Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 06050526
Permit Number 06050526
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2006-06-28 00:00:00 
  
 DENIED
  
 1) A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION SHALL
 BE REQUIRED FOR A CORPORATION, LIMITED
 LIABILITY COMPANY, OR PARTNERSHIP,
 OFFERING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO THE
 PUBLIC JOINTLY OR SEPARATELY.
 PER 481.219(2) F.S.
  
 2) WIND DESIGN CRITERIA SHALL CARRY
 RVISED REFERENCE STANDARD 7-02
  
 3) THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES
 COLLECTION OF A RADON SURCHARGE ON ALL
 NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER ROOF
 FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC
  
 4) THE SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED ADDITION
 SHOWS THE NGVD BASE FLOOD ELEVATION AS
 7' THE CITY CODE REQUIRES THE FLOOR
 ELEVATION TO BE 6" ABOVE THIS LEVEL. PER
 CITY CODES THE EXISTING STRUCTURE MUST
 ALSO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT WHEN THEIR IS
 SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT (MORE THAN 50%
 OF THE VALUE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.)
 SECTION 94-546
  
 5) BEFORE A CO IS ISSUED AN ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED
  
 6) IN AREAS OF QUESTIONABLE SOILS A SOIL
 REPORT IS REQUIRED PER R401.1 FBC
  
 7) THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION ARE REQUIRED
 ON THE PRODUCT APPROVALS
 A) GAF ROOFING: PROVIDE FASTENER SYSTEM
 BEING USED AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 ENHANCED FASTENING FOR PERIMITER ZONE 2
 AND CORNER ZONE 3
 B) CLOPAY GARAGE DOORS: NOA'S DO NOT
 MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES AS STATED IN
 THE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS ON S/3. ALSO
 BOTH NOA'S ARE FOR METAL DOORS AND
 DRAWINGS HAVE WOOD AND ALUMINUM. DOORS
 WITH GLAZING THE GLASS SHALL BE IMPACT
 RATED
 C) MADDEN MFG: SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVALS
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH A KEY PLAN,
 SCEDULE AND THE NOA DRAWING CLEARLY
 MARKED/CIRCLED SHOWING THE COMPONENTS,
 TYPE OF MOUNTING, TYPE OF ANCHOR, ETC
 D) PGT WINDOWS: REQUIRE AN UPDATED
 FLORIDA COVER AND NOA (FL#243-R3 & NOA#
 03-1105.01)
 E) CECO DOORS: NOA STATES A MAXIMUM
 HEIGHT OF 7'-0" AND DRAWING SPECIFY
 7'-6" ON THE DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ON
 A/1.
  
 8) WINDOW SCHEDULE SHOWS WINDOW A AS
 CASEMENT, ELEVATION SHOWS FIXED, NO NOA
 FOR CASEMENT, PLEASE CLARIFY
  
 9) SECTION 05/S1 SHOWS TB2 AND ROOF
 FRAMING PLAN SHOWS TB1 PLEASE CLARIFY,
 ALSO THERE IS NO TB2 ON THE BEAM
 SCHEDULE ON S/2
  
 10) PROVIDE DETAIL ON ATTACHMENT OF 4X10
 BEAM TO POST (ASSUME THERE IS POST UNDER
 THE DECORATIVE WOOD POSTS) IF SO SHOW
 PAD/FOOTING AND ATTACHMENT
  
 11) ALSO CONFIRM WITH THE ENGINEER THAT
 THE SPANS ON 4X10 BEAMS WITH OUTLOOKERS
 WILL BE ADEQUATE AS THE UNSUPPORTED
 SPANS ARE LARGER THAN WOULD BE ALLOWABLE
 FOR BUILT UP BEAMS
  
 12) SCTION 02/S1 AND 03/S1 SEEM SIMILAR
 BUT BEAM ATTACHMENT DETAIL SHOULD BE
 DIFFERENT AT EXISTING GARAGE WALL,
 PLEASE CLARIFY
  
 13) WEST ELEVATION ON A/2 STATES
 DIFFERENT ROOFING APPLICATION THAN NORTH
 ELEVATION AND BUILDING SECTIONS ON A/3
 PLEASE CLARIFY
  
 BLDG PLAN REVIEW
 ADRIAN MORSE
 561-805-6716
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved