| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-21 09:50:02 | **** UNSAT **** |
| | 3RD REVIEW UNDER PERMIT # 06071334 |
| | 6TH REVIEW FOR THIS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE.(PREVIOUS# |
| | WAS 05041961 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW STILL NEED |
| | TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NEC 2002. 220, 220.31, 220.16, |
| | 220.14, 220.17, 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 210.11C2,ETCFOR |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS, MINIMUM CIRCUITS, AND LOADS FOR EACH |
| | OF THOSE MINIMUM CIRCUITS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM ALL OF THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEWS STATED THAT THE LOADS SHOWN ON THE |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE DID NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LOADS IN THE |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE AMPERAGES SHOWN ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE KVA/WATTAGE LOAD ON THE LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE LOADS OF 6AMPS IS BEING SHOWN FOR |
| | WASHER/LAUNDRY CIRCUIT, HOWEVER THIS DOES NOT CORRELATE |
| | WITH THE KVA ON CALCULATIONS |
| | PLEASE SEE THE DISHWASHER/DISPOSAL IS STILL BEING SHOWN |
| | ON THE SAME CIRCUIT AND IS SHOWN ON WITH THE DINING |
| | ROOM CIRCUIT. THE LOADS ON THE DISHWASHER AND DISPOSAL |
| | ARE MOST LIKELY DEDICATED CIRCUITS. THIS OFFICE HAS |
| | NEVER SEEN A DISHWASHER ON WITH THE DISPOSAL AND ALL |
| | THE OTHER RECEPTACLES AS SHOWN. PLEASE SEE THE DISPOSAL |
| | IS STILL ONLY BEING SHOWN HARDWIRED. IF THIS IS FED |
| | FROM THE SAME RECEPTACLE OUTLET AS THE DISHWASHER |
| | (SPLIT OUTLET) PLEASE SEE 210.4B |
| | PLEASE SEE MICROWAVE. |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUIT DESIGNATIONS |
| | ON PANEL SCHEDULE. ONE CIRCUIT SEEMS TO BE SHOWN AS 2ND |
| | FLR GFI, INSTEAD OF SM APPL. PLEASE SEE THE OTHER |
| | CIRCUIT SHOWN IN THE KITCHEN IS SHOWN FEEDING THE |
| | REFRIGERATOR ONLY. PLANS SHOW ONE CIRCUIT FEEDING ALL |
| | COUNTER SPACE RECEPTS IN THE KITCHEN. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LOAD FOR THE POOL PANEL IS BEING SHOWN |
| | AS 30AMPS, YET THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ONLY INDICATE |
| | 2.2KW?? |
| | PLEASE SEE GARAGE DOOR OPENER WHICH IS STILL BEING |
| | SHOWN ON WITH ALL OTHER RECEPTS IN THE GARAGE. PLEASE |
| | SEE MOTOR LOADS AS STATED ABOVE 220.14, 430.148. |
| | PLEASE SEE AS STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS; PLEASE |
| | CORRELATE ALL OF THE LOADS ON PANEL SCHEDULE WITH THE |
| | LOADS BEING SHOWN IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS. |
| | THE ABOVE ITEMS ARE NOT ALL POSSIBLE ITEMS AS THE NOTES |
| | MENTIONS; CODE COMPLIANCE FOR ALL SHALL BE MET. |
| | THE COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT MENTIONS ALL OF |
| | THESE WOULD BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTACLE IN GUEST ROOM, |
| | THIS WAS ON PREVIOUS PLANS, HOWEVER IS NOW REMOVED. IF |
| | PLANS WERE OK WITH LOAD CALCULATIONS, THIS WOULD HAVE |
| | BEEN REDLINED. 210.52 2FT OF WALL SPACE. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE AHU'S IN THE FIRST FLOOR CLOSET |
| | AND 2ND FLOOR ATTIC ARE STILL BEING SHOWN WITH 220V |
| | RECEPTACLES? THIS WAS GONE OVER ON THE MEETING WITH THE |
| | ARCHITECT AND THE DESIGNER. THE RECEPTACLE WAS GOING TO |
| | BE REMOVED, HOWEVER STILL SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE |
| | THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED, HOWEVER SEE NOTE #1. |
| | THE AHU'S ARE TO BE HARDWIRED TO DISCONNECTS, THESE ARE |
| | NOT TO BE CORD AND PLUG CONNECTED. THE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED COMMENT RESPONSE FROM THE ARCHITECT MENTIONS |
| | WOULD BE ADDRESSED AND CORRECTED. |
| | 4220.30, 422.30, 440.11. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED ALL |
| | CIRCUITING ON PLANS TO CORRELATE WITH PANEL SCHEDULE. |
| | PLEASE SEE DRYER IS STILL BEING SHOWN WITH A RECEPTACLE |
| | WHICH FEEDS THE GUEST ROOM? |
| | (CIRCUIT #20). |
| | 408.4, 310.16, 240.4, |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.4 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS POOL SUB PANEL BEING |
| | 30AMP, YET THIS IS BEING FED FROM A 40AMP BREAKER ON |
| | THE MAIN PANEL. PLEASE CORRELATE THE LOADS (AS NOTED |
| | ABOVE IN NOTE #1), PLEASE CORRELATE THE SIZE OF THE |
| | PANEL AND ANY OTHER ASPECTS TO THIS. |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WOULD BE CORRECTED AS THIS |
| | COMMENT WAS IN PREVIOUS REVIEWS;, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE |
| | THIS IS STILL IN NEED OF COORDINATION. |
| | 310.16, 240.4, 220, ETC. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS GIVEN NOTICE IN THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS, A 4X FEE HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FOR REPEAT CODE COMPLIANCE COMMENTS PER |
| | 553.80(2)(B). |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FEE OF $2820.00 HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED TO |
| | THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY |
| | OF THE CONTRACTOR OR THE OWNER OF PROPERTY. |
| | ONE COPY OF THE ELECTRICAL PLANS IS BEING RETAINED AND |
| | WILL BE PLACED WITH THE OTHER PREVIOUS FIVE SETS OF |
| | PLANS PREVIOUSLY RETAINED IN FILE. THESE PLANS WILL BE |
| | FORWARDED TO THE STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECT'S LEGAL |
| | COUNSEL ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETED. |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-01-19 20:51:07 | 2007-01-19 20:51:07 |
| | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW |
