| Date |
Text |
| 2007-01-14 15:19:39 | |
| | |
| | **** UNSAT2ND REVIEW**** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN QUESTION. PLEASE SEE SOME ARE NEW BASED ON THE |
| | REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM |
| | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH AN ANSWERS OF OK, NO OR |
| | OK/NO. |
| | |
| | OK, WILL SHOW THE PREVIOUS NOTE REMOVED. |
| | NO, WILL CONTAIN FURTHER EXPLANATION OF THE PREVIOUS |
| | NOTE. |
| | NO/OK, IS THAT PART OF THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED FULLY AND WILL BE FOLLOWED BY FURTHER |
| | EXPLANATION. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE |
| | END OF THESE REVIEW NOTES AND WILL BE SEPARATED WITH |
| | *** NEW NOTES 2ND REVIEW *** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS IS |
| | SUBMITTED AND IS LOCATE DON E00. PLEASE SEE ONLY A |
| | LIGHT POLE DETAIL WAS SUBMITTED. NO REFERENCE TO WIND |
| | LOADS, RATINGS, EPA OF FIXTURES ETC. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT WIND LOADING CALCULATIONS FOR NEW LT |
| | POLES. IF THESE ARE NOT GOING TO BE UNDER THIS PERMIT, |
| | THEN THE CALCULATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION FEES AND PLANS AT A LATER DATE. FBC |
| | 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE:NO/OK. PLEASE SEE SOME OF THESE WERE ADDED |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE PLANS ON E-2 WHICH INDICATES THE |
| | 2003-2004 FBC. PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. IT |
| | SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN A MISPRINT AS NO REFERENCE TO THE |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 WAS MADE. |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE AND CORRELATE AS NOTED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE PLANS REFLECT THE FOLLOWING CODES AT |
| | A MINIMUM. |
| | 2002 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 NFPA-101. |
| | 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE NO TIMES OR DETAILS FOR THESE |
| | DEVICES WAS NOTED OR SHOWN. PLEASE SEE MAXIMUMS TIMES |
| | PERMITTED SHALL BE STATED. (30 MINS FOR OC TYPE DEVICE |
| | AND 4HRS ON ANY TIMER TYPE DEVICES).PLEASE ALSO SEE |
| | TIME DEVICE SHOWN ON PLANS, BUT NOT IN SYMBOL LEGEND |
| | ETC. PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES PERTAINING TO THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROLS FOR SHUTTING OFF |
| | OF LIGHTING IS REQUIRED PER FBC CHAPTER 13 |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: OK. ? THIS WAS A COMMENT FOR BUILDING/FIRE |
| | REVIEW WHICH WAS ONLY NOTED. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE RISER HAS REMOVED THIS |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE MSB BOARD WHICH STILL INDICATES |
| | AND EQUIPMENT GROUNDING IN THE FEEDERS WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED 250.6, 250.24B. PLEASE KNOW THAT THESE ARE |
| | ACTUALLY SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS. PLEASE SEE NEC |
| | ART 100 DEFINITIONS AS THESE ARE NOT FEEDERS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS AN |
| | EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR BEFORE THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT FROM FPL. |
| | PLEASE SEE 250.6, 250.24B AS "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING |
| | CONDUCTORS" ARE ONLY INSTALLED AFTER THE FIRST MEANS OF |
| | DISCONNECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | *** NEW NOTES **** |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. PLEASE SEE |
| | 13-415.1.AB.1, AND 13-415.2 AS A METHOD C ENERGY |
| | CALCULATION WAS SUBMITTED WHICH COULD NOT BE USED BASED |
| | ON THE SCOPE OF WORK BEING DONE. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THE AMOUNT OF |
| | FIXTURES AND TYPES OF CONTROLS. PLEASE SEE THESE |
| | INDICATE 400 FIXTURES AND MANUAL ON/OFF CONTROLS. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM WHICH |
| | INDICATES A METER BELOW A DISCONNECT WHICH WILL MOST |
| | LIKELY NOT MEET 110.26 FOR CLEAR SPACE AND EQUIPMENT |
| | BEING ABLE TO BE LOCATED 6INCHES OUT. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ADDRESS ON PLANS IS NOT CORRECT |
| | BASED ON THE LOCATION AND SCOPE OF WORK FOR SHELL AS |
| | SHOWN. PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS |
| | THE COMMENTS FROM THE ADDRESSING REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROP |
| | SCENARIOS FOR BRANCH CIRCUITS AND FEEDERS PER |
| | 13-413.1ABC.1/13-413.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2. |
| | |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
