| Date |
Text |
| 2007-02-02 08:07:46 | ***** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW******* |
| | |
| | **** IMPORTANT**** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*. |
| | |
| | A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY |
| | THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE |
| | #1** |
| | |
| | B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A |
| | REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | NOTE WILL BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF |
| | THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW NOTE #1** |
| | |
| | D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED ** |
| | NEW NOTES **. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS DO NOT CONTAIN ANY CODE |
| | INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.5.3.1.2 ETC. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS WHICH REFLECT THE 2002 NFPA-70 |
| | (NEC), THE 2002 |
| | NFPA-110, 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK/NO, PLEASE SEE THE SPECS FOR THE UNIT ARE |
| | OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE ENGINEERING SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THE SLAB CONTAINS A RAISED SEAL OVER A COLOR |
| | PHOTO-COPIED SIGNATURE WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER FS |
| | 471.025. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STRUCTURAL CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF 4- |
| | 2 1/4 INCH TAPCONS DO NOT SEEM SUFFICIENT, PLEASE SEE |
| | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE SLAB DETAIL AND SPECS FROM |
| | MANUFACTURE. PLEASE SEE SIZE INDICATED FOR THIS 80KW |
| | UNIT DOES NOT EXIST ON SHEETS FROM THIS MANUFACTURE AND |
| | HAS NOT BEEN LOCATED ON THEIR WEBSITE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 CHAPTER 7 FOR MOUNTING AND |
| | LOCATIONS OF GEN.. |
| | FBC CHAPTER 27. 2004. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS AS UNIT IS BEING |
| | PROPOSED IN A FLOOD ZONE "A", WHICH WILL REQUIRE UNIT |
| | AT A MIN OF 6" ABOVE BFE. PLEASE KNOW, ENGINEERING ON |
| | SLAB, FOUNDATION AND MOUNTING IS NEEDED AS THE |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT SUFFICIENT. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:NO, SAME COMMENT, PLEASE PROVIDE LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE EXISTING SERVICE. |
| | 220.35, 215.5, ETC. PLEASE SEE THE SEC AND FEEDERS TO |
| | EXISTING PANEL. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER SUBMITTED IS SHOWING SEC'S AND FEEDERS |
| | WHICH ARE NOT LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE GENERATOR FEEDERS OR |
| | THE 600A SERVICE BEING SHOWN. |
| | PLEASE SEE 240.4, 310.16 AND ADJUST. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: NO, SAME COMMENT, NO EGC IS TO BE INSTALLED |
| | FROM METER TO FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT, THIS IS |
| | PARALLELING THE NEUTRAL. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE RISER IS SHOWING AN "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTOR" FROM METER TO MAIN/FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT |
| | WHICH WILL CREATE OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS. 250.6, |
| | 250.24B |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED IN NOT |
| | SUFFICIENT WITH COMPLETE DETAILS LAYOUTS ETC. THIS MUST |
| | SHOW ALL IN DETAIL, NO WHITE OUT, OR HAND DRAWN CHANGES |
| | WHICH DEFER FROM EACH SHEET. PLEASE SEE FBC 106.1.3 FOR |
| | MINIMUM REQUIRED DETAILS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE UNIT IS BEING SHOWN ON SITE/SURVEY PLANS |
| | SHOWING THE EXACT LOCATIONS AND SETBACKS FROM ALL |
| | SURROUNDING STRUCTURAL WALLS, FENCES ETC. |
| | PLEASE OBTAIN INFORMATION FROM GENERATOR MANUFACTURE |
| | WHICH SPECIFIES THE MINIMUM CLEARANCES. PLEASE KNOW, AS |
| | THE SPEC FOR THE GEN WAS NOT SUBMITTED, IT IS BEING |
| | ASSUMED THIS UNIT IS A GENERAC UNIT, AND THE |
| | INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THIS OFFICE IS THAT THEY |
| | REQUIRE A MIN OF 5FT FOR THE LARGER LIQUID COOLED |
| | UNITS. |
| | 110.3, 90.7 |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: NO, THIS WAS STILL NOT SUBMITTED IN PACKAGE |
| | AND WILL BE REQUIRED AT STATED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS TO DATE THE SUBMITTED GENERATOR |
| | PACKAGE MUST CONTAIN THE GAS INFORMATION RISER ETC, |
| | PLEASE SEE PLUMB REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: NO, THE PARTIAL LAYOUT ON ONE SHEET IN THE |
| | PACKAGE DOES NOT PROVIDE THE DETAIL REQUESTED. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE MANUFACTURE SPEC/CUT SHEETS DO NOT INDICATE ANY |
| | LISTING FROM A NRTL. |
| | PLEASE SEE MODEL, UNIT, VOLTAGE, TYPE OF UNIT IS NOT |
| | HIGHLIGHTED ON SPECS. |
| | 110.3, 90.7. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A LAYOUT/OVERVIEW ON PLANS WHICH SHOWS |
| | THE LOCATIONS OF ALL SERVICE EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON |
| | RISER DIAGRAM. |
| | PLEASE SEE SPECS FOR ATS DO NOT SEEM TO INDICATE THE |
| | NEMA RATING IF THE ATS IS OUTSIDE. |
| | PLEASE ALSO HIGH-LIGHT UNIT. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 110.3 |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: NO/OK, THIS SEEMS TO BE OK, HOWEVER PLEASE |
| | KNOW AT THIS TIME AS THE LISTING ON EQUIPMENT CAN NOT |
| | VERIFIED BASED ON THE DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED THIS |
| | COMMENT REMAINS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SEE NO DISCONNECT GROUPED WITH THE EXISTING MAIN |
| | COULD BE LOCATED ON PLANS OR ON RISER. PLEASE SEE |
| | 225.31-225.39, 230.72. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE BREAKER LOCATED INSIDE THE GENERATOR IS |
| | NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THIS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE ATS AS SUBMITTED DOES NOT CONTAIN A |
| | MAIN DISCONNECT RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED AS REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE FEEDERS COMING FROM THE GENERATOR. THIS TYPE |
| | UNIT MAY ONLY CONTAIN "TOGGLE" TYPE DEVICE WHICH IS NOT |
| | RATED. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: NO, SEE NOTE #3 ABOVE. PLEASE ALSO SEE NOT |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | THIS COMMERCIAL BUILDING. PLEASE SEE THE LOAD CALCS |
| | SUBMITTED ARE FOR A RESIDENTIAL HOUSE WHEN THIS IS A |
| | COMM BLDG.???? 220.3, 220.10, 220.11, 220.13, ETC |
| | CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125% 215.3, 230.42 ETC. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER THIS COMMENT WILL REMAIN AS ANY |
| | NEW SHEETS SHOULD CONTAIN THE SAME. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** |
| | WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DESIGNS WHICH ARE NOT DONE BY AN |
| | ENGINEER, PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PLANS/DESIGNS MUST |
| | CONTAIN THE PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANS AND DESIGNS. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | |
| | **** NEW NOTES**** |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT HAS |
| | EXPIRED SINCE ITS RECORDING IN AUGUST. PLEASE SEE THAT |
| | THE NOC WILL ONLY NEED TO BE RE-RECORDED BEFORE PICKING |
| | UP THE PERMIT. FS 713.13(2). |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS THE SCOPE OF WORK AND EQUIPMENT |
| | HAS INCREASED SO THE VALUE FOR COMPELTE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | NEEDS TO BE INCREASED. |
| | FBC 108.3 |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A |
| | NOTICE AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
