| Date |
Text |
| 2007-02-25 08:25:02 | *** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW *** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTED SHEET E-2 IS |
| | THE SAME SHEET |
| | |
| | |
| | ** |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT PERMIT APPLICATION HAS ONLY |
| | NOW BEEN MADE AND IT IS AFTER THE NEW CODES HAVE GONE |
| | INTO EFFECT. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE ALL PLANS REFLECT THE LATEST ADOPTED |
| | CODES PER THE STATE OF FLORIDA. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | FOLLOWING WHICH ARE CURRENTLY ADOPTED AS OF DECEMBER |
| | 8TH, 2006. |
| | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISION. (THIS WILL AFFECT PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED). |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 (NEC). |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 |
| | ** THESE CODES ARE REQUIRED AT A MINIMUM FOR THIS TRADE |
| | REVIEWER; OTHERS MAY BE REQUIRED PER OTHER TRADES OR |
| | REVIEWER(S). |
| | PLEASE SEE THERE ARE MANY AREAS ON THE PLANS WHICH |
| | REFERENCE OLDER CODES FROM PREVIOUS CODES, THESE SHOULD |
| | BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC W/2006 FOR NOTE REQUIRED |
| | FOR TYPE OF RECESSED LIGHTING FIXTURES PER |
| | 13-606.1.ABC.1.2.4 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE DUE TO THE SHEET E-2 BEING THE |
| | EXACT SAME SHEET SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY WITH NO REVISIONS |
| | MADE, PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ALL COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW(S) AND SEE REDLINED PLANS WHICH ARE STILL IN |
| | SETS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS SHALL BE DONE AND |
| | CODES STATED PER 2005 NEC/ NFPA-70. PLEASE SEE ALL ARE |
| | REFLECTED FROM THE 2002 NEC. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE:PLEASE SEE DUE TO SOME SHEETS BEING THE SAME |
| | SHEETS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW THIS COMMENT STANDS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD AT THE SOUTHERN |
| | SECTION MEETING IN OCT 06 WHERE WE WERE DIRECTLY |
| | INFORMED BY NFPA THAT THE USE OF SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS |
| | ON PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE WHEN |
| | THESE DEVICES ANY ACTUALLY FALL UNDER THE DEFINITIONS |
| | OF SMOKE ALARMS WHICH WOULD BE SHOWN AS SA/SMOKE |
| | ALARMS. |
| | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEW TO THIS AHJ AS THE GENERAL USE |
| | OF THE SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WAS ALWAYS ACCEPTED. |
| | BY THE DEFINITIONS AS STATED IN NFPA-72 A SD/ SMOKE |
| | DETECTOR IS ONLY A DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND WILL |
| | NOT SOUND AN AUDIBLE ALARM. THIS WOULD BE DONE BY |
| | HORN/SIREN TYPE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF |
| | SA/SMOKE ALARMS; THESE ARE DEVICES WHICH ARE 120V (AS |
| | SHOWN) AND WOULD DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM. THIS IS |
| | SOMETHING THAT IS NOW BEING COMMENTED ON OTHER REVIEWS |
| | FOR OTHER NEW HOMES. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SMOKE ALARMS ARE STATED IN THE FBC |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE/ FBC AND IN NFPA-72. |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMENT PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO |
| | THE NUMBER OF SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS WHICH ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE FIGURED INTO THE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER |
| | 210.52B1, 220.52, 210.11C1. THE ONLY SECTION WHICH WAS |
| | DIFFERENT ON PREVIOUS NOTES WAS 220.52 WHICH USED TO BE |
| | 220.16. THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT MADE ON PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS. PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER ALL OF THESE TYPES |
| | OF CIRCUITS AND REVISE LOAD CALCULATIONS. (NOT ALL ARE |
| | INCLUDED AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND PANEL SCHEDULES). |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL *B* WHICH IS SHOWN AS 100AMPS |
| | AND 42 CIRCUIT. PLEASE VERIFY THIS AS 100AMPS PANELS |
| | ARE NOT MADE WITH 42CIRCUITS. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE PANEL *C* WHICH IS SHOWN AS 20 POLES |
| | AND 42 POLES? |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE EQUIPMENT. 110.3, 90.7. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE SECTION/DATE STATED ON |
| | PLANS WHICH LISTS THE LOAD CALCULATIONS PER A DATE OF |
| | 9/25/1997? PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE |
| | CURRENT CODE OF 2005 NFPA-70. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE LOADS SHOWN FOR PANEL *C* ON |
| | PANEL *A* SCHEDULE WITH THAT OF THE LOAD SHOWN ON PANEL |
| | *C*. |
| | 220. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ALL LOADS ON PANEL SCHEDULES |
| | WITH LOADS ON LOAD SUMMARY AND LOADS ON LOADS |
| | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL WHICH DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE. PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT ALL LOADS ARE PERMITTED |
| | TO ROUND UP, BUT NOT PERMITTED TO ROUND DOWN. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME LOADS ARE AS MUCH AS 800VA MORE ON |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE THAN IN LOAD CALCULATIONS ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE 2005 NEC 220. |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.3.4 |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 489 PART I AS IT APPEARS PERMIT |
| | IS BEING APPLIED FOR AS OWNER/BUILDER YETHOMESTEAD |
| | AND RESISIDENCE IS ANOTHER LOCATION. PLEASE KNOW THAT |
| | DOCUMENTATION MAY BE REQUIREDFOR O/B IS MOVING INOT |
| | NEW RESIDENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE COMMENT S FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | AS SOME MAY STILL APPLY OR CORRELATE WITH THESE PLANS |
| | FOR SHEET E-2. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW AS PLANS WERE ONLY SUBMITTED FOR **PLAN |
| | REVIEW** THE FIRST TWO TIMES, FS 553.80(2)(B) DOES NOT |
| | APPLY. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-02-25 07:53:59 | 2007-02-25 07:53:59 |
| | REVIEW CONTINUED |
