| Date |
Text |
| 2007-03-14 10:58:10 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-A) COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO |
| | THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSS ENGINEER NEEDS TO HAVE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE |
| | AND SEAL IN ALL GENERAL DETAILS SHEETS SUBMITTED WITH |
| | TRUSS PACKAGE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA |
| | STATUTE AND SEC. 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR STORM SHUTTERS. |
| | PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | ATTACHED SAMPLE OF INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. NEED TO |
| | CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC PANEL MOUNTING CONDITIONS, |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES, EDGE DISTANCE, GLASS SEPARATION, |
| | ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING AND STRUCTURE TO BE ATTACHED TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | STORM PANEL PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS.TWODIFFERENT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED, BUT NONE OF THEM IS |
| | ACCEPTABLE.ONE OF THEM IS NOA 03-0605.05 WHICH |
| | EXPIRED ON 05/21/06. THE OTHER ONE NOA 03-0605.04 IS |
| | FOR 4", 6" AND 12" ONLY. NEED TO PROVIDE CORRECT AND |
| | CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B) SLIDING GLASS DOORS. NEED ONE WITH LEGIBLE |
| | DRAWINGS.ONLY ONE COPY WAS SUBMITTED. NEED TWO |
| | COPIES. |
| | |
| | C) ENTRY DOOR. IF USING SAME MODEL AS GARAGE SIDE |
| | DOOR, THEN CLEARLY INDICATE SO. |
| | |
| | 4- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. LETTER SUBMITTED STATINGTHAT |
| | HE REVIEWED "ALL" PRODUCT APPROVALS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | THIS STATEMENT DOESN'T IDENTIFY EXACTLY WHAT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED. NEED TO IDENTIFY IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) EACH SPECIFIC PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 5- NEED TO PROVIDE 2X STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR |
| | THERMA-TRU CONSTRUCTION SERIES OUTSWING DOOR NOA |
| | 01-0828.10.PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED REQUIRES 2X |
| | STRUCTURAL BUCK. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL.ARCHITECT'S |
| | LETTER STATES THAT HIS ENGINEER TOLD HIM THAT 2X4 BUCKS |
| | ARE NOT REQUIRED. PRODUCT APPROVAL SHOWS 2XSTRUCTURAL |
| | BUCK DETAIL, THEREFORE DETAIL FOR 2X STRUCTURAL BUCK |
| | DETAIL ATTACHMENT IS REQUIRED.PROVIDE SUCH DETAIL. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY OPENING PROTECTION AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R309.1. NOTE IN DRAWING 1 OF 6STATING"GAR |
| | DOOR PROTECTION SHALL COMPLY WITH R309 2004 RES FBC. |
| | SEE NOA"IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.ARCHITECT NEEDS TO READ |
| | THIS CODE SECTION AND SPECIFY HOW IS COMPLYING WITH |
| | THIS CODE SECTION. ALSO,WHICH ONE IS THE NOA |
| | REFERENCED IN THIS NOTE?. |
| | |
| | 7- ARCHITECT'S TRUSS LOADING ON DRAWING 1 OF 6 AND |
| | TRUSS LOADING SPECIFIED ON TRUSS DRAWINGS DON'T MATCH. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET 5 OF 6: |
| | A) ARCHITECT STATES ON REVISED ITEM 13(B) THAT |
| | "(1)HTSM20 ISEQUIV TO (1)HETA20.THIS IS INCORRECT |
| | THIS TWO CONNECTORS ARE NOT EQUIVALENT. SEE CATALOG. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) ARCHITECT TO REVIEW TRUSS DRAWINGS. CONNECTORS |
| | NEED TO RESIST THE CALCULATED UPLIFT AND LATERAL LOADS. |
| | REVISE ALL CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) ARCHITECT TO REVIEW GIRDER TRUSSA-13G ABOVE |
| | INTERIOR BEARING WALL AND SPECIFY CONNECTORS TO RESIST |
| | LOADS AT DESIGNED BEARING POINTS.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT.SEC. 713.13 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | NOTE: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENTEXPIRESAFTER 90 DAYS OF |
| | BEING RECORDED IF WORK IS NOT STARTED. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
