| Date |
Text |
| 2006-08-10 00:00:00 | ********* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ***** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTE FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE |
| | ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE COMMENT BELOW ARE |
| | TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE KNOW SOME INFORMATION(SPECS) ARE |
| | ONLY NOW BEING REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW PERMIT APPLICATION WAS |
| | ONCE AGAIN SUBMITTED WITH THE ADDRESS OF |
| | "4826" N. HAVERHILL WHICH IS THE ADDRESS |
| | FOR "COTTAGE #10". PLEASE SEE PLANS NOW |
| | INDICATE "4884" N. HAVERHILL WHICH IS |
| | THE ADDRESS FOR WHAT WAS/IS GOING TO BE |
| | THE ADMIN BLDG. |
| | **PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT IS LOCATED AT THE SOCIAL |
| | BUILDING WHICH IS "4888" N HAVERHILL RD. |
| | |
| | THIS REVIEWER HASPERSONALLY CHANGED |
| | OUR SYSTEM, MOVED PERMITS TO THE "4884" |
| | AND HAS CHANGED THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | TO READ 4888. |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS/TITLE BLOCKS ARE |
| | SHOWING 4884, WHICH WAS GOING TO BE |
| | CHANGED BY HAND HOWEVER PLANS ARE COMING |
| | BACK FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE REVISE AT |
| | THAT TIME. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE SAME SHEET |
| | WAS SUBMITTED BACK FOR SLAB DETAIL, IN |
| | FACT A "COLORED PHOTO-COPY" WAS MADE OF |
| | THE SAME SHEETS WHICH THIS REVIEWER |
| | HIGHLIGHTED AND REDLINED "COPY" . PLEASE |
| | KNOW THIS IS 2ND TIME THIS NOTE IS |
| | STATED THAT ALL PLANS, DETAILS ETC DONE |
| | BY AN ENGINEER SHALL CONTAIN AN ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNATURE, DATE AND SEAL. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT A "RAISED SEAL" OVER A |
| | DOCUMENT WHICH IS A PHOTO-COPY OF THE |
| | ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS |
| | PLEASE CONTACT MR. PAUL MARTIN EXECUTIVE |
| | DIRECTOR FOR THE FLORIDA BOARD OF |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S AND MR. JERRY |
| | ONGLEY INVESTIGATOR TO THE BOARD. THEY |
| | HAVE BEEN CONTACTED ON THIS MATTER AND |
| | PENDING BUILDING OFFICIAL'S RULING, |
| | PLANS WHICH WERE RETAINED ON THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW AND PLANS NOW BEING |
| | RETAINED ON THIS REVIEW MAY BE FORWARDED |
| | TO THE STATE FBPE'S FOR REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-23.002, AND FS |
| | 471.025. PLEASE STILL MISSING LICENSE |
| | NUMBER WHICH WAS NOT AS THE SAME |
| | SHEET(S) WERE SUBMITTED BACK FOR REVIEW. |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS |
| | PLEASE ALSO DO NOT HESITATE IN |
| | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER (# BELOW ) OR |
| | THEDIRECTOR/BUILDING OFFICIALMR. |
| | NEIL MELICK @ 561-805-6654 |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE BE SURE ALL SHEETS |
| | CONTAIN AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. PLEASE |
| | SEE SLAB DETAIL SHEET CONTAINS A RAISED |
| | SEALED OVER A PHOTO-COPIED SIGNATURE FOR |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, ONE COPY IS BEING RETAINED |
| | FOR FILE. |
| | FS 471.025,FAC 61G15-23.002 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: NO, THIS WAS ADJUSTED BY THE |
| | OFFICE BASED ON THE MARSHALL'S /SWIFT |
| | GUIDE WHICH IS ADOPTED BY THE FBC AND |
| | FEES OF $488.80 ARE NOW DUE BEFORE |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE VALUE FOR SCOPE OF |
| | WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND |
| | MATERIALS, EVEN IF ANY EQUIPMENT IS |
| | OWNER SUPPLIED. PLEASE SEE VALUE AT |
| | 30,000 IS WAY LOW FOR SCOPE. |
| | 108.3 FBC |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: OK, SPEC ARE NOW SUBMITTED. |
| | THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THIS OFFICE HAS |
| | REVIEWED SPECS. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SPECS ARE SHOWING A 3-POLE |
| | ATS WHICH DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE |
| | PLANS. PLEASE SEE COMMENT BELOW WITH |
| | RESPECT TO THE "SEPARATELY DERIVED |
| | SYSTEM". |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE SPECS FOR |
| | GENERATOR AND ATS. SPECS FOR GEN WERE |
| | SUBMITTED HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE THE |
| | LISTING FROM A NRTL. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE NO SPECS FOR THE ATS |
| | WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THE GENERATOR |
| | ON PLANS ARE NOW SHOWING A 4-POLE ATS |
| | AND CONDUCTORS FROM THE GEN TO THE |
| | BUILDING IS INDICATING A SD SYSTEM, |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE INCLUDE A NEW GROUNDING |
| | ELECTRODE SYSTEM AT GENERATOR AS |
| | REQUIRED PER 250.50,250.20. |
| | THIS IS ONE ITEM THAT SHOULD REALLY BE |
| | DISCUSSED AND COORDINATED WITH OWNER'S, |
| | CONTRACTOR AND DESIGN TEAM ON WHICH |
| | SYSTEM IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED AS SPECS |
| | SHEETS FOR EQUIPMENT ORDERED FROM |
| | MANUFACTURE DOES NOT CORRELATE. |
| | IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS ON THIS AND THIS |
| | OFFICE CAN BE OF ASSISTANCE, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE CONDUCTORS SHOWN |
| | FROM GENERATOR TO THE ATS TEND TO LEND |
| | GENERATOR BEING A SEPARATELY DERIVED |
| | SYSTEM, YET THE ATS IS SHOWN AS 3-POLE? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY AND SHOW GROUNDING PER |
| | 250.30. |
| | IF NOT A SDS, THEN PLEASE INCLUDE THE |
| | EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR. |
| | 250.110,250.122 ETC |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | ** NEW NOTE ** |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH |
| | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY |
| | A NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | PLEASE CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
