| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-06 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW, NOT |
| | ADDRESSED; NUMBERING REMAINING THE SAME |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - OVER 90 DAYS WITHOUT |
| | COMMENCING WORK, 713.13.PLEASE REFILE. |
| | THIS COMMENT MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO |
| | PERMIT PICKUP BUT DOES NOT PREVENT THE |
| | PERMIT FROM BEING ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2.)THE CALCS ARE TO HAVE ALL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 |
| | ON EACH SHEET. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3.)GOVERNING CODE IS FBC2004 EFFECTIVE |
| | OCTOBER 1, 2005. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.PLANS |
| | DECLARE FBC2001 HIGH VELOCITY.THIS IS |
| | NOT HIGH VELOCITY ZONE.HVHZ IS NOT |
| | ALWAYS MORE STRINGENT.PLANS ARE TO |
| | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNING |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | 4.)CORRECT ASCE7 REFERENCE IS 02, NOT |
| | 98, FBC35. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.STILL STATES ASCE7-98. |
| | |
| | 5-12.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 13.)CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE |
| | -74 PSF FOR ZONE 3, 500 SF, AND -78 FOR |
| | 300 SF.YOU HAVE USED THE -74 DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE, BUT WHY IS THERE A MORE |
| | CONSERVATIVE NUMBER ON ANOTHER SHEET |
| | WHEN THE INFORMATION IS SPECIFIC TO THIS |
| | JOB? |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.THERE ARE |
| | STILL DIFFERENT PRESSURE CONDITIONS ON |
| | THE COMPUTERIZED ENGINEERING.THE OLD |
| | ENGINEERING SHOWED A 25' HIGH, 146X44 |
| | BUILDING.THE NEW ENGINEERING SHOWS A |
| | 15' HIGH, 30X12 BUILDING.PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER SHOWS SIX UNITS IN THIS |
| | BUILDING.CLARIFY DISCREPANCY IN |
| | BUILDING SIZE AS WELL AS THE DIFFERENCE |
| | IN PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 14.)CLARIFY WHY YOU HAVE USED 9.3 |
| | INCHES FOR THE ROW SPACING IN THE |
| | CALCULATIONS.THE EXAMPLE IN THE BOOK, |
| | SAME CONDITIONS (36" SHEET, 4"LAP, 3 |
| | ROWS) HAS A 10.67IN ROW SPACING.THE |
| | DIFFERENCE CHANGES THE FASTENING FOR |
| | ZONE 3 FROM 4.23 TO 3.5 FOR TWO ROWS, OR |
| | 4.7 FOR 3 ROWS. |
| | |
| | 15.)THE ENGINEERING HAS BEEN SENT TO |
| | FBPE. |
| | |
| | 16.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
