| Plan Review Notes For Permit 06061475 |
| Permit Number |
06061475 |
|
| Review Stop |
E |
| Sequence Number |
5 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2007-05-08 17:12:34 | ** UNSAT ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE REVIEW NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | AND NOTES AS REDLINED ON PROVISO AS NOTED ON PLANS | | | ISSUED FOR PERMIT. | | | PLEASE SEE THE TEXT BELOW WHICH WAS SENT TO THE | | | ENGINEER VIA E-MAIL. | | | | | | | | | | | | MR. STEWART, | | | | | | UPON REVIEWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE TWO DISCONNECTS ON | | | PLANS. THE LOCATIONS ARE TOO FAR APART AND CAN NOT BE | | | ACCEPTED. | | | PLEASE SEETHAT A DISCONNECT WOULD BE REQUIRED AT A | | | LOCATION CLOSER AND IN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE EXISTING | | | DISCONNECT FOR THIS BUILDING. THIS IS WHAT WAS REDLINED | | | AS A "PROVISO" ON ORIGINAL PLANS. WHEN WE SPOKE ON THE | | | PHONE I DID NOT HAVE THE PLANS, AND CAN NOW SEE HOW FAR | | | THESE DISCONNECTS ACTUALLY ARE. MY DECISIONS IS THE | | | SAME AS ON ORIGINAL REDLINED PLANS AND REVIEW UNDER THE | | | PERMIT THAT THESE ARE TOO FAR APART. | | | I CAN NOT ACCEPT THE SIGNAGE IN LIEU OF GROUPING THE | | | DISCONNECTS FOR THIS BUILDING. | | | MY NOTES AS STATED PREVIOUSLY WITH RESPECT TO MEETING | | | EXCEPTION STILL WOULD STAND IF THAT METHOD/OPTION IT | | | TAKEN. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
|
