| Date |
Text |
| 2008-11-07 10:53:39 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ****FIRST PERMIT PLAN REVIEW (CONVERTED FROM PLAN CHECK |
| | TO PERMIT APPLICATION)**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LISTS, NOT ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, FS713. |
| | |
| | 2.) IMPACT FEES MAY BE OWED TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY. THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED |
| | AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | APPLICATION. 233-5025. |
| | |
| | **10/10, CONFIRMED WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY, IMPACT FEE |
| | ASSESSMENT REQUIRED*** |
| | |
| | 3.) DECLARE THE LEVEL OF ALTERATION, |
| | FBC EB 301. |
| | |
| | 4.) DECLARE OCCUPANCY FBC309. |
| | |
| | M AND B WAS DECLARED. PROVIDE SF AREA FOR EACH |
| | OCCUPANCY SO THAT OCCUPANT LOAD CAN BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW, APPEARS TO BE M. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY PLANS |
| | STATE B M. SEE FBC309.1. |
| | |
| | 5.) DECLARE AN OCCUPANT LOAD, FBC10. |
| | |
| | HOW HAVE YOU ARRIVED AT AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 16, 1000/8 |
| | X 1980? SEE FBC1004.1, MUST USE EITHER DESIGN LOAD OR |
| | BASED ON FBC TABLE 1004.1.2, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. M |
| | AND B HAVE DIFFERENT OCCUPANT LOADS. SEE FBC309; IT |
| | APPEARS THAT HIS IS M OCCUPANCY, NOT B. PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THE USE OF THIS BUILDING TO |
| | JUSTIFY THE B OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW, OCCUPANT LOAD SHOULD BE SF AREA / 30 PER |
| | FBC TABLE 1004.1.2. PLEASE REVISE OR EXPLAIN OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD. |
| | |
| | 6.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7.) PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | STOREFRONT AND DOORS. FLORIDA STATE OR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED |
| | FAC9B72. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW, NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. ALSO NOTE |
| | THAT A/C STAND IS SHOWN ON M SHEETS; PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REQUIRED. RESOLVE CONFLICTS/INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN |
| | PLANS AND PRODUCT APPRPOVAL, IF ANY, PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 8.) PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, |
| | FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 10-16.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 17.) PROVIDE ENERGY CALCS AND SIGN IN |
| | ALL APPLICABLE PLACES, INCLUDING THE |
| | OWNER/AGENT LINE FBC13-103.1. |
| | |
| | INCLUDE THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO CERTIFY ENERGY |
| | COMPLIANCE, FBC13-103.1.1.1 AS HE IS REPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | BUILDING SHELL. |
| | |
| | 18-19.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 20.) M2 WAS REVISED AS PER PREVIOUS |
| | LIST, BUT STILL REFERS TO HIGH VELOCITY. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS NOT IN THE |
| | HIGH VELOCITY ZONE. |
| | |
| | THE CHART IS FROM HVHZ, PLEASE USE THE APPROPRIATE |
| | CHART FROM FBC TABLE 1509.7. ALSO, THERE IS A TYPO ON |
| | LINE 3 (27). |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW, REMOVE REFERENCE TO HVHZ. |
| | |
| | 21.) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE REMOVE |
| | OLD SHEETS. |
| | |
| | BUT PLEASE PROVIDE THEM FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 4TH REVIEW, OLD SHEETS NOT SUBMITTED. A SET HAS BEEN |
| | RETAINED. |
| | |
| | 22.) N/A |
| | |
| | 23.) IT APPEARS THAT MANY COMMENTS WERE |
| | NOT ADDRESSED. TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW, |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW AND WHERE EACH ITEM WAS |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT BOTH THE OLD SHEETS AND A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING. FAILURE TO DO SO REQUIRES A |
| | COMPLETELY NEW PLAN REVIEW AND INCREASES THE |
| | POSSIBILITY OF NEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 24-25.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 26.) ALL CHANGES ARE TO BE CLOUDED. |
| | |
| | 27.) IT APPEARS THAT THE ENGINEER HAS NOT DELCARED THE |
| | CORRECT OCCUPANT LOAD AND TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED. THE |
| | TWO EXITS ARE TO BE REMOTELY LOCATED, FBC1014.2.1. THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE TO THE ENGINEER'S |
| | FAILURE TO ADDRESS THE COMMENT REGARDING OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 28.) SOMEONE HAS REVISED THE PLAN A1B. INCORPORATE |
| | CHANGES INTO THE SIGNED AND SEALED PLAN. SOMEONE WROTE |
| | "SLIDING" DOOR (RATHER THAN SWINGING). THE DOOR IS TO |
| | COMPLY WITH FBC1008.1.3.3; NOTE REQUIREMENTS ON PLAN |
| | AND REVISE ELECTRIC SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 29.) THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE ISO BOARD REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE WALLS (ENERGY CALCS). PLEASE CORRELATE. NOTE |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR EXISTING WALLS. ALL INFORMATION |
| | IS TO BE ON THE PLAN IF A TYPED NAME IS USED IN LIEU OF |
| | A SIGNATURE, SEE FBC13-103.1.1.1. |
| | |
| | 30.) SHEET 2, WHAT DO THE ARROWS REPRESENT ON THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL? |
| | |
