| Date |
Text |
| 2007-05-08 09:44:27 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FROM THE PREVIOUS LISTS, NUMBERING REMAINING THE SAME |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY: |
| | |
| | 1.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2.)AS AGREED, THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY.PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION (CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY) IN THE |
| | BUILDING CODE CHECKLIST AS THE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF FBC EB |
| | CHAPTER 8.SOME COMMENTS ARE DUE TO THE CHAPTER 8 |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 7.)PROVIDE A SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY |
| | TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE |
| | 602. |
| | |
| | 8.)1ST REVIEW COMMENT - THE NORTH WALL APPEARS TO BE |
| | A |
| | TENANT SEPARATION WALL; WHAT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | IS THAT SPACE?SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 302.3.2. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW COMMENT - THE PLAN WAS REVISED TO SHOW B |
| | OCCUPANCY.NO COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 302.3.2 |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW COMMENT - AS DISCUSSED, IF THIS IS A |
| | SEPARATED USE FBC302.3.2, A 3 HOUR OCCUPANCY SEPARATION |
| | IS REQUIRED BETWEEN B AND F1, FBC TABLE 302.3.2.IF |
| | THIS IS A NON SEPARATED USE FBC302.3.1, YOU MUST SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE MOST STRINGENT OCCUPANCY FBC TABLE |
| | 503, FBC TABLE 601, FBC TABLE 602.IF ALLOWABLE AREA |
| | INCREASES ARE USED, SHOW ALL CALCULATIONS ON THE PLAN. |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE IS TO BE CLEAR AND IS TO BE |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN (CANNOT BE ADDRESSED THROUGH |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER). |
| | |
| | WHEN SHOWING REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE, EITHER SPECIFY |
| | AN APPROVED LISTING OR CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE |
| | (LISTING ALL COMPONENTS AS WELL AS TIME ASSIGNED TO |
| | EACH COMPONENT), FBC CHAPTER 7. |
| | |
| | 10.)PROVIDE OVERALL DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | SPACE ON THE LIFE SAFETY SHEET A120.1. (NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | OVERALL DIMENSIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON ANY OF THE FLOOR |
| | PLANS PROVIDED.) |
| | |
| | 11.)SEE FBC306.2.FOOD PROCESSING IS |
| | FACTORY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | CLARIFY WHY YOU HAVE DECLARED BUSINESS |
| | OCCUPANCY FOR THE FOOD PROCESSING AREA. |
| | SEE FBC302.1, PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES ARE |
| | TO BE CLASSIFIEDWITH RESPECT TO |
| | OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.PER MY CONVERSATION WITH |
| | THE ARCHITECT, THE FOOD IS PREPARED AND SERVED HOT AT |
| | ANOTHER LOCATION.DESPITE THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | (THE FACT THAT THE FOOD LEAVES THE FACILITY HOT RATHER |
| | THAN COLD), I THINK THAT THE CORRECT OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION IS F1, FBC306.2.ARCHITECT IS TO EITHER |
| | REVISE THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ON THE PLAN AND |
| | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE OR SUBMIT JUSTIFICATION (IN |
| | WRITING, PRIOR TO THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL) FOR THE |
| | BUSINESS OCCUPANCY DECLARED TO BE REVIEWED BY ASSISTANT |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL.AS DISCUSSED IN OUR TELEPHONE |
| | CONVERSATION, IT APPEARS THAT A NON SEPARATED USE |
| | FBC302.3.1 MAY BE AN OPTION. |
| | |
| | 16.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE |
| | ENERGY CALC FBC13-103.1. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - THE PREPARER AND OWNER AGENT ARE TO SIGN |
| | THE ENERGY CALCS. |
| | |
| | 17.)THE SQUARE FOOT AREA ON THE ENERGY |
| | CALC DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN.NO |
| | UNCONDITIONED AREA SHOWN ON THE ENERGY |
| | CALC, UNCONDITIONED AREA SHOWN ON PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - PLEASE DECLARE TOTAL SF AREA FOR THE |
| | TENANT SPACE, BOTH CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED.WHEN |
| | SCALED, THE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 1568 SQUARE FEET. |
| | ENERGY CALCS STATE 1750 CONDITIONED, 1750 |
| | CONDITIONED/UNCONDITIONED.OCCUPANT LOAD IS 30 AT |
| | 100SF PER PERSON.CODE COMPLIANCE WITH OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE DETEREMINED DUE TO |
| | INSUFFICIENT/INCOMPLETE/INCONSISTENT INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | THE ENERGY CALCS DID NOT PASS ELECTRIC REVIEW.NOTE |
| | THAT ENERGY CALCS ARE REQUIRED; CORRECT, CODE COMPLIANT |
| | ENERGY CALCS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS CAN NEVER BE WAIVED OR |
| | PROVISO'D. |
| | |
| | 18.)INTERIOR FINISHES TO COMPLY WITH TABLE 803.5. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - THIS WAS ADDRESSED ON SHEET A130. HOWEVER, |
| | THE ARCHITECT HAS DECLARED BUSINESS OCCUPANCY BUT THE |
| | INTERIOR FINISHES REQUIREMENTS DO NOT COMPLY WITH TABLE |
| | 803.5 FOR BUSINESS OCCUPANCY, BUT ARE COMPLIANT FOR |
| | F1. |
| | |
| | 19.)SEE ATTACHED FS 553.80(2)(B). |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - DUE TO SEVERAL OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS, A 4X |
| | PLAN REVIEW FEE HAS BEEN ASSESSED AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE.A BILL IS ATTACHED AND MUST BE PAID |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | 18.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.SEE FBC11-4.1.4.6(2). |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - SEE ATTACHED DETAIL WHICH IS THE CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD PARKING DETAIL AND REVISE |
| | A110.1.ALSO SHOW THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE; FROM THE |
| | PUBLIC WAY, AND FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING.THIS CAN |
| | BE DONE ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
