| Date |
Text |
| 2006-04-18 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED |
| | |
| | 2-5.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6.)WHERE IS THE EXTERIOR WALL AT THE |
| | ENTRY?IS THIS LOCATION CHANGING?ARE |
| | THE FRENCH ENTRY DOORS SHOWN NEW OR |
| | EXISTING?IF THEY ARE NEW, PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS.NOTE THAT IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FBC EB 507.3, |
| | FBC16091.4.USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS |
| | FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST BE |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF THIS IS YOUR |
| | INTENT.RESUBMITTING WITH PLANS SHOWING |
| | USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTES WITHOUT AN |
| | APPROVED INSTALLATION PLAN WILL RESULT |
| | IN A DELAY OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.IT IS NOW DETERMINED |
| | THAT AN EXTERIOR WALL IS BEING RELOCATED |
| | AND THAT NEW DOORS ARE BEING INSTALLED. |
| | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED.PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.AGAIN, FAILURE |
| | TO PROPERLY ADDRESS THIS COMMENT WILL |
| | RESULT IN A DELAY OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 7-8.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.)IF THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SPRINKLED BY CODE, SUPPLY FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | NOT ADDRESSED.HAVING A SUBCONTRACTOR |
| | SUBMIT SHOPS AT A FUTURE DATE IS NOT |
| | SHOWING CODE COMPLIANCE ON THIS PLAN. |
| | PROVIDE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5) AND |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 10.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE.IF |
| | EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN |
| | THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE WIND DESIGN |
| | INFORMATION FBC1603.1.4. |
| | |
| | THE ARCHITECT REFERS TO THE STRUCTURALS, |
| | THE ENGINEER HAS STATED THAT NO EXTERIOR |
| | WORK IS TO BE DONE.YOU ARE RELOCATING |
| | AN EXTERIOR WALL AND INSTALLING EXTERIOR |
| | DOORS.THIS IS EXTERIOR WORK.PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION REQUESTED, INCLUDING DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR THE NEW DOORS. |
| | |
| | 11-13.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14.)THE RAMP IS TO COMPLY WITH |
| | FBC11-4.8.NO DETAIL OR SLOPE WAS |
| | PROVIDED.IF HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED, |
| | THEY ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.8.5. |
| | PROVIDE SLOPE AND ELEVATION CHANGE.THE |
| | RAMP APPEARS TO LEAD TO THE REAR AREA, |
| | WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THE HEAVY DASHED |
| | LINE IS NOT A WALL.PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | LEGEND FOR CLARIFICATION. |
| | |
| | YOU HAVE CHANGED THE LINE FROM A DASHED |
| | TO A SOLID, AND A LETTER STATING THAT |
| | HIS DELINEATES THE WORK AREA.PROVIDE A |
| | LEGEND ON THE PLAN AS REQUESTED AS A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER IS TO ASSIST IN PLAN |
| | REVIEW, NOT TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, AND |
| | THE LETTER IS NOT A PART OF THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AS REQUESTED.THE |
| | ARCHITECT HAS RESPONDED THAT HANDRAILS |
| | ARE NOT NECESSARY.ACCESSIBILITY |
| | REQUIRED TO ALL AREAS.PROVIDE THE |
| | INFORMATION REQUESTED.THE PLANS ARE TO |
| | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 15.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 16.)HOW IS THE STAGE ACCESSIBLE?IT |
| | IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DARK LINE IS A WALL |
| | OR IF IT IS DELINEATING THE LINE BETWEEN |
| | THE AREA OF WORK AND AREA NOT INCLUDED |
| | IN THE REMODEL. |
| | |
| | VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED, EITHER |
| | IN THE FORM OF A PERMANENT RAMP OR A |
| | LIFT, FBC11-4.1(1), 11-4.1.2(2), |
| | 11-4.1.6(1)(B). |
| | |
| | 17.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-5.NO |
| | DETAILS IN REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY WERE |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | SEE ITEM 16.THE RAMP PREVIOUSLY SHOWN |
| | ON THE PLAN IS NO LONGER ON THE PLAN. |
| | THE RAMP IMPLIES A CHANGE OF ELEVATION. |
| | OLD SHEETS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS |
| | RESUB.SHOW ELEVATION CHANGES ON THE |
| | PLAN, INCLUDING IN THE AREA HATCHED AS |
| | AN AREA NOT PART OF THE REMODEL.THERE |
| | STILL MUST BE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM |
| | THE NEW AREA TO THE EXISTING AREA. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 18.)TWO COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED.ONLY ONE SET OF ENGINEERING |
| | WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 19.)WAS A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT |
| | DONE TO DETERMINE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY? |
| | IF IT WAS, PROVIDE TWO SIGNED, SEALED |
| | ORIGINALS.IF NOT, THIS PERMIT WILL BE |
| | ISSUED WITH A PROVISO THAT A SOILS |
| | INVESTIGATION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | BEFORE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 20.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X |
| | PLAN REVIEW WILL BE CHARGED IF THE |
| | COMMENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED IN |
| | THE THIRD REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
