| Date |
Text |
| 2009-01-07 12:33:18 | REVIEW IN ERROR |
| 2009-01-07 12:18:21 | REFER TO DATA IN ENG ROW |
| 2009-01-07 11:39:47 | NO COMMENTS |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| 2008-12-19 15:09:39 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****SECOND PERMIT PLAN REVIEW**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LISTS, NOT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713. |
| | |
| | 2.) IMPACT FEES MAY BE OWED TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED |
| | AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | APPLICATION. 233-5025. |
| | |
| | THE PLANS WERE STAMPED BUT THE RECEIPT WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 3.-4.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 5.) DECLARE AN OCCUPANT LOAD, FBC10. |
| | |
| | HOW HAVE YOU ARRIVED AT AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 16, 1000/8 |
| | X 1980? SEE FBC1004.1, MUST USE EITHER DESIGN LOAD OR |
| | BASED ON FBC TABLE 1004.1.2, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. M |
| | AND B HAVE DIFFERENT OCCUPANT LOADS. SEE FBC309; IT |
| | APPEARS THAT HIS IS M OCCUPANCY, NOT B. PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE USE OF THIS BUILDING TO |
| | JUSTIFY THE B OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW, OCCUPANT LOAD SHOULD BE SF AREA / 30 PER |
| | FBC TABLE 1004.1.2. PLEASE REVISE OR EXPLAIN OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD. |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW, OCCUPANT LOAD IS NOW CALCULATED AT 300SF |
| | PER OCCUPANT FOR MERCANTILE AREA. SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | AND FBC TABLE 1004.1.2, OCCUPANT LOAD CANNOT BE LESS |
| | THAN THE TABLE, 30 SF PER PERSON. A1-B SHOWS 1512 SF |
| | STOCKROOM AREA, WHERE IS THE STOCKROOM? THE BUILDING IS |
| | ONLY 1980SF, YET YOU ARE STATING THAT 1512 IS A STORAGE |
| | AREA, ONLY 468 MERCANTILE. OCCUPANT LOAD MUST BE |
| | DETERMINED. SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 6.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7.) SEE PREVIOUS LIST. A/C STAND PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REQUIRED FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 8.) PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, |
| | FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 10-16.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 17.) PROVIDE ENERGY CALCS AND SIGN IN |
| | ALL APPLICABLE PLACES, INCLUDING THE |
| | OWNER/AGENT LINE FBC13-103.1. |
| | |
| | INCLUDE THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO CERTIFY ENERGY |
| | COMPLIANCE, FBC13-103.1.1.1 AS HE IS REPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | BUILDING SHELL. |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW, ENERGY CALCS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL. NO RESPONSE PROVIDED FOR THIS ITEM ON THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER. |
| | |
| | 18-26.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 27.) IT APPEARS THAT THE ENGINEER HAS NOT DELCARED THE |
| | CORRECT OCCUPANT LOAD AND TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED. THE |
| | TWO EXITS ARE TO BE REMOTELY LOCATED, FBC1014.2.1. THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE TO THE ENGINEER'S |
| | FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE COMMENT REGARDING OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW, ALL DOORS TO THE OUTSIDE ARE SHOWN AS |
| | EXITS. THE "EXIT" AT THE VESTIBULE IS OBSTRUCTED BY THE |
| | STORAGE ROOM DOOR, SEE FBC 1005.2. SHOW THE TWO |
| | REQUIRED EXITS AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT TO |
| | BE REMOTELY LOCATED. DOORS MARKED AS EXIT DOORS MUST |
| | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC CHAPTER 10. |
| | |
| | 28.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 29.) THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE ISO BOARD REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE WALLS (ENERGY CALCS). PLEASE CORRELATE. NOTE |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR EXISTING WALLS. ALL INFORMATION |
| | IS TO BE ON THE PLAN IF A TYPED NAME IS USED IN LIEU OF |
| | A SIGNATURE, SEE FBC13-103.1.1.1. |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW, ENERGY CALCS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. BUILDING |
| | COMPONENTS CANNOT BE CONFIRMED. |
| | |
| | 30.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | CONTRACTOR WAS CALLED IN AN ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE SOME OF |
| | THE OUTSTANDING ISSUES. |
| | |
| | |
