| Date |
Text |
| 2006-10-27 13:07:24 | ********** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW UNDER 06071334 |
| | *************** |
| | 5TH REVIEW FOR PROJECT** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THAT THIS ISNOW THE |
| | 5TH REVIEW FOR THIS PROJECT. PLANS |
| | ORIGINALLY CAME IN UNDER A "PLAN REVIEW" |
| | FOR THREE REVIEWS UNDER #05041961 AND |
| | NOW ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. |
| | PLEASE SEE MANY OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | COMMENTS ARE FROM ALL PREVIOUS |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEWS. |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW ONCE AGAIN PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED. |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHER |
| | POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES. |
| | PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE SAME |
| | REVIEWERS AS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED. |
| | PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ONE COMPLETE SET OF |
| | PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED AND WILL BE ALL |
| | SETS OF PLANS PREVIOUSLY RETAINED. ONCE |
| | ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE PLANS WILL BE |
| | FORWARDED TO THE STATE BOARD OF |
| | ARCHITECT'S AND STATE'S LEGAL COUNSEL TO |
| | THE BOARD. THESE PLANS WILL NOW HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED FOUR TIMES FOR A SINGLE |
| | FAMILY HOUSE WITH MOST OF THE SAME |
| | COMMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B). |
| | PLEASE KNOW, IF PLANS COME BACK WITH ANY OF THE SAME |
| | COMMENTS FOE CODE COMPLIANCE NOT ADDRESSED, A 4X FEE |
| | WILL BE ASSESSED. |
| | PLEASE SEE |
| | FS 481.221(4) |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:NO, SOME CIRCUITS SHOWN BLANK ON SCHEDULE FOR |
| | CONDUCTOR AND BREAKER SIZES FOR THIS? |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WHICH MENTIONS THE BATH |
| | CIRCUIT WITH THE GFI RECEPT MAY NOT BE PART OF ANY |
| | OTHER DEVICES/OUTLETS OUTSIDE THE BATH ROOM. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11C3 |
| | FOR CIRCUITING OF BATH(S). PLEASE SEE |
| | MULTIPLE BATHS MAY NOT BE FED FROM THE |
| | SAME CIRCUIT WHEN FEEDING BATH LTS AND |
| | RECEPTS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE REQUIRED DEDICATED |
| | BATH CIRCUIT(S) ARE ALSO SHOWN FEEDING |
| | OTHER AREAS? (HALL, CLOSETS ETC). |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS SHOW THIS IS VIOLATION |
| | OF CODES ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: NO, SAME NOTE> |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE FOR FUTURE POOL PANEL. |
| | TWO SETS OF FEEDER SIZE ARE SHOWN?? |
| | #8'S ? #6'S? |
| | 215.5, FBC106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:NO, SAME NOTE > |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MIN DISCONNECT |
| | CLEARANCES PER 110.26 FOR A/C CU. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE:NO/OK, PLEASE SEE ACCESS SEEMS TO BE |
| | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THAT THE UNITS ARE NOW |
| | BEING SHOWN AND NOTED HAVING RECEPTS FOR UNIT??? PLEASE |
| | SEE 440.11,110.26 AS DISCONNECTS ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL COMMENTS |
| | AS AHU SHOWN IN ATTIC IS MORE THAN 6' |
| | AWAY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN AS THE ATTIC |
| | ACCESS ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE MISSING LT AND RECPT.210.70,210.63 |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: NO, LOAD CALCULATIONS DO NOT MEET CODE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 220.31 , 220. |
| | CAN NOT TAKE DE-RATINGS FOR SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOW WASHER/LAUNDRY CIRCUIT IS BEING SHOWN AS |
| | 1200 VA. PLEASE SEE 220.16, 210.11C2 FOR MIN VA. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE NEC FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHERE AND |
| | HOW THESE FIGURES ARE DERIVED AS THE |
| | DERATING SHOWN DO NOT APPEAR IN THE |
| | CODE. PLEASE SEE DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES |
| | ARE BEING SHOWN WHICH ARE NOT PERMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE 220. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE MANY LOADS (AMERAGES) |
| | SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT CORRELATE |
| | WITH THE KW RATINGS SHOWN ON LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE A/C#1, A/C #2, DRYER, RANGE |
| | ETC, HOW AND WHERE DO THESE AMPERAGE'S |
| | COME FROM. PLEASE SEE THE KW RATING IS |
| | DIVIDED BY THE VOLTAGE TO ARRIVE AT THE |
| | AMPERAGE AND THE FIGURES SHOWN JUST |
| | DON'T ADD UP.???? |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHER LOADS WHERE LOADS ARE |
| | TAKEN AT 40%?? PLEASE INDICATE HOW AND |
| | WHERE IN THE NEC PERMITS THESE AT 40%?? |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 2002 ART 220. |
| | PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY HOW THE LOADS SHOWN |
| | OFGENERAL LIGHTING AND RECEPT LOADS |
| | ARE DERIVED. AN AMPERAGE LOAD IS SHOWN |
| | FOR EACH OF THESE?? |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE:NO, DISC SHOWN, HOWEVER DO NOT MEET 110.26. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED |
| | DISCONNECTS FOR CU'S 440.11 AND PLEASE |
| | SEE 110.26 FIR MIN CLEARANCE. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE:OK. |
| | |
| | *** NEW NOTE ** |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FS 553.80(2)(B) ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW, IN NO CASE CAN WHITE OUT OR HAND |
| | WRITTEN CHANGES BE PLACED ON PLANS SIGNED , DATED AND |
| | SEALED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. |
| | FS 481/471 |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
