| Date |
Text |
| 2006-10-23 15:07:07 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 2-AFTER ORIGINAL PLANS ARE REVISED BY THE ENGINEER, |
| | BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N JOG ROD) TO PAY |
| | IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK STAMPED DRAWINGS AND COPY OF |
| | PAID RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 3-MASTER BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOW 3'-0" X 6'-0" DOESN'T |
| | FIT IN THAT CORNER.WALL IS ONLY 3'-7. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 5'-0" X 6'-0" SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. ALSO, SEE WINDOW |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CORRECT WINDOW SIZES. WINDOW SIZES |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS ARE NOT FOUND IN THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SIZE CHART. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5-STORM SHUTTERS: |
| | A)ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | ENGINEER WAS ASKED TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITTING |
| | (EG: TYPICAL REVIEW STAMP) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. POMA |
| | AND WEATHERGUARD BUILDING PRODUCTS. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | AND LEGIBLE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ONLY ONE COMPANY. |
| | |
| | 6-FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL: |
| | A) ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | DON'T SIGN AND SEAL IT. |
| | |
| | B)ASSEMBLY SUBMITTED IS FOR TILE UNDERLAYMENT. |
| | ENGINEER CALLS FOR NON-INSULATED ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 24. |
| | BUT, NOA 03-0501.02 PAGE 24 IS FOR INSULATED ASSEMBLY. |
| | COORDINATE ALL INFORMATION AND RESUBMIT COMPLETE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C)ENGINEER TO USE EFFECTIVE WIND AREA OF 10S.F. |
| | FOR COMPONENT AND CLADDING WIND LOADS WHEN DETERMINING |
| | THE FASTENER SPACING FOR FLAT ROOF BASE SHEET. SEE ASCE |
| | 7-02FIGURE 6-3 NOTE #4 AND TABLE ON PAGE 45. REVISE |
| | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED OR USE NUMBERS DIRECTLY FROM |
| | THE TABLE.THEN REVISE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AND |
| | PROPOSED NAIL SPACING. |
| | |
| | D) ENGINEER TO CLARIFY IF PROPOSED NAIL SPACING FOR |
| | ZONE 3 IS THREEROWS TOTAL OR ONE ROW AT THE SIDE LAP |
| | AND THEN THREE ROWS EQUALLY SPACED IN THE FIELD OF THE |
| | SHEET. |
| | |
| | 7-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR: |
| | A)ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | B)FIXED WINDOW. |
| | |
| | C)CONCRETE LINTELS. |
| | |
| | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITTING |
| | (NOT SIGN AND SEAL)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9-DRAWING #1: |
| | A) SECTION 2/A1 AND FOUNDATION PLAN DON'T MATCH. ONE |
| | SHOWS STEM WALL FOOTING AND THE OTHER SHOWS MONOLITHIC |
| | FOOTING. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B)FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS EXISTING FINISH FLOOR SLAB |
| | INMASTER BEDROOM AT 9.14" AND MAIN HOUSE AT 16.14". |
| | CLARIFY WHY THE DIFFERENCE AND THERE ARE NO STEPS FROM |
| | ONE ROOM TO THE OTHER? REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- DRAWING #3: CLARIFY WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN |
| | BEAMS B-1 AND B-2. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | 11-PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER |
| | 13 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 12-DRAWING #7: |
| | A) R-30 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT IN 2X8 ROOF JOIST. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | B) WALL SECTION 2/A7: REVISE HUS26 CONNECTOR AT |
| | MASONRY WALL. NEED TO SPECIFY MASONRY CONNECTOR. HUS26 |
| | IS A WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTOR. SEE CURRENT CATALOGUE AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13-PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL DRAWINGS ARE CLEAR AND |
| | LEGIBLE. SOME DRAWINGS ARE TOO LIGHT AND BLURRY. |
| | |
| | 14- ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY REVIEW FEES AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B). SEE ATTACHED |
| | COPY. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
