| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-13 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL REQUIRED, FAC9B72.THE STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS EXPIRED (2001 CODE |
| | RATHER THAN FBC2004). |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.SEE COMMENT 3 BELOW. |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3.)THE NOA STATES THAT THE PRODUCT |
| | SPECIFIED IS FOR USE OVER STEEL FRAMING. |
| | THE CBAA PAPERWORK INDICATES THAT THIS |
| | IS OVER WOOD FRAMING.ENGINEERING, WITH |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL APPLICATION, IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.PLEASE SUBMIT LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL APPLICATION FAC9B72, |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. |
| | |
| | ALSO SUBMIT LEGIBLE MIAMI-DADE NOAS. |
| | THE NOAS SUBMITTED ARE DIFFICULT TO |
| | READ. |
| | |
| | 4.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 5.)THE CBAA CASE AND PAPERWORK |
| | INCLUDED REFER TO WORK WHICH IS NOT |
| | WITHIN THE SCOPE OF A CCC LICENSE: FIRE |
| | SPRINKLERS, FIREPROOFING OF STRUCTURAL |
| | ELEMENTS, REPAIR OF WOOD FRAMING.THE |
| | PLANS WHICH YOU WILL SUBMIT SHOULD MAKE |
| | CLEAR THE SCOPE OF WORK UNDER THIS |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION.PROVIDE APPLICATION |
| | NUMBERS OF THE OTHER WORK ASSOCIATED |
| | WITH THIS PROJECT, OR APPLY UNDER A |
| | CONTRACTOR LICENSED TO OVERSEE ALL WORK |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | AS DISCUSSED, HAVE A GENERAL CONTRACTOR |
| | (OR OTHER CONTRACTOR LICENSED TO PERFORM |
| | THE WORK) APPLY. AS DISCUSSED, THIS CAN |
| | BE DONE WITH A CHANGE OF CONTRACTOR. |
| | THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR WILL APPLY AS A |
| | SUBCONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | 6.)AS NO PLANS WERE SUBMITTED, CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED.BASED |
| | ON THE FORMULA ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | THIS PRODUCT DOES NOT MEET THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE LIMITATION FOR ZONES 2 AND 3 |
| | FOR A ROOF 0- 10 DEGREES. |
| | |
| | NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED.DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES WERE NOT PROVIDED BY THE |
| | ENGINEER, AND CONFLICTING INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED IN REGARDS TO THE ROOF PITCH. |
| | |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE LIMITATIONS FOR THE |
| | PRODUCT ARE NOT CLEAR.THE PRODUCT |
| | CONTAINS A FORMULA TO DETERMINE UPLIFT |
| | DP.ACCORDING TO THE FORMULA, DP IS |
| | -35.37, NOT COMPLIANT FOR COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING.I HAVE LEFT A MESSAGE WITH |
| | THE MANUFACTURER FOR CLARIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 7.)DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS, FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 8.)IS THERE A WOOD DECK IN ADDITION TO |
| | THE WOOD FRAMING?EXISTING CONDITIONS |
| | ARE NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | CBAA ORDER REFERS TO WOOD FRAMING.THIS |
| | IS NOT SHOWN ON THE ENGINEER'S PLAN. |
| | PROVIDE FRAMING INFORMATION (MATERIAL |
| | AND SPACING) SO THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN |
| | BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 9.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | FBC1603.1.4, INCLUDING DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR THE ROOF. |
| | |
| | 10.) ON THE APPLICATION, CONTRACTOR |
| | STATES THAT THE ROOF PITCH IS 1/12.THE |
| | DRAWINGS SHOW 2 1/2/12.CLARIFY THE |
| | DISCREPANCY.DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | DIFFER FOR THE TWO DIFFERENT CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 11.)THE 60 MINUTE FIRE SPEC TEST WAS |
| | OVER DOUGLAS FIR PLYWOOD; THE ENGINEER'S |
| | DRAWING SHOWS THE PRODUCT OVER |
| | INSULATION.THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO |
| | PROVIDE THE 1 HOUR PROTECTION REQUIRED |
| | BY THE CBAA ORDER. |
| | |
| | 12.)THE NOC IS FOR REROOF ONLY.A NEW |
| | NOC WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13.)PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE |
| | TU PLUS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEER'S DRAWING |
| | (METAL UNDERLAYMENT). |
| | |
| | 14.)IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW DETAIL A, 1/2, |
| | FLASHING AT WALL, WILL KEEP WATER FROM |
| | GETTING UNDER WHAT THE PLAN CALLS |
| | "PHILADELPHIA FLASHING", FBC1503.2. |
