| Date |
Text |
| 2006-08-04 00:00:00 | PERMIT: 06051007 |
| | ADD: 2001 PALM BCH LAKES BLVD. |
| | CONT: RIZNICK CONSTRUCTION |
| | TEL: ( )584-0363 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2) 2ND REQUEST: MISSING SOILS REPORT, |
| | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. |
| | WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE |
| | SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A |
| | LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT |
| | SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE |
| | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH |
| | INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH |
| | 1802.6 . |
| | |
| | 3) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3B) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3C)MISSING MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA: |
| | 3C)(B) PROPOSED USE: SHEET A-1 |
| | PROJECT DATA SUMMARY, THE DESIGNER IS |
| | NOT DISTINGIUSHING BETWEEN THE ZONING |
| | AND BUILDING TERMINOLOGY. ONCE THE |
| | DESIGNER STARTS TO LIST BUILDING CODE |
| | EDITION, THE TERMINOLOGY WILL BE AS WHAT |
| | IS REQUIRED IN SECTION 110.1.2*PROPOSED |
| | USE BUSINESS "GROUP B" SEE 304.1. |
| | |
| | 3D) OCCUPANT LOAD: SEE TABLE 1004.1.4 |
| | BUISINESS AREAS/ 100 GROSS |
| | |
| | 3B)(E-I) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3D) 2ND REQUEST: |
| | 3D) MISSING THE WIND DESIGN INTERNAL |
| | PRESSURE COEFFICIENT WHEN DESIGNED TO |
| | ASCE 7-02. 1603.1.4(4) THE APPLICABLE |
| | ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATIONS AND, IF |
| | DESIGNING WITH ASCE 7, INTERNAL PRESSURE |
| | COEFFICIENT. |
| | THE STATEMENT ABOVE MAY BE ABIT |
| | MISLEADING. THE FIRST REVIEW THE PLANS |
| | CAME INDICATING THEY ERE DESIGNED TO |
| | ASCE 7-98. THE STATEMENT THAT I WAS |
| | TRYINF TO MAKE IS (2) FOLD. |
| | (I) THE DESIGNER HAS THE OPTION TO |
| | DESIGN TO EITHER ASCE 7-02 OR TSKE THE |
| | EXCEPTION (1) AND DESIGN TO 1609.6. |
| | (II) IF THE DESIGNER DOES DESIGN TO |
| | ASCE 7-02 THE TERM THAT SHOULD OF BEEN |
| | USED IS "ENCLOSURE CLASSIFICATION"NOT |
| | INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT. |
| | THIS BUILDING WHEN DESIGNED TO ASCE |
| | 7-02 SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS EITHER |
| | PARTIALLY OPEN OR OPEN. |
| | SEE SECTION 6.5.12 FOR PARTIALLY OPEN |
| | AND THE COEFFICIENT, IF THE OPEN |
| | CLASSIFICATION (SEE 6.5.13) IS |
| | APPLICABLE USE THE CORRECT COEFFICIENT. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST, 4) PROVIDE ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION, PERMIT APPLICATION PROJECT |
| | DESCRIPTION, IS ONLY FOR DRIVE THROUGH |
| | AND NOT LANDSCAPING, REPAVING OR CURBING |
| | OR STRIPING OF THE CURRENT SITE? IF SO |
| | INCLUDE UNDER PERMIT DESCPTION. |
| | |
| | 5) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 6) 2ND REQUEST,A-2/ A-3 BOTH INDICATE |
| | THE USE OF (2), NOW(4) SCUPPERS ON THE |
| | EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS, PLANS DO NOT |
| | INDICATE OVERFLOW SCUPPERS. 1503.4.3 |
| | WHEN OTHER MEANS OF DRAINAGE OF OVERFLOW |
| | WATER IS NOT PROVIDED, OVERFLOW SCUPPERS |
| | SHALL BE PLACED IN WALLS OR PARAPETS NOT |
| | LESS THAN 2 INCHES (51 MM) NOR MORE THAN |
| | 4 INCHES (102 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED |
| | ROOF COVERING AND SHALL BE LOCATED AS |
| | CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO REQUIRED VERTICAL |
| | LEADERS OR DOWNSPOUTS OR WALL AND |
| | PARAPET SCUPPERS. AN OVERFLOW SCUPPER |
| | SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING. |
| | A-4 NOW INDICATES THERE ARE (4) |
| | THROUGH THE WALL SCUPPERS SHOWN ON A-4. |
| | I BELIEVE THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN |
| | UNDERSTANDING OF TERMINOLGY IN THIS CODE |
| | SECTION. |
| | SEE 1503.4.2 SCUPPERS: WHERE REQUIRED |
| | FOR ROOF DRAINAGE, A SCUPPER SHALL BE |
| | PLACED "LEVEL" WITH THE ROOF SURFACE IN |
| | A WALL OR PARAPET. THE SCUPPER SHALL BE |
| | LOCATED AS DETERMINED BY THE SLOPE AND |
| | THE CONTRIBUTING AREA OF THE ROOF. THE |
| | EXTERIOR FACING OR LINING OF A SCUPPER, |
| | IF METAL, SHALL BE THE SAME AS FLASHING |
| | MATERIAL REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 1503 |
| | THROUGH 1510 FOR THE PARTICULAR TYPE OF |
| | COVERING SPECIFIED FOR THE BUILDING. FOR |
| | OTHER TYPE MATERIALS, FOLLOW |
| | MANUFACTURER?S SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | THE CODE SECTION STATED IN 1503.4.3 |
| | IS THE REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL |
| | OVERFLOW SCUPPERS IN CASE THE SCUPPERS |
| | LOCATED AT THE ROOF LEVEL ARE BLOCKED. |
| | FOR EACH SCUPPER AN ADDITIONAL OVERFLOW |
| | SCUPPER WILL BE REQUIRED, LOCATED WITH |
| | THE BOTTOM OF THE SCUPPER LOCATED |
| | BETWEEN 2"-4" ABOVE THE FINISHED ROOF. |
| | |
| | 7) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 8) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-3 NOTE FOR USE |
| | OF ALTERNATE MATERIALS FOR CEILING |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | PROVIDE ADDTIONAL INFORMATION ON THE |
| | TYPE OF WIRE LATH TO BE USED? |
| | 2510.3INSTALLATION OF THESE MATERIALS |
| | SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASTM C 926 |
| | AND ASTM C 1063. |
| | RULE 9B-72 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR "PROROC |
| | EXTERIOR SOFFIT BOARD W/ FLORIDA STATE |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | 104.1.1* ALTERNATE MATERIALS, DESIGN |
| | & METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION & EQUIPMENT. |
| | THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE ARE NOT |
| | INTENDED TO PREVENT THE INSTALLATION OF |
| | ANY MATERIAL OR TO PROHIBIT ANY DESIGN |
| | OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION NOT |
| | SPECIFICALLY PRESCRIBED BY THIS CODE, |
| | PROVIDED THAT ANY SUCH ALTERNATIVE HAS |
| | BEEN APPROVED. AN ALTERNATE MATERIAL, |
| | DESIGN OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL |
| | BE APPROVED WHERE THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | FINDS THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN IS |
| | SATISFACTORY AND COMPLIES WITH THE |
| | INTENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE, |
| | AND THAT THE MATERIAL, METHOD OR WORK |
| | OFFERED IS, FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, AT |
| | LEAST THE EQUIVALENT OF THAT PRESCRIBED |
| | IN THIS CODE IN QUANITY, STRENGTH, |
| | EFFECTIVENESS FIRE RESISTANCE, |
| | DURABILITY AND SAFETY. WHEN ALTERNATE |
| | LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED, THE |
| | SFPE ENGINEERING GUIDE TO |
| | PERFORMANCE-BASED FIRE PROTECTION |
| | ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BUILDINGS , OR |
| | OTHER METHODS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL MAY BE USED. THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT SUFFICIENT |
| | EVIDENCE OR PROOF BE SUBMITTED TO |
| | SUBSTANTIATE ANY CLAIM MADE REGARDING |
| | THE ALTERNATIVE. |
| | SHEET A-3 STILL INDICATES AN |
| | ALTERNATE SYSTEM, EVEN THOUGH DESIGN |
| | TEAM COMMENT SHEET INDICATES 2.5# |
| | GALVANIZED EXPANDED METAL DIAMOND MESH. |
| | SHEET S1OF 2 DETAIL SECTION1/S-1, |
| | INDICATES THE USE OF 1X FURRING AT 2'-0" |
| | O.C. SEE ASTM C1063 TABLE 3 TYPES AND |
| | WEIGHTS OF METAL PLASTER BASES AND |
| | CORRESPONDING MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE |
| | SPACING OF SUPPORTS.CEILINGS, WOOD |
| | ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT TO SPAN MORE THAN 12" |
| | O.C. |
| | |
| | 9)2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.6.2.1: |
| | COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A) TRUSS ANCHORS |
| | B) PANEL WALLS- SOFFITS- PROROC |
| | EXTERIOR SOFFIT BOAARD. |
| | C) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES |
| | |
| | NOTE: WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | NOTE ROOFING NOA, SYSTEMS LIMITATIONS VS |
| | ENHANCED FASTENING!!!!! |
| | |
| | 10) 2ND REQUEST, PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER |
| | OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY |
| | WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE |
| | STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS |
| | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 11) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 12) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 14) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 15) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 16) 2ND REQUEST, |
| | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT |
| | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
