| Date |
Text |
| 2006-08-11 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 06070445 |
| | ADD: 2015 OKEECHOBEE BLVD. |
| | CONT: BOCA DEVEL. & CONST. |
| | TEL: (561)391-6227 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | EX FBC CODE= 2004 EXISTING FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2) FL S S 713.13 |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) |
| | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS |
| | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED |
| | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. |
| | |
| | 3) ARCHITECT STEVEN L. COHEN AR0006819 |
| | IS WORKING WITH A DELINGUENT LICENSE, |
| | EXPIRED 02/28/05. |
| | WWW.MYFLORIDA.COM/LICENSING |
| | |
| | 4) PLANS INDICATE THAT A SOILS |
| | INVESTIGATION IS TO BE COMPLETED. |
| | FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS |
| | NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. |
| | WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL |
| | IS NOT DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE EXPLOR |
| | ATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF AS |
| | TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING |
| | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDA- |
| | TIONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPA- |
| | CITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECH- |
| | NICALREPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF |
| | FLORIDA. |
| | |
| | 5) A1.1.4 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF ROOF |
| | SHORING DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE |
| | SEALED BY ENGINEER. PLEASE PROVIDE THESE |
| | SHORING PLANS. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE SOME CLARITY ON AN |
| | ISSUE. SHEET A1.2 NORTH WALL OF THE |
| | PROJECT THERE APPEARS TO BE NEW |
| | EXTENSIONS (LOADING DOCKS) IN BAYS 1&2. |
| | A2.1 CLEARLY INDICATES THE NEW WORK TO |
| | BE COMPLETED, BUT NO VISIBLE PROPERTY |
| | LINES. ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY |
| | DATED 4/08/05 INDICATES ONE LARGE LOT, |
| | WHERE AS THE SURVEY COMPLETED BY WALLACE |
| | DATED 1/25/06 CLEARLY INDICATES TWO LOTS |
| | WITH A 20' DEDICATED ALLEY WITH A 20' |
| | INGRESS/ EGRESS EASEMENT. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE |
| | IS LOCATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS |
| | TO SEE IF THE NEW EXTENTIONS CREATE |
| | TABLE 601 & TABLE 704.8 ISSUES. |
| | |
| | 7) INTALKING WITH VINCE NOEL IN |
| | ENGINEERING ( CITY SURVEYOR) THIS NEW |
| | PROPERTY WILL ALSO NEED TO BE TIED TO |
| | THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH WHICH THE |
| | BUILDING SITS ON TO CREATE ONE PROPERTY |
| | SO THE NEW ADDITIONS DO NOT CROSS |
| | PROPERTY LINES AND PROVIDES THE REQUIRED |
| | AREA BY TABLE 704.8 FOR OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE OTHER ISSUE VINCE NOEL BROUGHT UP |
| | IS THE REROUTING OF ALL UTILITIES THAT |
| | NOW WILL NEED TO FOLLOW THE NEWLY |
| | CREATED INGRESS/ EGRESS EASEMENT. |
| | PERMITS NEED TO BE OBTAINED FOR THIS |
| | WORK. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE:8-14-06I SPOKE WITH HAROLD |
| | PISKURA THE MANAAGER OF THE RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR PROGRAM TO SEE IF A RESIDENT |
| | INSPECTOR WOULD BE NEEDED FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT. HAROLD INDICATED THAT A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR "WOULDN"T" BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10) ENERGY FORMS: EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | 708.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALTERATIONS |
| | SUBJECT TO THIS CHARTER SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH THE REQUIREMEENTS OF CHAPTER 13 OF |
| | THE FBC, BUILDING. |
| | 13-101.1.6 |
| | SHELL BUILDINGS. |
| | NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THAT ARE |
| | PERMITTED PRIOR TO DESIGN COMPLETION OR |
| | WHICH WILL BE FINISHED IN SECTIONS AT A |
| | TIME AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHELL |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH EITHER METHOD B OR C |
| | OF SUBCHAPTER 13-4 OF THE CODE PRIOR TO |
| | GRANTING OF A PERMIT TO BUILD. ALL |
| | ASSUMPTIONS MADE ABOUT FEATURES NOT |
| | INSTALLED UNTIL LATER THAT ARE NOT ON |
| | THE BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE LISTED AND |
| | APPENDED TO THE COMPLIANCE FORM |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. |
| | UNLESS THE BUILDING IS COMPLETED AS PER |
| | ALL ASSUMPTIONS MADE IN THE ORIGINAL |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL, A REVISED |
| | CODE SUBMITTAL(S) USING METHODS A, B OR |
| | C SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN COMPLETION OF |
| | THE BUILDING (OR PART OF THE BUILDING) |
| | IS PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 11)A1.1 CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES THIS |
| | IS A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION. 707.5.1 AN |
| | ENGINEERING EVALUATION AND ANYLSIS THAT ESTABLISHES THE |
| | STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF |
| | THE ALTERED STRUCTURE SHALL BE PREPARED |
| | BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER |
| | AND SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | THE EVALUATION AND ANYLISIS SHALL |
| | DEMONSTRATE THAT THE ALTERED BUILDING OR |
| | STRUCTURE COMPLIES WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING FOR WIND |
| | LOADING. |
| | THE REPORT SUBMITTED WAS CALCULATED |
| | UNDER THE ASCE 7-98 WHEREAS THE 2004 FBC |
| | IS UNDER THE ASCE 7-02. |
| | |
| | 12)A1.1 CODE ANALYSIS, INDICATES THIS |
| | EXISTING BUILDING IS TO COMPLY WITH |
| | LEVEL 3 ALTERATIONS, IT IS ALSOREQUIRED |
| | TO COMPLY WITH EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FOR ADDITIONS CHAPTER 9. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 902.2 AREA LIMITATIONS. |
| | IF AREA INCREASES ARE TAKEN PROVIDE THE CALULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 13A) A1.3 SITE PLAN DETAIL A8.1.1DETAIL |
| | NUMBER 3, PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE WIDTH |
| | OF THE CURB CUT. |
| | |
| | 13B) A1.3 SITE PLAN DETAIL A8.1.2 |
| | DETAIL# 2 ON THAT SHEET, NO SUCH DETAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | 13C) THE CROSS WALKS THAT LEAD FROM THE |
| | DEISABLED PARKING SPACE TO THE STORES |
| | DOES NOT LEAD TO THE STORE FRONTS WHERE |
| | THE COVERED ENTRY IS LOCATED BUT TO A |
| | SIDEWALK WITH A MUCH SMALLER CANOPY AND |
| | A FURTHER DISTANCE TO THE STORE FRONT. |
| | 11-2.2 EQUIVALENT FACILITATION. |
| | |
| | 14A) A1.2 SITE PLAN INDICATES THE NEW |
| | CURB CUTS ACCESS AISLES, NEW LANDSCAPE |
| | AND NEW LANDSCAPED ISLAND. EX FBC 706 |
| | A BUILDING, FACILITY OR ELEMENT THAT IS |
| | ALTERED SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 11 OF |
| | THE FBC, BUILDING. |
| | 11-4.6.2(1) ALL PARKING SPACES MUST |
| | BE LOCATED ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE NO |
| | LESS THAN 44 INCHES (1118 MM)WIDE SO |
| | THAT USERS WILL NOT BE COMPELLED TO WALK |
| | OR WHEEL BEHIND PARKED VEHICLES |
| | THIS PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE THE |
| | DISABLED ACCESS TO THE SSTORES WITHOUT |
| | TRAVELING BEHIND SOMEONE ELSES PARKED |
| | VEHICLE. |
| | NOTE, 11-4.1.6(2) DUTY TO PROVIDE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO ALTERED |
| | AREAS SHALL BE DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE |
| | TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN THE COST |
| | EXCEEDS 20 % OF THE COST OF THE ALTERA- |
| | TION TO THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA. |
| | (A)(I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE |
| | (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | (III) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE REST- |
| | ROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE |
| | UNISEX RESTROOM |
| | (IIII) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONE |
| | (IV) ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STOR- |
| | AGE OR ALARMS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN ALYSIS OF MONIES |
| | SPENT TO MEET THE 20% OF CONTRACT VALUE. |
| | |
| | 14B) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE CROSS WALKS |
| | AND HANDICAPPED ACCESS |
| | AISLES,11-4.6.2(1) SO THAT NO USER WILL |
| | NOT BE COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL BEHIND |
| | PARKED VEHICLES. |
| | A1.1.3 THE DEMO PLAN DOESN'T |
| | INDICATE THE SITE AS IS NOW. |
| | 11-4.1.6(1) |
| | GENERAL. ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING |
| | BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (A)NO ALTERATION SHALL BE |
| | UNDERTAKEN WHICH DECREASES OR HAS THE |
| | EFFECT OF DECREASING ACCESSIBILITY OR |
| | USABILITY OF A BUILDING OR FACILITY |
| | BELOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION AT THE TIME OF ALTERATION. |
| | (B)IF EXISTING ELEMENTS, SPACES, OR |
| | COMMON AREAS ARE ALTERED, THEN EACH SUCH |
| | ALTERED ELEMENT, SPACE, FEATURE, OR AREA |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE |
| | PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11-4.1.1 TO |
| | SECTION 11-4.1.3 , MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. IF THE APPLICABLE |
| | PROVISION FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION REQUIRES |
| | THAT AN ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON AREA |
| | BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, THE ALTERED |
| | ELEMENT, SPACE, OR COMMON AREA IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED TO BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE |
| | EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 11-4.1.6 |
| | (2), ALTERATIONS TO AN AREA CONTAINING A |
| | PRIMARY FUNCTION. |
| | |
| | 14C) PLEASE PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF |
| | PARKINGSPACES THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR |
| | EACH OF THE OUT BUILDINGS, AND HOW MANY |
| | DISABLED SPACES ARE REQUIRED BY |
| | 11-4.1.2(5). |
| | |
| | 15) A1.3 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF |
| | BOLLARDS IN FRONT OF THE STORES BUT NO |
| | DEMINSION IS PROVIDES FOR CENTER TO |
| | CENTER?1010.5 RAMPS THAT ARE PART OF A |
| | REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL NOT BE |
| | LESS THAN 44 INCHES (1118 MM) WIDE. |
| | |
| | 16) FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A) STOREFRONT SYSTEMS/ MULLIONS |
| | B) GLAZED SWING DOORS |
| | C) EXTERIOR METAL SWING DOORS |
| | D)ROLL UP DOORS |
| | E)LOUVERS |
| | F) ROOF ASSEMBLIES |
| | G) PREMANUFACTURED METAL A/C STANDS |
| | H) METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS SEE NOTE! |
| | |
| | 17) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 18) W P B ADMINISTRTIVE CODE 106.3.3* |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH |
| | ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 19) METAL BAHAMA SHUTTERS- TO BE |
| | INSTALLED IN THE FIXED OPEN POSITION, |
| | SHUTTERS WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERING IN THE |
| | OPEN POSITION. THIS SYSTEM WILL NOT |
| | REQUIRE FL COVERSHEET. |
| | |
| | 20) THE SERIES A8 DRAWINGS SHOW A SERIES |
| | OF EXTERIOR BLOCK COLUMNS AND THE OTHER |
| | TWO SIDES OF THE BLOCK COLUMNS BEING |
| | CLAD IN PLYWOOD, WIRELATH AND STUCCO. |
| | THE PLANS DEPICTUSE OF 3/4" EXTERIOR |
| | GRADE PLYWOOD. |
| | |
| | 20A) SECTION 603 PROVIDES THE |
| | COMBUSTIBLES THAT ARE ALLOWED IN A TYPE |
| | II BUILDING. SEE 603.1(1)1.2) NONBEARING |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS WHERE NO FIRE RESISTANCE |
| | RATING IS REQUIRED DOES ALLOW FIRE |
| | RETARDANT TREATED WOOD, NOT JUST |
| | PLYWOOD. |
| | |
| | 20B) PLANS DO NOT INDICATE WHAT TYPE OF |
| | FINISH TO BE APPLIED TO SHEATHING, |
| | ASSUMED STUCCO? PROVIDE A WATER |
| | RESISTANCE BARRIER.1404.2 |
| | WATER-RESISTIVE BARRIER. |
| | A MINIMUM OF ONE LAYER OF NO. 15 ASPHALT |
| | FELT, COMPLYING WITH ASTM D 226 FOR TYPE |
| | 1 FELT, SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE |
| | SHEATHING, WITH FLASHING AS DESCRIBED IN |
| | SECTION 1405.3 , IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO |
| | PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS WATER-RESISTIVE |
| | BARRIER BEHIND THE EXTERIOR WALL VENEER. |
| | |
| | |
| | 20C) THE METAL STUDS INDICATE 2X6 BUT |
| | NOT WHAT GAUGE? |
| | |
| | 20D) A8.1.4 PORTACO CEILING INDICATES |
| | USE OF 2X6 NO GAUGE OF STUD? IS THERE TO |
| | BE STIFF BACKS? WHAT DEFLECTION IS BEING CONSIDERED |
| | INTO THE DESIGN? |
| | |
| | 20E) THE PLANS INDICATE ONLY 5/8" SMOOTH |
| | STUCCO OVER PAPERBACK METAL LATH. THE |
| | WEIGHT OF THE EXPANDED METAL LATH HASN'T |
| | BEEN PROVIDED, NOR THE TYPE OF FASTENERS |
| | NOR THE LENGTH OF THE FASTENERS. SEE |
| | ASTM C-1063. |
| | |
| | 20F) PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF |
| | FASTENER WILL BE USED TO HOLD THE STEEL |
| | PLATES TO THE WALL FOR THE STUCCO |
| | CEILING. |
| | |
| | 20G) THE PORTACO ROOF SECTION DOES ALSO |
| | INDICATE THE USE OF 3/4" PLYWOOD. NO |
| | MENTION OF FIRE RETARDANT TREATED |
| | PLYWOOD.SEE TABLE 601 NOTE3, ITEM 3. |
| | NOTE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOF |
| | WILL NEED TO MATCH THE MATERIALS FOR THE |
| | ROOFING DECK. |
| | |
| | 21) A8.1.5 BED BATH & BEYOND PORTACO |
| | INDICATES 2 SECTIONS ONE DETAIL# 3/ |
| | A8.1.5 THE OTHER IS DETAIL# 7/ A8.3 |
| | |
| | 21A) DETAIL3/ A8.1.5 IS A CUT SECTION OF |
| | THE PORTICO'S NORTH/ SOUTH WALLS |
| | INDICATING 2X6 STEEL STUD CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 21B) THE FRONT AND END DETAILS |
| | (EAST-WEST WALLS) ARE MISLABELED.IF |
| | DETAILS 2 & 3 OF A8.3 ARE USED THE |
| | CORRECT CORNICE PROJECTION IS VIEWED, |
| | BUT THE DETAILS INDICATE BLOCK |
| | CONSTRUCTION NOT STEEL STUD. |
| | |
| | 21C) IF STEEL STUDS ARE TO BE USED FOR |
| | EITHER WALL OR ROOF FRAMING PROVIDE THE |
| | GAUGE OF STUD, FLANGE WIDTH AND STYLE OF |
| | |
| | PRODUCT TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | 22) A8.1.6 COMP USA PORTACO INDICATES BY |
| | ELEVATION 25'-10 START OF NEW WORK BUT |
| | CROSS HATCHING SHOWING NEW WORK IS AT A |
| | LOWER LEVEL? PROVIDE ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION. 106.1.2*. |
| | |
| | 23) SHEET A8.2 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES USE |
| | OF 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PRESSURE TREATED |
| | PLYWOOD NO MENTION OF FIRE RETARDANT |
| | TREATED PLYWOOD.TABLE 601, |
| | FOOTNOTE(C)(2) |
| | |
| | 24) A8.2 SAME DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE |
| | USE OF EXPANDED WIRE MESH AND STUCCO, NO |
| | MENTION OF PAPERBACK MESH, TYPE OF MESH, |
| | WEIGHT OF MESH NOR SPACING OF FURRING |
| | ABOVE? SEE ASTM C-1063. |
| | |
| | 25) A8.4 EXIT PASSAGEWAY DETAIL: |
| | |
| | 25A) DISCREPANCY THE ACTUAL DETAIL |
| | INDICATES USE OF 3 5/8" STEEL STUDS |
| | SPANING A HEIGHT OF 25'-4" NO CENTERS |
| | WHEREAS THE 1 HR RATED UL-U465 DETAIL |
| | INDICATES 5 5/8" STEEL STUDS AT 24" O.C. |
| | NO HEIGHT LIMITATION IS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 25B) TABLE 2508.1 PROVIDES THE STANDARD |
| | FOR NON-LOAD BEARING WALLS WITH GYPSUM |
| | BOARD APPLICATION ASTM C-754. SEE |
| | 5.3.1.2 STUD HEIGHTS SHALL BE BASED ON |
| | DESIGN CRITERIAOF A MINIMUM 5 PSF LOAD |
| | AND A MINIMUM OF L/120 DEFLECTION. |
| | APPENDIX A PROVIDES THE LIMITATIONS ON A |
| | |
| | 3 5/8" STUD @ 24" O.C., L/120 AND A 5 |
| | PSF:MAXIMUM HEIGTH OF 11'-7". |
| | THIS TABLE ONLY GOES TO A 4" STUD |
| | WIDTH. |
| | USING THE ICC - ICBO ER REPORT 4943 |
| | THERE ARE NO TABLES FOR A 5 5/8" STEEL |
| | STUD , THERE ARE TABLE FOR 6" STUDS. |
| | USING THE DEFLECTION L/120, 5PSF @ 24" O.C.THICKNESS OF |
| | 27 WHICH IS 22 GAUGE |
| | THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 21'-11", |
| | USINGTHE SAME CRITERIA 6" STUD, |
| | L/120,5PSF, @ 16" O.C. THICKNESS27/ 22 |
| | GAUGE , THE MAXIMUM HEIGTH OF 26'-10". |
| | USING THE SAME CRITERIA AND |
| | CHANGING THE CENTERS TO 12" O.C. THE |
| | MAXIMUM STUD HEIGHT OF 31'-0". |
| | PLEASE CORRECT PLANS. |
| | |
| | 26) A10.2 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF |
| | STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING ON VAARIOUS |
| | CURVED CANOPIES. |
| | |
| | 26A) ON DETAILS 5&9 WHERE THE CANOPY HAS |
| | A CONCAVE CURVE, AT THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| | CURVE, RAIN WATER WILL BUILD UP UNDER |
| | THE STANDING SEAM, WHAT STOPS THE WATER |
| | FROM LEAKING THROUGH? THERE IS NO DRAIN |
| | IN EACH BAY? ADITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.106.1.2* |
| | |
| | 26B) ON THE CONCAVE SIDE OF THE CANCOPY |
| | WHAT STOPS THE STANDING METAL SEAM FROM |
| | |
| | WRAPPING? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.106.1.2*. |
| | |
| | 26C) PLANS INDICATE THE USSE OF 3/4" |
| | PLYWOOD NO MENTION OF FIRE RETARDANT |
| | TREATED WOOD DECK, TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE |
| | (C)(2). |
| | |
| | 26D)PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF FOAM |
| | BANDS, SEE A8.1.6 COMP USA HEIGHT OF 45'-0",S-3ALSO |
| | SHOWS A HEIGHT OF 43'-8". |
| | NO FOAM ABOVE 40'-0". |
| | 1406.2.2 ARCHITECTURAL TRIM. |
| | IN BUILDINGS OF TYPE I, II, III AND IV CONSTRUCTION |
| | THAT DO NOT EXCEED THREE |
| | STORIES OR 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN HEIGHT |
| | ABOVE GRADE PLANE, EXTERIOR WALL |
| | COVERINGS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED OF WOOD WHERE PERMITTED BY |
| | SECTION 1405.4 OR OTHER EQUIVALENT |
| | COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL. COMBUSTIBLE |
| | EXTERIOR WALL COVERINGS, OTHER THAN |
| | FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED WOOD COMPLYING |
| | WITH SECTION 2303.2 FOR EXTERIOR |
| | INSTALLATION, SHALL NOT EXCEED 10 |
| | PERCENT OF AN EXTERIOR WALL SURFACE AREA |
| | WHERE THE FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE IS 5 |
| | FEET (1524 MM) OR LESS. ARCHITECTURAL |
| | TRIM THAT EXCEEDS 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN |
| | HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLANE SHALL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED OF APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SECURED TO THE |
| | WALL WITH METAL OR OTHER APPROVED |
| | NONCOMBUSTIBLE BRACKETS. |
| | |
| | 27) S3 DETAIL# 3 PLANS INDICATE THE TIE |
| | IN OF NEW STEEL STUD WALL OVER THE TOP |
| | OF EXISTING BLOCK WALL. IT APPEARS THAT |
| | NOT ONLY A STEEL BOTTOM PLATE BUT A 2X |
| | PLATE IS ALSO INSTALLED. IS THIS PLATE |
| | SEGMENTED BETWEEN THE STUDS? THE SECOND |
| | ISSUE IS THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE |
| | TAPCON TO BE USED IS A 1/4"X2 1/2" ONLY |
| | PROVIDING NOT MORE THAN ONE INCH INTO |
| | THE CONCRETE, WHICH SHEET OF |
| | CALCULATIONS PROVIDES THIS INFORMATION? |
| | |
| | 28) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | . |
