| Date |
Text |
| 2008-08-15 10:49:12 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | |
| | 1.PLEASE NOTE THAT, IN THE LAST REVISION, ONLY |
| | CHANGES CLOUDED WERE REVIEWED.SOME OF REVISION 15 |
| | WERE INCLUDED IN REVISION 14 BUT NOT CLOUDED. THEREFORE |
| | SOME OF THE CHANGES WHICH WERE INADVERTENTLY PASSED |
| | UNDER REVISION 14 WERE NEVER REVIEWED AND MAY HAVE |
| | COMMENTS IN THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | PLEASE HAVE THE DESIGNER REVIEW THE PLANS AND CONFIRM |
| | THAT ALL CHANGES (FROM THE ISSUED PERMIT SET) ARE |
| | CLOUDED. |
| | |
| | 2.PLEASE CLARIFY ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA AND |
| | PROPOSED; SHEET G0.0 STATES THAT ALLOWABLE BUILDING |
| | AREA IS 61,250 AND THE PROPOSED TOTAL AREA IS 74.967. |
| | TOTAL AREA PER FLOOR SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE PLAN, AND |
| | THE TOTAL PROPOSED SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE TOTAL |
| | PERMITTED.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE. |
| | |
| | 3.G0.0 CODE ANALYSIS, OCCUPANT LOAD SHOULD ROUND UP, |
| | NOT ROUND DOWN, AS THERE CANNOT BE A FRACTION OF A |
| | PERSON, AND OCCUPANT LOAD CANNOT BE LESS THAN FBC TABLE |
| | 1004. |
| | |
| | 4.TOTAL SF AREA IS NOT CLEAR.THE CODE ANALYSIS, |
| | 33545 SF PLUS 18400SF EQUALS 51945 SF, BUT THE TOTAL |
| | (BUILDING AREA BREAKDOWN) IS 74,967.PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | DISCREPANCY IN BUILDING AREA. |
| | |
| | 5. FBC1016.3(2), DEAD END CORRIDOR IS NOT TO EXCEED 50 |
| | FEET, THE CORRIDOR BETWEEN ROOMS 109 AND 113 IS SHOWN |
| | AS 65 FEET. |
| | |
| | 6. IT APPEARS THAT NEIL EDWIN DIXON IS SUCCESSOR |
| | ARCHITECT TO GERALD TODD PERRODIN.PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | LETTER WHICH STATES THAT THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN |
| | FAC61-18.002 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED. |
| | |
| | 7. THE ORIGINAL PLAN DECLARED THE BREAK ROOM AREA AS |
| | BUSINESS.REVISED A2.0B SHOWS SEVERAL ASSEMBLY AREAS, |
| | BUT ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THE CODE |
| | ANALYSIS.PLEASE REVISE EITHER A2.0B OR G0.0. |
| | |
| | 8.THE RETAIL PARTS AREA IS SHOWN AS RETAIL, DO YOU |
| | MEAN MERCANTILE?CODE ANALYSIS ON G0.0 REFERS TO B AND |
| | S1 OCCUPANCY ONLY.SEE FBC302 AND CLARIFY OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 9. THE TRANSMITTAL LETTER STATES THAT 300 SF WAS ADDED. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN A1.0 TO REFLECT THIS |
| | CHANGE, FBC*106.PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION; THE |
| | TOTAL PROPOSED AREA IS STILL SHOWN AS 74, 967, BUT THE |
| | CODE ANALYSIS SHOWS AN ADDITION 300 SF. |
| | |
| | 10. A2.2B NOTE AT K19 STATES THAT ACCESSIBLE PARKING |
| | REVISIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS.PLEASE |
| | INCORPORATE THESE CHANGES INTO THIS PLAN OR PROVIDE A |
| | PERMIT NUMBER.I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS CHANGE. |
| | |
| | 11. A7.1, THE ELEVATIONS (DETAILS 1, 2, 3, ETC.) SHOW |
| | CABINET DOORS; NOT CONSISTENT WITH DETAIL 13. |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-4.24 IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 12. THE STRUCTURAL CALCS ARE TO INCLUDE A TITLE BLOCK |
| | ON THE SIGNED AND SEALED SHEET, FAC61G15-23.002. |
| | |
| | 13.IMPACT FEES MAY BE DUE TO PALM BEACH COUNTY, |
| | 561-233-5025 DUE TO THE ADDITIONAL 300 SF BUSINESS |
| | AREA. |
| | |
