| Date |
Text |
| 2006-07-19 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: |
| | A) ENGINEER'SPLANS ARE INCOMPLETE AND |
| | CONFUSING. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER TO SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FL. |
| | ST. 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING MULTIPLE |
| | REVIEWS OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1- WALL LEGEND AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| | FLOOR PLAN DON'T MATCH AND IS |
| | CONFUSING. UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT IS |
| | EXISTING AND WHAT'S NEW. THERE ARE MANY |
| | TYPES OF WALLS SHOWN IN FLOOR PLAN, BUT |
| | NOT IN THE WALL LEGEND. |
| | |
| | 2- PLANS SHOW WALL LEADING TO THE NEW |
| | KITCHEN AREA TO BE REMOVED. ACCORDING TO |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISAL |
| | INFORMATION THIS IS A BEARING WALL. |
| | DRAWINGS DON'T SHOW ANY SPECIFICATIONS |
| | AND CONSIDERATION FOR REMOVAL OF BEARING |
| | WALL. NEED TO SHOW SHORING AND HOW IS |
| | EXISTING AND NEW STRUCTURE GOING TO BE |
| | SUPPORTED. |
| | ENGINEER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | ADDRESSING THE STRUCTURAL |
| | STABILITY ISSUE. SECTION 106.1.2 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | ***PLANS SHOW LIKE THIS IS A NEW WALL. |
| | IS THIS A NEW WALL? |
| | |
| | 3- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | 4- AFTER ORIGINAL PLANS ARE REVISED BY |
| | THE ENGINEER, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY TO PAY IMPACT FEES. BRING BACK |
| | STAMPED DRAWINGS AND PAID RECEIPT. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | 5- AS OF JANURARY 1ST 2006 ENGINEER |
| | NEEDS TO USE NEW SEAL AS REQUIRED |
| | BY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | ***NO DONE. ENGINEER STILL USES THE SEAL |
| | READING "CERTIFICATE" NOT LICENSE. |
| | |
| | 6- A) MASTER BEDROOM SPECIFIED AWNING |
| | WINDOW DOESN'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R310 2004 |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | B) FAMILY ROOM WINDOW (MAY ALSO BE AN |
| | SLEEPING ROOM) DOESN'T COMPLY WITH |
| | SECT.R310 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS SHOWN ON |
| | ELEVATIONS DON'T COMPLY WITH EGRESS. |
| | ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE OF WINDOW. |
| | SPECIFY WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 7- A) PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR STORM SHUTTERS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY RULE 9B-72 OF DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS. |
| | ***PROVIDE CLEAR AND LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE KEY PLAN AND A COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR STORM |
| | SHUTTERS. SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE AND |
| | PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL (REQ'D BY RULE 9B-72) FOR: |
| | A) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM (CLEARLY INDICATE |
| | WHICH OF THE APPROVED SYSTEMS IS GOING |
| | TO BE INSTALLED. CHECK IF LIMITATION #7 |
| | OR #9 APPLIES AND PROVIDE REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION). |
| | ***NO DONE. COMPLETE NOA SUBMITTED |
| | WITHOUT IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY. AND, LIMITATION #7 CALLS FOR CALCULATIONS PER |
| | RAS 117. CALCULATIONS |
| | WERE NOT PROVIDED. BESIDES ENGINEER IS |
| | CONFUSING RAS CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF |
| | COVERING VS ROOF SHEATHING. |
| | ***NOTE: LIMITATION #9 CAN'T BE USED IN |
| | THIS AREA. DON'T COMPLY WITH DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR CORNER & PERIMETER AREAS. |
| | |
| | ***DADE COUNTY NOA #01-0129.15 EXPIRED |
| | 05/03/2006. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT NOA. |
| | |
| | B) ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS. |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEE PLANS & DETAILS. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | C) TYPE OF WINDOWS TO BE INSTALLED. |
| | ***ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL THIS |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. ONLY REVIEW & APPROVE |
| | IT. RE-SUBMIT NEW ONES |
| | |
| | D) EXTERIOR DOOR. |
| | ***ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL IT. |
| | |
| | E) CONCRETE LINTELS. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND |
| | APPROVE IN WRITTING (TYPICALLY DONE BY |
| | USING THE STANDARD REVIEW STAMP) ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO |
| | THIS OFFICE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 |
| | OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***ENGINEER IS NOT ALLOWED TO SIGN AND |
| | SEAL THESE PRODUCT APPROVALS BECAUSE HE |
| | IS NOT THE DESIGNER. THE REQUEST WAS TO |
| | REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM, NOT SIGN AND |
| | SEAL THEM. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER TO SPECIFY CONCRETE |
| | LINTELS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | 11- PROVIDE STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL FOR |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE SECTION R613.6.2 OF |
| | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR PROPER WAY OF |
| | INSTALLING STRUCTURAL BUCK. ALSO, CHECK |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR REQUIRED BUCK SIZE. |
| | ***NO DONE. IF USING STEEL DOOR WITH |
| | STEEL EDGE, THEN SPECIFY IT ON PLANS AND |
| | SPECIFY ATTACHMENT TO THE STRUCTURE. SEE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 12- PROVIDE DETAIL/SECTION FOR STEEL |
| | COLUMN SHOWING CONNECTIONS AT TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM OR COLUMN. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***DETAIL IS WRONG. A) 1'-0" HIGH BRAKET |
| | FOR 2X8 BEAM?. B)SIZE OF COLUMN DOESN'T |
| | MATCH COLUMN SCHEDULE. C)FOUNDATION PLAN |
| | DOESN'T SHOW CONCRETE PAD. D) 8" SPACING |
| | FOR BOTTOM PLATE ANCHORS, WHILE BOTTOM |
| | PLATE IS ONLY 7" WIDE?. E)HOW MANY #3 |
| | BARS IN FOOTING? F) TOP OF DETAIL |
| | DOESN'T MATCH ROOF FRAMING PLANS? G)IS |
| | THIS DETAIL FOR NEW COLUMN AT MASTER |
| | BEDROOM WING OR FOR NEW COLUMNS AT ENTRY |
| | PORCH? |
| | |
| | 13- SPECIFY ROOF CROSS VENTILATION AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | CODE. |
| | ***HOW IS VENTILATION ACHIEVED IF |
| | SHOWING INSULATION ON THE EAVE AND THERE |
| | IS A (2)2X8 BEAM? |
| | |
| | 14- DRAWING #1: A) REVISE CONCRETE COVER |
| | FOR FOUNDATION BEAM. SEE ACI 318-02. |
| | ***NO DONE. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND SEE |
| | ALSO STEEL NOTE AT BOTTOM OF STRUCTURAL |
| | NOTES ON SAME PAGE. |
| | |
| | ***FOUNDATION PLAN AND SITE PLAN DON'T |
| | MATCH. REVISE MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET |
| | CORNER AREA AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) SECTIONS AND DETAILS KEYED ON |
| | PLANS DON'T MATCH. COORDINATE ALL |
| | DETAILS AND SECTIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***NO DONE. KEYED DETAILS ARE CONFUSING. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS THAT |
| | APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. WHERE IS |
| | CONNECTOR SSTB16 GOING TO BE USED? AND |
| | HOW? SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS FBC. |
| | ***NO DONE. THERE IS A LOT OF INFO. THAT |
| | DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | D) WHAT'S THE CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | EXTERIOR WALL AT MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET. |
| | THERE ARE NOT SPECS FOR COLUMNS, WALLS, |
| | BEAMS, ETC. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***NO DONE. IT DOESN'T MATCH WALL LEGEND |
| | |
| | 15- DRAWING #2: A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS |
| | FOR MASTER BATHROOM WINDOW. SEC. R308.4 |
| | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | ***DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY SAFETY |
| | GLASS. DON'T CITE CODE SECTION. PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFIC INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) WIND LOAD DESIGN PARAMETERS: |
| | CLARIFY IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED AS |
| | ENCLOSED OR PARTIALLY ENCLOSED. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT IS |
| | SPELLED GCPI, NOT CCPI. SEE ASCE -02. |
| | |
| | *** IF DESIGNED AS PARTIALLY OPEN, THEN |
| | WHY PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR STORM |
| | SHUTTERS? DO OTHER OPENINGS DON'T HAVE |
| | STORM SHUTTERS?. CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) HOW IS OPENING FOR DOOR TO BE |
| | REMOVED GOING TO BE ENCLOSED. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***IT'S NOT CLEAR WHAT'S NEW WALL. IF |
| | EXISTING WALL IS BEARING OR NOT. |
| | |
| | D) INFORMATION FOR STEEL COLUMN IN |
| | COLUMN SCHEDULE DOESN'T MATCH INFO. ON |
| | COLUMN SCHEDULE ON DRAWING #1. |
| | |
| | 16- DRAWING #3: A) PROVIDE ONLY THE |
| | DETAILS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. |
| | ***ROOF COVERING INFORMATION IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED IN THIS DRAWING. ENGINEER IS |
| | CONFUSING ROOF COVERING WITH ROOF |
| | SHEATHING. PRODUCT APPROVAL LIMITATION |
| | #7 FOR FLAT ROOF SYSTEM REQUIRES |
| | CALCULATIONS DONE PER RAS 117. THIS IS |
| | DIFFERENT THAN CALCULATIONS DONE FOR |
| | ROOF SHEATHING. ENGINEER TO READ GENERAL LIMITATION #7 |
| | ON LAST PAGE OF NOA AND |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | B) SHOW IN PLANS LOCATION OF BEAMS |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE BEAM SCHEDULE. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***WHICH ONE IS B1 AND WHICH IS B2? |
| | |
| | C) SHOW ROOF SLOPE AND ORIENTATION. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC. |
| | ***NO DONE. FLAT ROOFS SLOPE IS NOT |
| | SPECIFIED ON ROOF PLAN. |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION AT |
| | MASTER BEDROOM CLOSET ROOF AREA TO SHOW: |
| | 1) HOW IS (2)2X WOOD LEDGER SHOWN ON |
| | ROOF PLAN ATTACHED TO WALL. SPECIFY ALL |
| | SIZES AND FASTENERS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***DETAIL IS INCOMPLETE AND IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | E) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM DETAIL: SEE |
| | FLORIDA OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | SELECTED FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. SEE IF |
| | SELECTED SYSTEM IS LIMITED BY GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7 OR #9. THEN, PROVIDE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION. DETAIL IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED. ONLY INFORMATION REQUIRED ON |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL ITSELF. |
| | ***ENGINEER IS CONFUSING ROOF SHEATHING |
| | WITH RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF |
| | COVERING AT CORNER AND PERIMETER AREAS. |
| | SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE |
| | OF THE NOA AND SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | F) WHERE IS THE STEEL COLUMN DETAIL |
| | TAKEN AT?. INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN. |
| | |
| | 17- DRAWING #6: A) PROVIDE DETAIL/ |
| | SECTION SHOWING HOW ARE NEW COLUMNS |
| | ATTACHED TO EXISTING ENTRY ROOF. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***NO DONE. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOW SECTION 5/A6: SEE SECTION |
| | R613.6.2 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR |
| | PROPER BUCK ATTACHMENT AND REVISE |
| | DETAIL AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***DETAIL WAS DELETED. PROVIDE DETAIL |
| | AND SEE COMMENTS ABOVE. |
| | |
| | C) WINDOWS ARE NOT DRAWN CORRECTLY. |
| | SHOW SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 18- DRAWING #7: |
| | A) WALL SECTION AA: 1) SHOW HOW IS |
| | CROSS VENTILATION ACHIEVED. SEC.R806 |
| | 2004 RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | ***SHOWING INSULATION ON THE EAVE? THIS |
| | IS BLOCKING THE VENTILATION. ALSO, THERE |
| | IS A (2)2X8 BEAM BLOCKING THE |
| | VENTILATION. |
| | |
| | B) CONCRETE TIE BEAM SHOWS ONLY 2 #5 |
| | BARS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ***TIE BEAM SIZE DOESN'T MATCH SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY FASTENING TYPE AND SPACING |
| | OF 3/4 PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***ENGINEER IS MIXING AND MATCHING ROOF |
| | SHEATHING WITH RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | FLAT ROOF BASE SHEET. REVISE AS REQ'D. |
| | |
| | D) WHERE IS SECTION AA TAKEN AT?. |
| | SHOW IT IN FLOOR/FOUNDATION PLAN TO |
| | VERIFY CONSISTENCY WITH PROPOSED |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | ***KEYED WRONG ON FLOOR PLANS. |
| | |
| | E) PROVIDE ONLY THE DETAILS AND NOTES |
| | THAT APPLY TO THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | F) WALL SECTION AA: CLARIFY WHY IS |
| | THERE A NOTE SPECIFYING "MONOLITHIC |
| | CONCRETE SLAB AND FOOTING" IF THE |
| | DRAWING IS SHOWING A STEM WALL AND |
| | CONCRETE SLAB IS SEPARATED FROM THE |
| | FOOTING?. |
| | |
| | G) WALL SECTION 2/A8 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | H) **INTERIOR WALL FRAMING DETAILS |
| | CALL FOR 2X4 WALLS. FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR |
| | 6" PARTITIONS. REVISE/CLARIFY AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | **SHOW IN FLOOR PLAN WALLS THAT |
| | WILL HAVE THE R-19 INSULATION SHOWN ON |
| | DETAILS. **NOTE: R-19 DOESN'T WORK ON |
| | 2X4 WALL. SEE MANUFACTURER SPECS. |
| | |
| | 19- PLEASE RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER |
| | CORRECTIONS ARE DONE TO THE ORIGINAL |
| | DRAWINGS TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 20- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 13 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 21- SURVEY SUBMITTED SHOWS EXISTING |
| | PORCH WHERE PROPOSED FAMILY ROOM AND |
| | KITCHEN AREA ARE GOING TO BE. ENGINEER |
| | DRAWING #1 CALLS FOR NEW CONCRETE SLAB |
| | ON COMPACTED FILL. CLARIFY IF REMOVING |
| | EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB AND PROVIDING NEW |
| | COMPACTED FILL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 22- ALL DRAWINGS TO BE CLEAR AND |
| | LEGIBLE. SOME INFORMATION IS TO LIGHT |
| | AND BLURRY AND HARD TO READ. REVISE. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
