| Date |
Text |
| 2006-04-01 00:00:00 | 4/1/2006 ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | 1) ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT!!! |
| | SOME INSTANCES ARE INDICATED IN THE |
| | FOLLOWING COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2) LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MASTER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PERMIT PACKAGE INDICATING ACCEPTANCE OF |
| | THE SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, |
| | ELEVATIONS, MATERIALS, COLORS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PAVING/GRADING PLAN DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE SITE PLAN WITH RESPECT TO THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE BUILDING, THE ADDITONAL |
| | HC PARKING SPACE, ETC. |
| | |
| | 4) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE |
| | SITE PLAN WITH RESPECT TO THE LOCATION |
| | OF THE BUILDING, THE ADDITIONAL HC |
| | PARKING SPACE, THE SWIMMING POOL, THE |
| | REFLECTING POOL. |
| | |
| | 5) THE WALLS/FENCES AROUND THE TWO POOLS |
| | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND |
| | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING APPEARS TO |
| | INTERFERE WITH THEIR LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 6) THE SCREENING OF THE POOL EQUIPMENT |
| | IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS...THE LOCATION OF THE POOL |
| | EQUIPMENT IS NOT EVEN SHOWN ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7) THE LANDSCAPING AT THE NORTHEAST |
| | CORNER OF THE PROPERTY INTERFERES WITH |
| | THE EXISTING ASPHALT PATH THAT GOES |
| | AROUND THE BELLSOUTH EASEMENT...IS THE |
| | PATH BEING RELOCATED?IF SO, IS |
| | BELLSOUTH ACCEPTABLE OF THIS AND NO |
| | OTHER PLANS INDICATE IT BEING RELOCATED. |
| | |
| | 8) ON SHEET SP.02, PROVIDE THE OUTLINE |
| | OF THE BUILDING.NO DETAIL WAS PROVIDED |
| | ON THE PROPOSED ALUMINUM FENCE AND THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | PLANTING BEDS THAT ARE INDICATED HERE. |
| | |
| | 9) ON SHEET SP.03, THE LABEL NEAR THE |
| | POOL INDICATES A FOUNTAIN FEATURE, BUT |
| | NONE IS SHOWN, SCREENING OF THE POOL |
| | EQUIPMENT IS NOT SHOWN, NO DETAIL OF THE |
| | PROPOSED BIKE RACK HAS BEEN PROVIDED, |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | PLANTING BEDS THAT ARE INDICATED HERE. |
| | |
| | 10) PROVIDE MORE DETAIL REGARDING THE |
| | CANOPIES THAT ARE INDICATED ON SHEETS |
| | SP.02 AND SP.03.THESE CANOPIES ALSO |
| | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | 11) THE LOCATION OF THE KITCHEN EXHAUST |
| | FAN IS NOT CONSISTENT BETWEEN ALL |
| | ELEVATIONS NOR THE ROOF PLAN. |
| | |
| | 12) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL OF THE |
| | SCREENING OF THE KITCHEN EXHAUST FAN. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, |
| | SENIOR PLANNER AT (561) 822-1435. |
| | |
| | ----------------- |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM ALAN |
| | BARATTA, LANDSCAPE PLANNER.... |
| | |
| | 1) THE TREE PLANTING DIAGRAM NEEDS TO BE |
| | MODIFIED TO ACTUALLY SHOW A PLANTING |
| | HOLE 3 TIMES THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL, |
| | AS INDICATED IN THE VERBAGE. |
| | |
| | 2) ADD A STATEMENT THAT THE TRUNK FLARE |
| | OR TOP ROOT WILL BE VISIBLE ON THE |
| | SURFACE. |
| | |
| | 3) ADD A CONTAINER SPECIFIICATION THAT |
| | CONTAINER-GROWN TREES WILL BE CHECKED |
| | FOR CIRCLING ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTING. |
| | IF FOUND, THE MATERIAL MUST BE REJECTED |
| | OF IF THE ROOTS ARE LESS THAN 1/3 THE |
| | TRUNK DIAMETER, THEY CAN BE CUT IN AN |
| | AREA WHERE THEY ARE GROWNING RADIALLY |
| | FROM THE TRUNK. |
| | |
| | 4) ADD A COMMENT THAT ALL TREES SHALL |
| | HAVE THE BURLAP FOLDED BACK TO THE |
| | BOTTOM 1/3 OF THE ROOT BALL. |
| | |
| | 5) METAL BASKETS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM |
| | THE 1/2 FO THE ROOT BALL. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT ALAN |
| | BARATTA, LANDSCAPE PLANNER AT (561) |
| | 822-1435. |
