| Date |
Text |
| 2006-12-05 09:26:04 | **** UNSAT **** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER THE NEW |
| | DESIGN FOR THE ELECTRICAL AND DESIGN CHANGES OF |
| | BUILDING WHICH CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEWED PLANS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE MEETING HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THIS REVIEW DID NOT CONSTITUTE AS A |
| | TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL REVIEW OF SAID PLANS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW SOME ITEMS FROM MEETING ALONG WITH THIS |
| | FULL REVIEW ARE BEING NOTED BELOW. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT SHEETS |
| | WHICH CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL PLANS AND RISER FOR |
| | THE AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS INDICATE AN ASCO/ONAN/CUMMINS TYPE |
| | SWITCH HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE SPECS SUBMITTED ARE FROM |
| | A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MANUFACTURE. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE PLANS INDICATE THAT FACT THAT THE |
| | ATS SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY BREAKER WHICH IS OK AND IS |
| | NOT REQUIRED, HOWEVER BASED ON THE SPEC SUBMITTED THE |
| | PROPOSED ATS DOES CONTAIN A BREAKER. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE AND PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW AS THEY |
| | ARE ALSO IN RESPECT TO WHAT THE PLANS INDICATE FOR THE |
| | ATS. |
| | 110.3, 90.7 |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT AS THE PLANS WERE FIRST |
| | OVER-VIEWED, A CALLED WAS PLACED TO KAMM CONSULTING TO |
| | HAVE THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS E-MAILED OR |
| | FAXED AS IT WAS THE HOPE THAT THIS MAY HAVE BEEN THE |
| | ONLY COMMENT. PLEASE KNOW AS OF THIS REVIEW AND BASED |
| | ON THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SUBMITTING THE CORRECTED |
| | SPECS UNFORTUNATELY WILL NOT HELP IN THE PROCESSING OF |
| | THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE THE PLANS, RISER AND SPEC FOR |
| | THE ATS. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS INDICATE THE ATS AS 1200A |
| | ON 4.1 AND 800A ON 5.1. |
| | PLEASE ALSO VERIFY THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION TO THIS |
| | ATS AS THE MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL (MDP) SHOWS A 1000A |
| | BREAKER FEEDING THIS ATS WHICH IS RATED AT 800A'S OR |
| | WILL IT BE HIGHER? |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | 90.7, FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL "MDP" INDICATES A 1000A |
| | BREAKER FEEDING THE ATS AS NOTED ABOVE, HOWEVER THE |
| | "GMDP" IS ONLY RATED AT 800A'S.? |
| | PLEASE ALSO CORRELATE AS THE PLANS ON 4.1 INDICATE THE |
| | "GMDP" AS 1200A'S? |
| | PLEASE KNOW IF THIS BREAKER AND FEED TO THE GMDP IS |
| | ACTUALLY GOING TO BE SIZED AT 1000A'S AT 277/480V, |
| | PLEASE SEE 240.13, 230.95, 700.7D, 700.26 AND NFPA-110, |
| | 6.2.15* ISOLATION OF NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS. PROVISIONS |
| | SHALL BE INCLUDED FOR ENSURING CONTINUITY, TRANSFER, |
| | AND ISOLATION OF THE PRIMARY AND THE EPS NEUTRAL |
| | CONDUCTORS WHEREVER THEY ARE SEPARATELY GROUNDED TO |
| | ACHIEVE GROUND-FAULT SENSING. |
| | THIS WAS TALKED ABOUT IN THE MEETING BEFORE PLANS WERE |
| | RESUBMITTED AND THE CONSENSUS AND UNDERSTANDING WAS |
| | THAT THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON THE NORMAL LINE |
| | SIDE OF THE GMDP WHICH IS THE FEED FROM THE MDP WOULD |
| | BE CHANGED TO 800A?S WHICH WOULD IN TURN NOT REQUIRED |
| | THE ISOLATION OF THE NEUTRAL FOR A SEPARATELY DERIVED |
| | SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE SEE 240.12, 110.10 AND NFPA-110 6.5.1 AS THE |
| | SELECTIVE COORDINATION SHALL STILL BE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | MET. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE ALL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS THE EQUIPMENT WHICH IS REMOTELY LOCATED |
| | IS NOT BEING FED FROM ONE PANEL AT THAT LOCATION AS THE |
| | OTHER EQUIPMENT SHOWN IS, SIGNAGE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | EACH DISCONNECTING MEANS AT EACH LOCATIONS DENOTING |
| | WHERE FEED TO EACH IS PROVIDED. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FAULT CURRENT CALCULATIONS |
| | INDICATE SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS FIGURED INTO THE |
| | CALCULATIONS WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE SEC'S WHICH |
| | ARE SHOWN ON THE FEEDER SCHEDULE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 110.9, 240.4 AND FBC 106.1.2 AND CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS AT THE MAIN MECHANICAL ROOM |
| | AND THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE SITE ARE SHOWING |
| | ALL CIRCUITING AS "GDP"? THIS IS BEING ASSUMED THIS IS |
| | FROM THE OLD GARAGE DISTRIBUTION PANEL DESIGNATIONS? |
| | PLEASE SEE AS THE DESIGNATION ON THE GMDP IS NOTING |
| | THESE, THERE SHOULD BE NOT DIFFERENTIATION ON THE |
| | DESIGNATION ON WHICH PANEL THESE SHOULD BE FED FROM. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE. PLEASE SEE SHEETS E1.3 AND E4.1. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE MDP ON PLANS WITH RISER AND |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE. PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THE MDP |
| | SWITCH GEAR INDICATES THIS AS 2000A'S WITH A 2000A MCB |
| | GF PROTECTED BREAKER, YET PLEASE SEE E4.1 WHICH |
| | INDICATE THIS AS A 3000A MAIN. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE KEYNOTE #7 ON THE LOWER RIGHT HAND |
| | SIDE OF E5.1 WHICH INDICATES EACH OF ELEVATORS |
| | DISCONNECTS RATED AT 125A'S YET THE MDP AND THE GMDP |
| | INDICATE 200A OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FEEDING THESE. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THIS? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE OCP IS BASED ON THE OCP AT THE ELEVATOR |
| | DISCONNECT. PLEASE SEE THE CONNECTED LOAD BEING SHOWN |
| | AT 119A'S. PLEASE VERIFY THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AS |
| | THE 125A DISCONNECT DOES NOT SEEMED TO BE SIZED PER THE |
| | OCP FROM THE MDP AND GMDP. PLEASE SEE 620.61B1, 430, |
| | 430.33, 430.52, 430.22E ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW AS THE HP RATING FOR EACH MOTOR IS NOT |
| | INDICATED AND THE TYPE OF MOTOR IS NOT KNOWN |
| | VERIFICATION OF THESE MOTORS CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS |
| | TIME. |
| | PLEASE SEE E3.1 OR 4.1 DO NOT SHOW THE DISCONNECTING |
| | MEANS ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE KEY NOTE #8 WHICH INDICATE THE |
| | DESIGNATION OF THE BREAKER AT THE GENERATOR AS G-2, YE |
| | THE RISER INDICATES A G1A1-1. IS THIS THE SAME? PLEASE |
| | SEE THIS OVER CURRENT PROTECTION IS BEING SHOWN AS |
| | 600A'S WHICH IS OK; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH |
| | RESPECT TO THE CORRELATION OF THE EPSS (EMERGENCY POWER |
| | SUPPLY SYSTEM). |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS |
| | SUBMITTED INDICATE THE VOLTAGE, AND WHERE THE OVER |
| | CURRENT PROTECTION AT THE GENERATOR WILL BE. ( VOLTAGE |
| | IS SHOWN ON RISER NOTES) |
| | 110.3, 90.7, |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE FEEDERS FROM MDP TO THE ATS |
| | AND FROM THE ATS TO THE GMDP. PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE |
| | WITH RESPECT TO THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AT THE MDP |
| | AND WHAT THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION WILL BE. PLEASE SEE |
| | THAT BASED ON THE WHETHER OR NOT THE SYSTEM IS 1200A'S, |
| | 1000A'S, 800A'S OR 600'S, THIS WILL MOST LIKELY HAVE AN |
| | AFFECT ON THE FEEDERS, NUMBER OF FEEDERS AND THE SIZES |
| | AS SHOWN. PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE VOLTAGE DROP FORM |
| | THE GENERATOR LOCATION THE FEEDERS BEING INCREASED ARE |
| | NOT IN QUESTION. (13-413.1.ABC.1.1) |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE AND VERIFY THE |
| | SIZES AS SHOWN. |
| | 240.4, 310.16 ETC. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE COORDINATION OF THE |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS SUBMITTED FOR THE GENERATOR FUEL TAN |
| | AND WEATHER PROOF ENCLOSURE. SPECS INDICATE AS THESE |
| | ARE BOTH PROVIDED AND LISTED BY ONAN, YET THE RISER |
| | NOTES MENTIONS A "PHOENIX" PRODUCTS FOR EACH OF THE |
| | TWO? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 110.3, AND PLEASE SEE COMMENTS PERHAPS FROM MECHANICAL |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | FBC 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE AND INDICATE ALL FIXTURE |
| | DESIGNATIONS ON SITE PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE |
| | SUBMITTED FIXTURE LEGEND. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME |
| | FIXTURES WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN ANY DESIGNATIONS AND |
| | COULD NOT LOCATED THEIR SYMBOL ON THE LEGEND? |
| | PLEASE ALSO CORRELATE ALL CIRCUITING SHOWN ON SITE OR |
| | EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLANS WITH THE LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL |
| | DESIGNATED AS "LC-2". PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME |
| | CIRCUITS ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE DETAIL ON |
| | E0.1. PLEASE SEE SITE PLANS ETC CONTAINS NOTES TO SEE |
| | THE DETAIL ON E0.1, YET THESE ARE NOT SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FOUNTAIN PUMP ON SITE PLANS WHICH |
| | IS SHOWN BEING CONNECTED TO H1, 14, 16, 18, YET THE |
| | PANEL SCHEDULE H1 SHOWS THESE CIRCUITS AS SPARE/BLANK. |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE AND CORRELATE. |
| | 240.4, 310.16, 408.4 |
| | |
| | ** ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| 2006-12-05 06:47:27 | REVIEW IN PROGRESS 06:45 12/5 |
| 2006-12-04 20:05:35 | NOTES TO FOLLOW, REVIEW STOPPED AT 8PM ON 12/4 TO |
| | CONTINUE ON 12/5 |
| 2006-12-03 20:49:35 | ONE SET IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. |
