| Date |
Text |
| 2006-05-22 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | ROOFING PERMIT; ONLY CHECKED ITEMS APPLY |
| | |
| | |
| | _XX_1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| | MUST BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS |
| | BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | _XX_2.)CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE THE |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ON THE APPLICATION. |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FBC1609.2 IS DEFINED AS |
| | "THE AVERAGE OF THE ROOF EAVE HEIGHT AND |
| | THE HEIGHT TO THE HIGHTEST POINT ON THE |
| | ROOF SURFACE . . . "THE STATED MRH OF |
| | 9' IS NOT CORRECT, PLEASE REVISE.IF IT |
| | IS LESS THAN 30', YOU MAY PROVIDE "<30'" |
| | RATHER THAN THE EXACT HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | _XX_3.)CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE THE |
| | ROOF PITCH ON THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | _XX_4.)CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE THE |
| | ROOF DECK TYPE ON THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | _XX_5.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO |
| | THE EVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTED, |
| | FAC9B72.WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | I HAVE PRINTED THIS FOR YOU; PLEASE |
| | RETAIN IN THE PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | ____6.)FOR THE FLAT DECK, SELECT THE |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY YOU ARE USING. |
| | |
| | ____7.)THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW |
| | PRESSURE FOR ZONE ____. |
| | |
| | ____8.)THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES |
| | LIMITATION #9, ENHANCED FASTENING NOT |
| | ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | ____9.)PROVIDE AN ENGINEER?S LETTER |
| | TO CONFIRM THAT THE ROOF WHICH CURRENTLY |
| | HAS SHINGLES INSTALLED CAN ACCOMMODATE |
| | THE ADDITIONAL WEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | TILE. |
| | |
| | ____ 10.)ON THE TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | INDICATE WHICH METHOD OF ATTACHMENT YOU |
| | ARE USING. |
| | |
| | _XX_ 11.)THE PERMIT APPLICATION STATES |
| | THAT THIS IS A ROOF OVER.THIS IS NOT |
| | INCLUDED IN THE PAPERWORK PROVIDED. THE |
| | APPLICATION IS TO CLEARLY STATE THE |
| | SCOPE OF WORK. IF YOU PROVIDE A STATE OR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WHICH IS FOR A |
| | ROOF OVER, REVISE THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | TO STATE WHAT THE EXISTING ROOF COVERING |
| | IS. |
| | |
| | _XX_ 12.)THE HOUSE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED |
| | ARE NOT REQUIRED.HOWEVER, IF YOU WISH |
| | FOR THIS TO BE A PART OF THE PERMIT |
| | PACKAGE, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN |
| | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD |
| | ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED |
| | ORIGINALS FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | _XX_13.)IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE |
| | TWO DIFFERENT ROOF PITCH AREAS, ONE FOR |
| | THE HIP, ONE FOR THE GABLE AREA. |
| | PROVIDE BOTH. |
| | |
| | _XX_ 14.)WITHOUT THE EXISTING ROOF |
| | PITCH, CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE |
| | DETERMINED.IT APPEARS THAT ENGINEERING |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ENHANCED FASTENING |
| | FOR ZONES 2 AND 3.THE SYSTEM HAS A |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATION OF -52.5. |
| | SEE ATTACHED FBC TABLE 1609.6B. |
| | |
