| Date |
Text |
| 2006-01-12 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1-REPLACING STEEL DECKING IS |
| | CONSIDERED STRUCTURAL WORK. ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTOR IS NOT ALLOWED TO PERFORM |
| | STRUCTURAL WORK. NEED CONTRACTOR THAT |
| | CAN PERFORM THIS STRUCTURAL WORK PRIOR |
| | TO INSTALL ROOFING MATERIAL. SEE DBPR |
| | FOR SCOPE OF WORK ALLOWED FOR ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTORS. |
| | |
| | 2- FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL #FL 5186.2 |
| | IS FOR STEEL DECK. ACCORDING TO |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED THE DECK TYPE IS |
| | LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE. THEREFORE, |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AND ACTUAL INSTALLATION |
| | DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- A) FORENSIC ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE INCOMPLETE. THEY DON'T SPECIFY |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND SYSTEM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. WHAT REFERENCE IS THE |
| | ENGINEER USING TO INCREASE THE UPLIFT |
| | CAPACITY OF THE SYSTEM IF INFORMATION OF |
| | SYSTEM TO BE UPGRADED IS NOT KNOWN. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER TO VERIFY THAT PROPOSED |
| | ASSEMBLY IS THE SAME ASSEMBLY THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS DESIGNED FOR. EG: |
| | THE DECK IS LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE NOT |
| | STEEL. AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS BASED ON |
| | THAT CRITERIA. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) ENGINEER TO SPECIFY HOW LONG ARE THE |
| | FASTENERS. REMEMBER LIGHT WEIGHT |
| | CONCRETE DECK.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
