| Date |
Text |
| 2008-04-22 08:20:55 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | ***REVISION, VARIOUS SHEETS*** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1.A ROOF HATCH IS SHOWN ON S07; PLEASE PROVIDE STATE |
| | OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FAC9B72.THIS MAY BE A |
| | PROVISO ITEM; HOWEVER, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS |
| | ISSUE HAS DELAYED (AND ALMOST PREVENTED) C.O. ON OTHER |
| | JOBS.TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NO MANUFACTURER HAS YET |
| | OBTAINED STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR A ROOF HATCH, AND |
| | ONLY ONE HAS OBTAINED A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL.THERE |
| | HAS BEEN A DECLARATORY STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE STATE |
| | CONFIRMING THAT ROOF HATCH FALLS UNDER FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 2.SECTION 4 S05, DETAIL INDICATOR 4 S14 IS NO LONGER |
| | INCORPORATED IN THE DETAIL.IS THERE A NEW DETAIL FOR |
| | THIS, OR IS IT UNNECESSARY? |
| | |
| | 3.SHEET S20 DOES NOT MATCH THE S20 WE HAVE ON FILE. |
| | THE SHEET S20 SUBMITTED IS TITLED SCRUBBER, COOLING |
| | TOWER & PELLET OIL TANK FOUNDATION PLANS & SECTIONS, |
| | BUT THE INDEX DOES NOT SHOW A SHEET WITH THIS TITLE IN |
| | THE ISSUED SET OF PLANS.IT APPEARS TO BE A NEW SHEET, |
| | AND SHOULD HAVE A UNIQUE SHEET NUMBER.THE SHEET ON |
| | FILE IS TITLED COOLING TOWER PAD & CHEMICAL STORAGE. |
| | DOES THE NEW SHEET REPLACE THIS ONE OR SHOULD IT BE |
| | ADDED? |
| | |
| | 4. S20, COOLING TOWER FOUNDATION PLAN, SHOWS A CLOUD |
| | WITH A NOTE THAT STATES HOLD.PLEASE PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 5. SEE SHEET A001A LIFE SAFETY PLAN OVERALL AND THE |
| | REVISED A001B.THE TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM STAIR 5 IS TO |
| | BE MEASURED ALONG THE NATURAL PATH OF TRAVEL.AS |
| | DRAWN, THE PATH APPEARS TO GO THROUGH EQUIPMENT. |
| | PLEASE REVISE. FBC1015.1. |
| | |
| | 6.CLARIFY COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL, SHOWN AS 4FT.SEE |
| | DEFINITION, FBC1002. |
| | |
| | 7.SEE PREVIOUS LIST; THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION |
| | FOR THE ARCHITECTURE FIRM AND NAME OF INDIVIDUAL |
| | SIGNING THE DOCUMENT IS TO BE PRINTED ON EACH SHEET, |
| | FAC61G16-23.002, 003. |
| | |
| | 8.THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION FOR THE |
| | ENGINEERING FIRM IS TO BE PRINTED ON EACH SHEET, |
| | FAC6G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 9. A05, WALL TYPE B STATES THAT THIS IS 8IN CMU WITH |
| | 6IN 20 GAGE METAL STUDS.WALL CONSTRUCTION IS NOT |
| | CLEAR, PLEASE REVISE OR PROVIDE A DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 10. DOORS 214.2 AND 219.1 AT STAIR #1 ARE TO BE FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE RATED AS THEY ARE BOTH LOCATED IN A 2 HOUR |
| | WALL, FBC715.3. |
| | |
| | 11. I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE HARDWARE SET DESCRIPTIONS TO |
| | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FBC715.3.7.PLEASE ADVISE. |
| | |
| | 12.EXITING FROM THE SECOND FLOOR DOES NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR ONE EXIT, SEE FBC TABLE |
| | 1018.2.THE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS TO BE MEASURED FROM THE |
| | FARTHEST POINT TO THE EXIT DISCHARGE; IN THIS CASE, TO |
| | THE EXIT DOOR ON THE FIRST FLOOR.AS THE DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE TOP OF STAIR #5 TO THE EXIT DOOR EXCEEDS 124FT, |
| | THIS AREA HAS A TRAVEL DISTANCE GREATER THAN THE 75FT |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
