| Date |
Text |
| 2006-11-21 18:38:29 | *** UNSAT3RD REVIEW *** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. PLEASE |
| | ALSO SEE SOME NEW NOTES DUE TO CHANGES IN PLANS AND HOW |
| | THINGS ARE NOW SHOWN ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED. PLEASE |
| | ALSO SEE A NEW ELECTRICAL SHEET WHICH WAS NOT ON EITHER |
| | OF THE FIRST TWO REVIEWS. |
| | PLEASE SEE TWO NEW NOTES WHICH WERE MISSED BY THIS |
| | REVIEWER FROM THE PREVIOUS SET OF PLANS. ( MASTER BATH |
| | GFI RECEPT LOCATION/LOADS FOR A/C'S ON EXIST PANEL |
| | "A"). |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A LAYOUT FOR THE SMOKE ALARM |
| | DEVICE IN THE EXISTING DWELLING AREAS EITHER EXISTING |
| | WHICH MEET THE CURRENT CODE OR NEW TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | THIS WAS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. |
| | NEED TO SHOW THE SA DEVICES INSIDE AND OUTSIDE ALL |
| | SLEEPING ROOMS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE A DETAIL WAS SUBMITTED WHICH MENTIONED |
| | NEW AND EXISTING BEING TIED TO CIRCUIT B-12, HOWEVER |
| | PLEASE SEE SMOKE DETECTOR DETAIL WHICH SHOWS THESE |
| | BEING CIRCUITED TO THE KITCHEN OR BATH LIGHTING |
| | CIRCUIT. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS PER A RECENT CONFERENCE; PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THESE DEVICES AS "SA" FOR SMOKE ALARM PER THE |
| | DEFINITIONS FROM NFPA-72. PLEASE KNOW AS PER AN |
| | INTERPRETATION FROM NFPA A SD(SMOKE DETECTOR) IS A |
| | DEVICE WHICH ONLY "DETECTS" AND DOES NOT SOUND AN |
| | AUDIBLE ALARM, WHERE A SA (SMOKE ALARM) DOES BOTH. THIS |
| | COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS AS THIS |
| | WAS ONLY BROUGHT TO ATTENTION RECENTLY. PLEASE BE SURE |
| | TO ADJUST CIRCUITING AS DETAIL SHOWS KIT/BATH CIRCUIT |
| | AND PLANS CALL FOR B-12. |
| | NFPA-72 11.5.1.1,11.8.3, FBC R313 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW CALL FOR 22K AIC RATINGS |
| | FOR ALL MAIN AND BREAKERS. PLEASE VERIFY THIS STATEMENT |
| | AS 22K RATED BRANCH BREAKERS WOULD BE ALMOST UNHEARD OF |
| | FOR A SINGE FAMILY DWELLING AND IT DOES NOT SEEM THIS |
| | IS THE INTENT OF WHAT THE DESIGN IS SUGGESTING. THE |
| | EXSPENSE OF ALL BREAKERS BEING 22K WOULD ALSO BE |
| | SUBSTANITAL. IS THE INTENT TO MAKE THE MAINS 22K RATED |
| | WITH A SERIES RATING FOR THE BRANCH BREAKERS? IF SO, |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THIS . |
| | PLEASE SEE 110.9, 240.12. |
| | PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE AND MIS-PRINT FOR PANELS |
| | WHICH SHOWS "ACI" RATINGS. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A GFI IS BEING SHOWN IN JACUZZI |
| | AREA WHICH IS PART OF THE BATH ROOM RECEPT CIRCUIT |
| | HOWEVER ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW THIS GFI DESIGNATION WAS |
| | BEING TAKEN FOR THE JACCUZZI TUB, HOWEVER UPON REVIEW |
| | THE PLANS APPEAR TO BE SHOWING A GFI RECEPT LOCATED |
| | ABOVE AND IN THE TUB AREA WHICH IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.52D. PLEASE SEE 680.71 FOR GFI |
| | DESIGNATION IS REQUIRED FOR THE JACUZZI CIRCUIT EITHER |
| | AT THE RECEPT OR THE BRANCH BREAKER FEEDING THIS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS APPEAR TO HAVE INTENDED A |
| | DEDICATED CIRCUIT FOR THE MASTER BATH GFI AND OTHER |
| | BATH GFI, HOWEVER THE PANEL DESIGNATION DOES NOT |
| | INCLUDE "BATH" GFI, ONLY SHOWS BEDROOM GFIFOR EACH OF |
| | THESE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 210.52D, 210.11.C3 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE DINING ROOM DESIGNATION WAS |
| | REMOVED FROM THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | PLEASE PLACE ON PLANS. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, ADMIN SECT. 210.52B1 |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE IS NOW A SHEET E-2 WITH LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR PANEL "B" WHICH IS COMPLETELY |
| | DIFFERENT FROM THE PANEL "B" LOAD CALCULATION SUBMITTED |
| | ON E-1.?? |
| | PLEASE SEE MISSING THE LOADS PER 220.31, 220.16 ETC. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:PLEASE ALSO SEE PANEL "A" SHOWS LOAD |
| | CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE 20KW OF HEAT LOADS YET |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE ONLY INDICATES A TOTAL OF 15KW OF HEAT. |
| | (ONE AT 10KW AND THE OTHER AT 5KW). |
| | PLEASE SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS ALSO SHOW A "SHIFT" OF |
| | SOME KIND ON THE LOADS TO THE RIGHT OF ALL THE |
| | APPLIANCES. |
| | BOTH OF THESE ITEMS WERE SHOWN THE SAME WAY ON PREVIOUS |
| | PLANS(2ND SET) HOWEVER WAS NOT COMMENTED ON. 220.31. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER IS STILL SHOWING "EQUIPMENT |
| | GROUNDING CONDUCTORS" BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE SEE 250.6, |
| | AND 250.24B. THE FOLLOWING IS TAKEN FROM THE CODE. |
| | |
| | 250.6 OBJECTIONABLE CURRENT OVER GROUNDING CONDUCTORS. |
| | (A) ARRANGEMENT TO PREVENT OBJECTIONABLE CURRENT. THE |
| | GROUNDING OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS, |
| | SURGE ARRESTERS, AND CONDUCTIVE NON-CURRENT-CARRYING |
| | MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ARRANGED |
| | IN A MANNER THAT WILL PREVENT OBJECTIONABLE CURRENT |
| | OVER THE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS OR GROUNDING PATHS. |
| | |
| | THE REST OF 250.6 AND 250.24B TALKS OF THE EQUIPMENT |
| | GROUNDING CONDUCTORS AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT ONLY. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW A LAYOUT OF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE |
| | ON PLANS TO VERIFY GROUPING OF MAINS PER 230.72. |
| | |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW A |
| | NOTICE WAS GIVEN WITH REFERENCE TO FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS. PLEASE |
| | KNOW SOME OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS ARE THE SAME FROM THE |
| | FIRST AND SECOND REVIEW, HOWEVER THE PLANS SEEM TO HAVE |
| | INTENT AND AN ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS COMMENT(S), EVEN |
| | THOUGH IT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED FULLY. THE 4X FEE |
| | FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE IS NOT |
| | ASSESSED AT THIS TIME. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME OTHER COMMENTS WERE ORIGINATED ON THE |
| | SECOND REVIEW WHICH WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE |
| | NEXT REVIEW SO THE NOTICE IS STILL GIVEN AS A NOTICE |
| | ONLY. |
| | AS ON PREVIOUS REVIEW ONE SET OF EACH OF THE ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE FOR FILE. ONE |
| | SET OF THE REDLINED PLANS ARE BEING RETURNED. ** IT IS |
| | RECOMMENDED THAT IF THERE ARE NAY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS |
| | OR THE NOTES TYPED ABOVE ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY FASHION, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE TO GO |
| | OVER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | **PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
