| Date |
Text |
| 2006-07-24 00:00:00 | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THE INSTALLATION RREPORT (APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY)IS MISSING FROM FL#985-RI. |
| | SUBMIT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY FROM THE |
| | PACKAGE. SEE PAGES 39-43. THIS ROOF IS |
| | ALSO MISSING OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE FOLLOW ITEMS: |
| | |
| | _XX__ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE |
| | WHICH SYSTEM TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | _XX__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW |
| | PRESSURE FOR ZONE _3__ . |
| | |
| | _XX__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES |
| | LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER |
| | RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT |
| | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED |
| | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF |
| | CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | _XX__THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES |
| | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED |
| | |
| | |
| | 3)GENERAL LIMITATION #9 PROHIBITS |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS OR EXTRAPOLATION TO |
| | ENHANCE THE UPLIFT PRESSURE AT PERIMETER |
| | AND CORNER AREAS BY REDUCING THE |
| | FASTENER SPACING IN THESE AREAS.EITHER |
| | SELECT AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM (OR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL) THAT DOES NOT CITE GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #9.ALTERNATIVELY IF THE |
| | SELECTED SYSTEM DOES CITE GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #9, IT MUST HAVE A MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE THAT EXCEEDS THE |
| | PRESSURE IN ROOF ZONE 3 (TYPICALLY -89 |
| | PSF FOR MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 30 FEET OR |
| | LESS). |
| | |
| | |
| | MYRON JACOBS |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER |
| | TEL:(561)805-6726 |
