| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-29 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- WILL NEED RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT. RECORDED NOC WILL EXPIRE |
| | BY 6-30-06 IF WORK IS NOT STARTED BY |
| | THEN. SEC. 713.13.9(2) FL. STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 2- REVISE ORIGINAL DWGS. HAND WRITTEN |
| | REVISIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PROVIDE |
| | BATHROOM WITH DOOR THAT ALLOWS 29" MIN. |
| | CLEAR OPENING. |
| | SECTION R322 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 3- SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS AND LOCATION. |
| | NOTE: REVISE ORIGINAL DRAWING. |
| | SEC. R807 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 4- RULE 9B-72 OF DCA REQUIRES FLORIDA OR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS. INFORMATION WAS |
| | NOT SUBMITTED AND BE AWARE THAT DADE |
| | COUNTY NOA #03-0605.05 IS EXPIRED. NEED |
| | TO PROVIDE CURRENT ONE. |
| | B) ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED |
| | ON PLANS. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORT. AND NEED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ALL CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. CHECK TRUSS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE AND ALL DETAILS TO SEE WHICH |
| | CONNECTORS ARE SPECIFIED. |
| | C) ROOF SHINGLES. NOT SUBMITTED. |
| | D) SLIDING GLASS DOORS. PROVIDE DADE |
| | COUNTY NOA WITH CLEAR & LEGIBLE DWGS. |
| | ONE SUBMITTED IS NOT READABLE. |
| | E) ENTRY DOOR. ONE SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | 6'-8" HIGH DOORS. NEED FOR 8'-0" HIGH |
| | DOORS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. MAKE SURE |
| | PRINTS ARE CLEAR AND LEGIBLE. |
| | F) DOOR AT KITCHEN/CARPORT AREA. NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. MAKE SURE CORRECT SIZE IS |
| | SUBMITTED. SEE PLANS. |
| | G) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEED UPDATED |
| | NOA #05-0729.03. GO TO THE DCA WEBSITE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG TO DOWNLOAD |
| | APPROVED CURRENT NOA. SEARCH FOR FL#6585 |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND |
| | APPROVE IN WRITTING (OR USE STANDARD |
| | REVIEW STAMP) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | TO FBC 2004. NEED TO PROVIDE REVISED |
| | LIST OF PRODUCT APPROVAL ACCORDING TO |
| | THE COMMENTS ON ITEM #4 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 6- DRAWINGS WERE STAMPED FOR IMPACT FEES |
| | ON 12-07-05. PERMIT APPLICATION WAS |
| | SUBMITTED ON 2-15-06. PLANS TO BE |
| | RE-STAMPED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY TO |
| | VERIFY THAT NO ADDITIONAL FEES ARE DUE |
| | SINCE IMPACT FEES CHANGED AFTER JANUARY |
| | 13,2006. BRING BACK PAID RECEIPT AND |
| | RE-STAMPED PLANS. MAKE SURE THE RE-STAMP |
| | DRAWINGS ARE THE REVISED ONES. |
| | |
| | 7- REVISE INFORMATION IN THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS: CONTRACTOR IS MI CASA |
| | BUILDERS, NOT T & F GENERAL CONTRACTING. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE 2 SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES |
| | OF THE SOIL TEST REPORT. REPORT IS |
| | MISSING THE FIRM CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AND THE ENGINEER'S |
| | LICENSE NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER |
| | 471 FLORIDA STATUTES AND 61G15-23.002 OF |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 9- STORM SHUTTERS: A) PROVIDE FLORIDA |
| | OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR STORM |
| | SHUTTERS TO BE USED. INFORMATION |
| | SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. |
| | B) PROVIDE KEY PLAN. |
| | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE, WHICH HAS |
| | ALL INFORMATION REQ'D FOR PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 10- SHEET A-2, S-1: A) REVISE ORIGINAL |
| | DRAWING. HAND WRITTEN REVISIONS ARE NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. UPDATE ALL INFORMATION ON |
| | EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS NOTES. SEE 2004 |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE AND COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | B) GENERAL NOTES: SPECIFY CURRENT |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR WHICH BUILDING |
| | WAS DESIGNED. "AS ADOPTED BY THE COUNTY" |
| | IS NOT AN SPECIFIC CODE. |
| | C) DETAIL F1: SHOW GRADE LEVEL TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R403.1.4 |
| | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | D) FOUNDATION PLAN: SHOW DROP FROM |
| | MAIN CONCRETE SLAB TO THE CARPORT AT |
| | ENTRY DOOR AND KITCHEN DOOR. ALSO AT |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOORS. SEE PLAN. |
| | E) SPECIFY CONCRETE SLAB JOINTS OR |
| | SPECIFY SUPPORTS SPACING FOR WWM AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R506.2.4 EXCEPTION #2 |
| | OF 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | F) DELETE MECHANICAL NOTE IF IT |
| | DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. |
| | G) UPDATE REFERENCE INFORMATION FOR |
| | OPENINGS. SEE 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE AND |
| | COMMENTS ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET S-2: REVISE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS. |
| | HAND WRITTEN REVISIONS ARE NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. |
| | A) TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE: REVISE TYPO. |
| | CORRECT CONNECTOR IS TAPL16 NOT TALP16. |
| | B) CONNECTOR A5 IS A WOOD TO WOOD |
| | CONNECTOR. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO |
| | MASONRY CONNECTOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | C) SPECIFY WHERE DOES DETAIL F/A-6 |
| | APPLIES TO?. NEW HAND WRITTEN REVISION |
| | CALLS FOR THIS DETAIL AT WALL BETWEEN |
| | CARPORT AND KITCHEN AREA. THEREFORE, |
| | NEED TO REVISE ROOF FRAMING TRUSS LAYOUT |
| | TO MATCH THIS CONDITION. CURRENT ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T CALL FOR TRUSS |
| | ABOVE THIS WALL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | D) REVISE LENGTH FOR PRECAST LINTEL |
| | #2. SEE PLANS FOR CORRECT SPAN. |
| | E) NEW ADDING STRAP DETAIL 1: |
| | * INCLUDE THIS DETAIL IN THE ORIGINAL |
| | DRAWING S-2. |
| | ** CONNECTOR USP RT24T IS A WOOD TO |
| | WOOD CONNECTOR. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO |
| | MASONRY CONNECTOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | *** CONNECTOR USP RT24T DOESN'T HAVE |
| | ENOUGH HOLES TO PUT 12 NAILS ON TRUSS |
| | SIDE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | **** CONNECTOR SIMPSON MSTA 24 IS ALSO |
| | A WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTOR. NEED TO |
| | SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY CONNECTOR FOR |
| | PROPOSED INSTALLATION. REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | |
| | 12- SHEET D-1: REVISE ORIGINAL DRAWING. |
| | HAND WRITTEN REVISIONS ARE NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. |
| | A) DELETE WINDOW MULLION DETAIL IF IT |
| | DOESN'T APPLY. |
| | B) TYPICAL 1 STORY SECTION: OVERHANG |
| | IS SHOWN INCORRECTLY. MISSING THE TRUSS |
| | LEG THAT ALLOWS PLACEMENT OF ATTIC |
| | VENTS. REVISE DETAIL AS REQUIRED. |
| | C) SHOW GRADE LEVEL TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH R403.1.4 2004 RES. CODE. |
| | D) UPDATE ALL REFERENCE STANDARDS |
| | SPECIFIED IN THEGENERAL NOTES. SEE |
| | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE CHAPTER 43 FOR |
| | PROPER REFERENCE STANDARDS AND EDITION |
| | THAT ARE ADOPTED BY THE CODE. |
| | E) NEW TYP. 1 STORY SECTION: |
| | * PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION ON ORIGINAL |
| | DRAWING. |
| | ** CLARIFY ATTIC VENTILATION. IS IT 4" |
| | VENTS OR 6"X22" VENTS. IF IT'S 4", THEN |
| | IS IT CONTINUOUS OR NOT?. IF IS 6"X22" |
| | VENTS, THEN SPECIFY LOCATION. "NO LESS |
| | THAN 1:150 IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION. |
| | *** WHERE IS THE UPLIFT TABLE?. |
| | |
| | |
| | 13- PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER |
| | CORECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL |
| | DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | THIS WAS NOT DONE ON FIRST RE-SUBMITTAL. |
| | PROVIDING THIS SET REALLY EXPEDITES THE |
| | REVIEW TIME. |
| | |
| | 14- A) PROVIDE SURVEY SHOWING NEW HOUSE |
| | FOOTPRINT AND SETBACKS. THIS WILL ALSO |
| | TAKE CARE OF ZONING COMMENTS. |
| | B) PROVIDE SURVEY WITH ORIGINAL SEAL |
| | AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 |
| | OF FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
