| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-08 19:00:11 | BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 2- A) REVISE SURVEY. FLOOD ZONE IS "C" PER COMMUNITY |
| | PANEL 120229 0015 B OF MARCH 1ST, 1979. NOTX N/A. B) |
| | BOTH COPIES TO HAVE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 3- NEED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 13 |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4- 24 SH WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY WITH BEDROOM EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.1.2 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | 5- A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR STORM SHUTTERS. |
| | NEED A KEY PLAN AND COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE |
| | ATTACHED SAMPLE OF INSTALLATION SCHEDULE THAT CONTAINS |
| | ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION TO PERFORM PLAN REVIEW.OR |
| | PROVIDE ANY OTHER MEANS WHICH WILL SHOW ALL THE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR PLAN REVIEW. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS. |
| | ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IT IN WRITING (NOT |
| | SIGNING AND SEALING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR : |
| | FLAT ROOF SYSTEM: |
| | A)IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE |
| | INSTALLED, SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION. IF SELECTED |
| | SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7, THEN |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION AS REQUESTEDON GENERAL LIMITATION |
| | #7.IF SELECTED APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS LIMITED BY |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #9, THEN SYSTEM MAY NOT BE USED |
| | BECAUSE LIMITATION #9 DOESN'T ALLOW NAIL ENHANCINGAS |
| | REQUIRED AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. SEE GENERAL |
| | LIMITATIONS ON PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE ATTACHED COPY OF |
| | CITY POLICY FOR ROOFING PERMITS AND PROVIDE ALL |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY BASE SHEET FASTENING OPTION ON SELECTED |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | C) ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION WAS TOO LOW. IT WAS |
| | UPDATED TO $30,788. OWES $1670.98 FOR PERMIT VALUATION |
| | AND RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET 4: |
| | A) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG, HOW MUCH EMBEDMENT) FOR |
| | ANCHOR BOLT AT EXISTING WALL LEDGER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) GIVEN THE TYPE OF ROOF NEED TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS |
| | RIDGE VENT IN ORDER TO PROVIDEVENTILATION. (3) 8"X16" |
| | SPREADED VENTS DON'T PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION BETWEEN |
| | THE SOLID JOIST.SEC. R806 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY SIZE (HOW LONG, HOW MUCH EMBEDMENT) FOR |
| | HTT22 CONNECTOR. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | D) SPECIFY CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EXTERIOR |
| | DOOR BY UTILITY AREA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004 AND SEC. R301 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | E) DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATIONS FOR WINDOWS ARE TOO |
| | LOW ACCORDING TO WINDOW SIZE AND LOCATION. PROVIDE |
| | ACTUAL CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW DESIGN PRESSURES WERE |
| | CALCULATED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TOFBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- CONTRACTOR TO UPDATE THE LICENSE RECORDS WITH THE |
| | PERMIT CLERK. |
| | |
| | 10- SPECIFY LEVEL OF ALTERATION AS REQUIRED BY SECTION |
| | 301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
