Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06061761
Permit Number 06061761
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2006-09-01 00:00:00****** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW *******
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
 PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW AS THEY ARE TAKEN
 DIRECTLY FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES BELOW PREVIOUS
 NOTES.
  
  
 1) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE PLANS
 ARE NOT ATTACHED INTO SETS. ALL SHEETS
 ARE LOOSE AND NOT FASTENED TOGETHER.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS A STANDING NOTE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE KNOW, ONCE ALL REVIEWS
 ARE DONE AND BEFORE RSUBMITTING PLANS
 ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHALL BE
 COMPLETELTY REMOVED FROM SETS AND ONLY
 THE NEW REVISED SHEETS SHALL BE INSERTED
 INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND
 STAMPING. ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED
 REMOVED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED AS
 REFERENCE.
 106.1 ADMIN SECT FBC.
  
 2) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE TITLE BLOCKS FOR
 ARCHITECTURAL FIRM IS STILL MISSING THE
 REQUIRED FIRM LICENSE NUMBER WHICH IS
 ALSO KNOWN AS THE "CERITIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER".
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE MISSING 'PRINTED
 NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER FOR THE
 ARCHITECT. 61G1-16.004, FS 481.219
  
 **PLEASE ALSO SEE UPON VERIFICATION OF
 LICENSING FOR THE ENGINEERING FIRM, THE
 NAME OF COMPANY AS LISTED ON TITLE
 BLOCKS FOR MEP'S AND AS LICENSED WITH
 THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
 PROFESSIONAL REGULATIONS DOES NOT
 CORRELATE. PLEASE SEE COPY OF PRINT OUT
 FROM DPBR. PLEASE KNOW, THIS WAS
 CONFIRMED WITH THE STATE'S LEGAL COUNSEL
 TO THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER'S.
 61G15-23.002, FS 471.023 (ENG'S)
  
 ** THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND
 FOR ALL SHEETS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS
 MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE MISSING INFORMATION
 REQUIRED ON TITLE BLOCKS FOR
 ARCHITECTURAL FIRM AS REQUIRED UNDER
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G1-16.004
 AND FLORIDA STATUES 481.219
 PLEASE SEE MISSING CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER, PRINTED NAME AND
 PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER FOR SAID
 ARCHITECT ALSO.
 PLEASE KNOW, THIS IS REQUIRED ON ALL
 PLANS AND FOR ALL SHEETS CONTAINING THIS
 TITLE BLOCK WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS
 MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 3) NOTE: OK.
  
 4) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME
 CODE ARTICLE NUMBERS AS SHOWN IN NOTES
 ETC ARE NOT FROM THE CURRENT NEC, 2002.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE THAT ALL THE CURRENT
 CODES ARE REFLECTED AS ADOPTED BY THE
 STATE OF FLORIDA. PLEASE SEE THE
 FOLLOWING SHALL BE INDICATED ON PLANS.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE SOME CODES REFLECTED ON
 PLANS ARE FROM THE "1996" NEC.
 PLEASE REF; 2002 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72,
 2003 NFPA-101, AND 2004 FBC.
  
 5) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE FOR
 THE SERVICE IS NOTED, HOWEVER PLEASE
 KNOW THIS IS A NEW TENAT SPACE BEING
 DERIVED FROM THE EXISTING MAIN SERVICE
 TO THE BUILDING. THE INFORMATION FOR THE
 EXISTING METER AND MAIN ETC IS "NOT" ON
 PREVIOUS PLANS AS THIS IS A NEW SPACE
 BEING CREATED.
 PLEASE COMPLETE RISER INCLUDING
 INFORMATION FOR NEW METER WITH "FLATING
 NEUTRAL", SIZE, AND MAINETC.
 PLEASE KNOW, THE RISER AS SHOWN SHOWS
 SERVICE TO THIS SPACE AS BEING
 UN-METERED FROM THE LAND LORDS MAIN
 PANEL, YET THIS IS NOT HOW SERVICE IS AT
 BUILDING OR HOW NEW SERVICE IS PROVIDED.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING METERING FOR SPACE
 ETC.
 PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS BELOW WITH
 RESPECT TO LOADS AND AIC RATINGS.
 230.70,230.72, 240.4,310.16 ETC.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE THE PERMIT FOR
 CREATING THIS TENANT SPACE SHOWS THE HV
 277/480V ELECTRICAL PANEL BEING
 INSTALLED BY THEM.??
 IN EITHER CASE, AFTER COORDINATION ON
 DESIGNERS BEHALF, IF THIS SCOPE OF WORK
 IS GOING TO INCLUDE THE INSTALATION OF
 PANEL INTO TENANT SPACE. PLEASE IDENTIFY
 THE EXISTING LOAD ON THE 1200A MAIN
 SHOWN ALONG WITH NEW LOAD OF THIS
 TENANT.
 PLEASE INCLUDE THE CONDUCTORS FROM
 GUTTER TO METER, METER TO MAIN ETC.
 IF THE PANEL "H" WHICH IS SHOWN ON THESE
 PLANS OR PANEL "A" WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE
 OTHER IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED UNDER
 THIS PERMIT PLEASE REVISE.
 PLEASE INDICATE BY NOTE THAT A
 "FLOATING NEUTRAL" SHALL BE INSTALLED.
 250.6,250.24B,310.16,240.4, 215.5, ETC
  
 6) NOTE: NO, AS NOTED ABOVE. IT WAS KNOW
 TO THIS OFFICE OF THE RATINGS SHOWN FOR
 PANEL "H" AND PANEL "L". THIS COMMENT
 WAS FOR THE NEW MAIN FOR SPACE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE INDICATE THE AIC RATING
 FOR NEW MAIN.
 110.9.
  
 7) NOTE: OK.
  
 8) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THIS IS THE SAME
 NOTE, PLEASE SEE SOME INFORMATION ON
 PANELS IS VERY FAINT.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULES AND
 RISER AS MANY ITEMS ARE VERY LIGHT IN
 THE PRINT ANDNOT EASILY READABLE.
 PLEASE BE SURE PLANS ARE RE-PRINTED TO
 BE CLEAR AND VISABLE.
 106.1.3 ADMIN SECT
  
 9) NOTE: OK.
  
 10) NOTE: OK.
  
 11) NOTE: OK.
  
 12) NOTE: OK.
  
 13) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE A CONTACTOR IS
 BEING SHOWN, HOWEVER COMPLIANCE FOR THE
 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13 STILL NEEDS TO BE
 SHOWN. PLEASE SEE MISSIGN OVER-RIDES
 LOCATED IN AREAS IN EGRESS/INGRESS INTO
 SPACE, LOCATIONS SO THE OCCUPANT CAN SEE
 ALL LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED/OVER-RIDEN
 ETC.
 PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED
 FOR THE OVER-RIDE DEVICES, ALL OR
 DEVICES SHALL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF AS
 PRE-DETERMINED BY THE CODE. TIMES WERE
 GIVEN ON PREVIOUS REVIEW.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING LIGHTING DENSITIES
 ETC.
 NO CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED FOR NEW
 SPACE.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2,.1.3,
 13-415.1.AB.1,13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES FOR
 LPD'S, 415.2.C1, 415.2.B.1 ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW, ALL CODES WERE NOTE GIVEN,
 HOWEVER REFERENCE TO THE 2004 FBC
 CHAPTER 13 WAS GIVEN.
 PLEASE KNOW, THE LC PANELBEING SHOWN
 IS OK, HOWEVER SEE OTHER ITEMS AS NOTED.
 PLEASE KNOW, COULD NOT LOCATE THE TIME
 SCHEDULING.
  
 **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13,
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3.
 PLEASE SHOW THE TIME SCHEDULING, THE
 LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED OVER RIDES
 DEVICES, AND THE TYPE OF PROPOSED OVER
 RIDE DEVICES.
 PLEASE KNOW, IF A TIMER TYPE, A MAX OF
 4HRS SHALL BE INDICATED. IF AN OCC
 SENSORS, MOTION TYPE DEVICE ETC IS BEING
 SHOWN , A MAX TIME OF 30 MINS SHALL BE
 INDICATED.
  
 14) NOTE: OK.
  
 15) NOTE: OK.
  
 *** NEW NOTE **
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW, ANY "LOCK OFF
 DEVICE" SHALL BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE
 CIRCUIT BREAKER. PLEASE KNOW MANY OF THE
 "SNAP/CLIP- ON " TYPES DO NOT MEET CODE
 COMPLIACNE, LISTING OR ARE ACCEPTABLE TO
 THIS AHJ.
 PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS FOR THE LOCK
 OFF DEVICE BEING PART OF THE BREAKER.
 FBC106.1.2
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH
 RESPECT TO THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
 THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS
 TIME.
  
  
 PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES
 WHICH MAY HAVE AN AFFECT ON ELECTRICAL
 PLANS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved