| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-10 15:33:34 | BUILDING REVIEW 3RD CHECKLIST: |
| | |
| | 1- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WAS RECORDED ON 03/02/07. PER |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE SEC. 713.13IT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS |
| | OF RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED. THEREFORE, NEED TO |
| | RE-RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AND RE-SUBMIT TO |
| | THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 2- FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED FOR A BUILDING LOCATED IN A "C" FLOOD ZONE. |
| | |
| | 3- NEED TO PROVIDE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 13-600 FBC 2004. |
| | ***NOTE:MAKE SURE 2006 REVISED FORM IS USED. |
| | |
| | 4- NOW IS NOT CLEAR IF WINDOWS WITH IMPACT GLAZING WILL |
| | BE USED OR IF STORM PANELS WILL BE USED. BOTH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED.SUBMIT ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR EITHER ONE. |
| | IF USING STORM SHUTTERS THEN, COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE SHOWING SPECIFICMOUNTING CONDITIONS AND |
| | ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 5- PLANS NOW SHOW ROOF SHINGLES INSTEAD OF FLAT ROOF |
| | ASSEMBLY. |
| | THEN, AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLES TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | 6-SHINGLES PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVE IN WRITING BY ENGINEER OF RECORD AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 106.3.3CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- ROOF PITCH WAS REVISED TO HAVE 2:12 PITCH. |
| | THEREFORE,NEED TO SPECIFY TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE ALONG WITH 2006 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET 4: |
| | A) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG) ARE THE ANCHOR BOLTS USED |
| | TO SUPPORT WALL LEDGER TO EXISTING WALL. SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY HOW IS THEROOF GOING TO HAVE CROSS |
| | VENTILATION'S AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE.R-19 INSULATION DOESN'T ALLOW AN AIR |
| | GAP SPACINGFOR CROSS VENTILATION IF IT'S INSTALLED IN |
| | A 2X6 JOIST.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG) ARE THE BOLTS FOR |
| | CONNECTORS HTT22 SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 ANDSIMPSON |
| | CATALOG. |
| | |
| | 9- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING MINIMUM TYPE OF NAIL TO BE |
| | USED. NEED TO USEMIN. 8D RING SHANK NAILS.SEE 2006 |
| | REVISED SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE AND REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- WHYDID ENGINEER SIGNED PLANS WITH 8/16/07 DATE?. |
| | |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: ONE COPY OF THESE PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN |
| | THIS OFFICE TO BE SENT TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
