| Date |
Text |
| 2007-06-04 21:09:29 | ** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME EXISTING COMMENTS WHICH |
| | ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW |
| | COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED AND SOME |
| | ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE CODES ON E1.01 WERE |
| | UPDATE TO THE 2005 NEC AND 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS? |
| | THE TITLE BLOCK MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE PER BLDG |
| | DEPARTMENT COMMENTS; HOWEVER THERE WERE COMMENTS FROM |
| | THIS REVIEWER ON EITHER OF THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS |
| | WHICH REQUESTED THE CODES TO BE CHANGED. PLEASE SEE ANY |
| | NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH REFERENCE CODE YEARS, |
| | REFERENCED THE 2002 NEC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL PERMITS APPLIED FOR BEFORE |
| | DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS UNDER THE 2004 FBC |
| | W/2005 REVISIONS AND THE 2002 NFPA-70 (NEC). |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH REQUESTED THE SIGNATURE OF |
| | THE OWNER AGENT( CONTRACTOR) AS STATED ON ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. THESE WERE SUBMITTED WITHOUT SIGNATURES. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT |
| | FROM THE CORRECT VERSION ADOPTED BY THE FBC FOR THIS |
| | PERMIT. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS EVEN STATE THEY ARE |
| | ONLY EFFECTIVE AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PERMITS ONCE AGAIN APPLIED BEFORE |
| | THIS DATE PLACES VERSIONS UNDER THE 2004 FBC W/2005 |
| | REVISIONS. ( VERSION FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS 2.1?) |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED NEED TO |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING ON PLANS. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE PLANS DO INDICATE EXTERIOR LIGHTING, HOWEVER |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONSDO NOT INCLUDE ANY EXTERIOR |
| | LIGHTING ENTERED IN THE SUMMARY/LIGHTINGPERFORMANCE |
| | OR INPUT DATA REPORT. |
| | PLEASE REVISE AND ADJUST ALL ENERGY CALCULATIONSPER |
| | 13-103.1.1.1, 13-415.1.AB.1.1, 13-415.2 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED |
| | PHOTO-METRICS TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE FOR EXIT PATHS |
| | AND STAIRS. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS WERE REVISED TO |
| | INCREASE LIGHTING FIXTURES, HOWEVER THE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | MENTIONS TO SEE THE PHOTO-METRICS ATTACHED, YET NONE |
| | COULD BE LOCATED AS PART OF THE DESIGNERS SUBMITTED |
| | PLANS OR ATTACHED SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE SEE LS 101 2003, 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. |
| | AS NONE WERE SUBMITTED, REVIEW CAN NOT BE |
| | ACCOMPLISHED. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW WHERE |
| | SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR ATS/ GENERATOR WAS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REVIEW. PLEASE CLARIFY THEATS DEVICES IF THEY ARE |
| | 3-POLE OR 4-POLE. AS THE SHEETS ONLY INDICATE ORDERING |
| | METHOD FOR TYPE AND THE PLANS ONLY INDICATE 3-PHASE AND |
| | 4-WIRE. |
| | IF SD SYSTEMS, RISER WOULD NEED TO COMPLY WITH 250.20, |
| | 250.50 ETC. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO MENTIONS THE |
| | GENERATOR BUILDING AS INDEED A SEPARATE *BUILDING*? |
| | PLEASE SEE 225.31, AND 250.32 FOR THIS IS A SEPARATE |
| | BUILDING/STRUCTURE, THEN GROUNDING AT THIS BUILDING |
| | WOULD BE SHOWN AND A DISCONNECTING MEANS IN PANEL GR. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING NOTE FOR MORE CLARIFY FOR THE |
| | GR PANEL. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS SPOKE OF CIRCUITS |
| | FOR COMMON AREAS.(MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, GENERATOR ROOM, |
| | OUTSIDE LIGHTING, ROOFTOP RECEPTS)ETC. BRANCH CIRCUITS |
| | WHICHARE SHOWN COMING FROM TENANT SERVICES WHICH IS |
| | NOT PERMITTED. |
| | (EXAMPLE, ROOFTOP BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR WP RECEPTACLES |
| | TRIPS, HOWEVER THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE OCP/BREAKER IS TO |
| | THE SECOND FLOOR TENANT WHICH IS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO |
| | ANYONE) |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS CIRCUITS IN THE MAIN |
| | ELECTRICAL ROOM TO THE PANEL P1 WHICH IN THE PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE THESE SAME CIRCUITS ARE BLANK? |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE IS NO PANEL SCHEDULE FOR PANEL GR AND |
| | YET THE CIRCUITS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON PANEL P1 ACTUALLY |
| | ARE LABELED TO FEED THE CIRCUITS IN THE GENERATOR ROOM |
| | WHICH INDICATE CIRCUITS TO A GR PANEL? THIS IS |
| | CONFUSING AND NOT CLEAR WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE LIGHTING ON THE EXTERIOR OF |
| | BUILDING AND STAIRS INDICATES CIRCUITS TO A PANEL GP |
| | WHICH IS NOT ON RISER AND NO PANEL WAS SCHEDULE |
| | SUBMITTED ETC?? PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THESE ARE BEING |
| | FED FROM? |
| | 240.24, 210.25 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2, 215.5, FBC |
| | 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2, 106.4 |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS THE NEW PANEL GR |
| | BEING *TAPPED* FROM A DISCONNECT YET THE EQUIPMENT |
| | COORDINATION SCHEDULE SHOWS THIS BEING *TAPPED* FROM |
| | THE ATS-1? |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE 240.21 FOR THE TAPPED CONDUCTOR |
| | LIMITS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT BESIDE THE LENGTH NOT PERMITTED ANY |
| | TAPPED CONDUCTORS MUST TERMINATE IN OVER CURRENT |
| | PROTECTION AND AS NO PANEL GR SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED NO |
| | VERIFICATION FOR MCB AND OCP CAN BE VERIFIED. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL QUESTIONS ON NOTES 5, 6 |
| | AND 7. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS *EQUIPMENT |
| | GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* FROM THE METER TO THE FIRST MEANS |
| | OF DISCONNECT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. 250.6, 250.24 |
| | (THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED IF PLANS WERE NOT COMING |
| | BACK FOR OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.22 AND CLARIFY THE SEPARATE |
| | BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR ELEVATOR CAB LIGHTS. IF TAPPED, |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDUCTORS AND OCP AT TERMINATION. |
| | (RISER AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE INDICATE 3-POLE FOR |
| | LIGHTING?? |
| | 240.4, 240.21, 310.16. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE 225AMP BREAKER IN PANEL M2 |
| | IS FEEDING THE 200AMP RATED DISCONNECT FOR THE |
| | ELEVATOR. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS IS TO AVOID *FALSE |
| | TRIPPING*? THIS IS NOT CLEAR WHEN THE DISCONNECT IS |
| | 200AMPS AND THE TAPS FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE |
| | ELEVATOR CAB LIGHTS IS IN QUESTION PER NOTE #9. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED FOR ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE SUBMITTED BACK FOR REFERENCE |
| | YET NONE WERE SUBMITTED? |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT THE SAME NOTE WILL APPLY FOR THE |
| | FOLLOWING REVIEW. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
