | BEFORE THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW WAS TO COMMENCE. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE STRUCTURAL 8 1/2 X 11'S AND THE NEW *S* SHEETS |
| | IN SETS ARE MISSING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER FOR THE ENGINEERING FIRM ON THE |
| | TITLE BLOCKS. PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-23.002 AND FS |
| | 471.023. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT SHEETS WERE STAMPED FOR |
| | REVIEW OF CODE COMPLIANCE BY ANY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE UPON REVIEW OF THE NEW FP SHEETS IN |
| | THE MEETING DATED JANUARY 10TH, 2007 IT WAS NOTED BY |
| | THIS REVIEWER THAT THE STROBE/HORN LEVELS DID NOT |
| | INDICATE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM LEVELS AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | FBC 11-4.28.1,.2, .3(4). THIS WAS NEVER A COMMENT BY |
| | THIS REVIEWER AS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THIS REVIEW WAS |
| | ONLY RECENTLY BEING HANDLED BY THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW. |
| | THE COMMENT WAS MADE IN THE MEETING THAT THE LEVELS |
| | WOULD BE REDLINED; HOWEVER AS THE PLANS ARE BEING |
| | DENIED AND GOING OUT FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE CORRECT |
| | AND REVISE THESE SHEETS AT THIS TIME WITH THE CORRECT |
| | MINIMUM LEVELS. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS THIS PROJECT DID NOT APPLY FOR |
| | PERMIT UNTIL AFTER DECEMBER 7TH, 2006,ON DECEMBER |
| | 8TH, 2006 THE STATE OF FLORIDA ADOPTED THE 2005 |
| | NFPA-70. PLEASE ADJUST PLANS. THIS WAS GOING TO BE |
| | REDLINED AS STATED IN THE MEETING ON JAN 10TH, HOWEVER |
| | SINCE PLANS ARE COMING BACK PLEASE REVISE AT THIS TIME. |
| | THIS INCLUDES THE SHEET AT.1 WHICH CAN BE REDLINED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC |
| | ALSO WENT INTO EFFECT ON THE SAME DATE. PLEASE CONFIRM |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 13, AS THERE WERE CHANGES, |
| | AND VERIFY ANY CHANGES WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND OTHER |
| | TRADES FOR POSSIBLE CHANGES. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENTS ARE MADE BY |
| | OTHER TRADES. |
| | IF NO TECHNICAL CHANGES TO PLANS ARE REQUIRED, THEN THE |
| | CODE FOR THE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC CAN ALSO BE |
| | HAND REDLINED ON AT.1 |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE SUBMITTED PLANS FOR THE |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS SHALL CONTAIN THE PRINTED NAME AND |
| | SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND |
| | WORK FOR THIS SCOPE. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2, 106.1.1.1 |
| | ** THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT WAS MADE BY |
| | THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS SHALL |
| | CONTAIN THE PRINTED NAME OF THE ARCHITECT. THIS CAN BE |
| | HAND PRINTED ON THE TITLE BLOCKS. THIS IS REQUIRED PER |
| | FAC 61G1-16.004. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED EVEN IF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS HAVE BEEN |
| | STAMPED AS CODE COMPLIANT. |
| | THIS WAS IN THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS. THIS IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: ** PLEASE KNOW AS THE PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | * PLAN REVIEW* AND NOT FOR PERMIT THE 4X TIMES THE FEE |
| | FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE |
| | REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS HAS NOT BEEN ASSESSED AS |
| | REQUIRED PER FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS |
| | ASSESSED WHEN PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED LEGALLY FOR |
| | PERMITTING. |
| | PLEASE KNOW HOWEVER THAT ONE SET OF EACH SET OF |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE BEING |
| | RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | |
| | **** PLEASE KNOW AS THIS REVIEWER WILL BE THE LICENSED |
| | REVIEWER TO ISSUE SAID PROJECT, IT IS THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THIS REVIEWER THAT COMPLIANCE FOR |
| | ISSUANCE OF PERMIT IS MET FOR ALL ASPECTS OF THE |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, FLORIDA STATUTES AND OTHER |
| | PERTINENT LAWS AND ORDINANCES. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | ** ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-01-19 17:58:04 | 2007-01-19 17:58:04 |
| | NEW SHEETS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED 1/16. ALSO |
| | NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED AS A SUBMITTAL ON |
| | 1/19. |
| | REVIEW IN PROGRESS. |
| 2007-01-14 16:16:10 | 2007-01019 16:16:10 |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEW ON HOLD, WAITING FOR NEW SHEETS ALONG |
| | WITH NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS BEFORE REVIEW STARTS. THIS |
| | IS AT THE REQUEST OF THE OWNER'S AND ARCHITECT. OTHER |
| | TRADES MAY REVIEW WHEN AVAILABLE. |
| | TO BE SUBMITTED ON 1/16 |
