| Date |
Text |
| 2006-12-17 15:28:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 4/22/06: |
| | |
| | 1) WORKING DRAWING REVIEW ONLY.NO PERMIT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED UNTIL THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND FEES ARE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2) INFORMATIVE: |
| | A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED, COUNTY |
| | IMPACT FEES PAID AND A SIGNED THRESHOLD INSPECTION |
| | AGREEMENT SUBMITTED BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 3) FBC 13-103.1.2THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY |
| | ADDRESSED.IT IS NOTED THAT THE NAME AND LICENSE |
| | NUMBER OF EACH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HAS BEEN ADDED TO |
| | THE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM, BUT THE SIGNATURES AND |
| | DATES REQUIRED TO CERTIFY CODE COMPLIANCE HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | INCLUDED.BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, THE |
| | 'CERTIFICATION' BOX ON SHEET 2 OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS SHALL BE SIGNED AND DATED BY THE |
| | 'PREPARER' AND THE BUILDING OWNER, THE OWNER'S |
| | ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED |
| | BY THE OWNER. ALSO, SHEET 1 SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITH |
| | THE PERMIT NUMBER (05110247). |
| | |
| | 19) FBC 1606.1TRANSFORMER VAULT DOOR 117A.SUBMITTAL |
| | OF PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0222.06 (FL2198.3) FOR A |
| | 6070 DOUBLE DOOR IS NOTED BUT SHEETS 1 AND 2 OF 11 BOTH |
| | STATE MAXIMUM POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE DESIGN PRESSURES OF |
| | +60 PSF AND -60 PSF FOR THE PROPOSED DOOR.THE |
| | PRESSURES REQUIRED BY THE SUBMITTED RWDI WIND LOAD |
| | STUDY REPORT FOR THE SOUTH ELEVATION OF THE PHASE II |
| | BUILDING ARE +65 PSF AND -65 PSF.SUBMIT AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 21) FBC 1606.1HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOW W2, W4, W6, |
| | W6.1.THE RESPONSE IS NOTED AS STATING THAT A CUT DOWN |
| | EFCO CORP. SERIES 3014 SLIDING GLASS DOOR WILL BE USED |
| | FOR W2 AND W6 WHERE THE REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURE IS 95 |
| | PSF, AND AN EFCO CORP. SERIES 3500 HORIZONTAL SLIDING |
| | WINDOW WILL BE USED FOR W2, W4, W6, W6.1 WHERE THE |
| | REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURE IS LESS THAN 95 PSF.NO |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED FOR EFCO CORP. SERIES |
| | 3014 SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND ONLY ONE COPY OF THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL (ONE COPY ATTACHED TO THE COMMENT |
| | RESPONSE LETTER) FOR EFCO CORP. SERIES 3500 HORIZONTAL |
| | SLIDING WINDOW WERE SUBMITTED.SUBMIT THREE COPIES OF |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS INCLUDING THE FLORIDA STATEWIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET (FL####).FOR EASE OF |
| | REFERENCE A COPY OF THE FLORIDA STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL COVER SHEET FOR EFCO CORP. SERIES 3500 |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOW HAS BEEN INSERTED INTO THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER ATTACHMENT PACKET FOR YOUR |
| | USE. |
| | |
| | 22) INFORMATIVE: |
| | FBC 1606.1PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL. ALL THREE |
| | COPIES OF THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENT BINDERS INCLUDE SOME |
| | INCOMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.PLEASE REVIEW |
| | THE BINDERS TO ENSURE THAT A PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED FOR EACH TYPE OF PRODUCT THAT IS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED.PLAN REVIEW WILL ONLY ENSURE THAT THE |
| | BINDERS INCLUDE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO COVER THE WORST |
| | CASE.FOR, EXAMPLE IF ONLY A LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS SUBMITTED, THAT WOULD MEET PLAN |
| | REVIEW REQUIREMENTS BUT IT WOULD MEAN THAT PRODUCT |
| | WOULD HAVE TO BE USED EVEN WHERE LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | RATING IS NOT REQUIRED.REMOVE, FROM EACH BINDER, ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER |
| | APPLICABLE DUE TO THE SUBSTITUTIONS MADE.ALSO, WHERE |
| | MULTIPLE OPTIONS ARE COVERED BY A PRODUCT APPROVAL, THE |
| | APPROPRIATE PAGES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SHALL BE |
| | MARKED TO SHOW WHICH PRODUCT OPTIONS/SIZES ARE PROPOSED |
| | SO THAT THE APPLICABLE DESIGN PRESSURE RATING CAN BE |
| | DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 23) -PROVISO- |
| | WINDOW WALLS: THE WINDOW SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL SHALL |
| | INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL MULLION.THE MULLION MUST BE |
| | CAPABLE OF SPANNING HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE |
| | WIDTH OF THE OPENING FOR THOSE WINDOWS THAT EXCEED THE |
| | MAXIMUM HEIGHT STATED IN THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS INC. FIXED WINDOW LARGE MISSILE IMPACT SERIES |
| | 101 AND SMALL MISSILE IMPACT SERIES 101 |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA'S 03-0415.18 AND 05-0420.01. |
| | |
| | 24) -PROVISO- |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOORS:THE WINDOW/DOOR SUBCONTRACTOR |
| | SHALL PROVIDE RATIONAL ANALYSIS FROM A FLORIDA |
| | REGISTERED ENGINEER TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF THE PROPOSED |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR IN SIZES THAT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN |
| | THE SUBMITTED EFCO CORP. SERIES S-3005 SLIDING GLASS |
| | DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 02-0722.02, AND MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS INC. SERIES 100 SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA'S 04-0908.02 AND 01-1108.03. |
| | NOTE: MISSILE IMPACT RATING FOR THESE LARGER SIZES |
| | CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED BY RATIONAL ANALYSIS.MISSILE |
| | IMPACT TEST RESULTS MUST BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 25) -PROVISO- |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOWS: IT IS NOTED THAT 'CUT-DOWN' |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOORS WILL BE USED FOR THOSE HORIZONTAL |
| | SLIDER WINDOWS WHICH EXCEED 6'-6" WIDE X 6'-0" HIGH |
| | (FOR EXAMPLE W2, W2.1, W3, W3.1, W3.2(SLIDER?), W3.P, |
| | W4, W4.1, W5, W5.1, W5.P, W6, W6.1). |
| | |
| | 26) -PROVISO- |
| | FIXED WINDOWS:THE WINDOW SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTAL SHALL |
| | INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL MULLION.THE MULLION MUST BE |
| | CAPABLE OF SPANNING HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE |
| | WIDTH OF THE OPENING FOR THOSE WINDOWS THAT EXCEED THE |
| | 6'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT STATED IN THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS INC. SERIES 122 ALUMINUM FIXED WINDOW PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA 04-0322.09. |
| | |
| | 28) STOREFRONT WINDOWS.PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SUBMITTED |
| | EFCO CORP. SERIES 5600 ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 02-0304.01 (FL 1561.1) IS RATED FOR SMALL |
| | MISSILE IMPACT ONLY.IT CAN ONLY BE USED IN LOCATIONS |
| | HIGHER THAN 30 FEET ABOVE GRADE.PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | SHEET A6-61 REFERS TO THE FIRST FLOOR STOREFRONT AS SF1 |
| | AND THE ROOF (LANTERN) STOREFRONT AS SF2 WHICH IS |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS.THE |
| | EXCEPTIONS ARE SHEETS A4-06 AND A4-11 SHOULD BE REVISED |
| | AS THEY REFER TO THE ROOF LANTERN STOREFRONT AS SF1. |
| | |
| | 29) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL WHICH REQUIRES |
| | NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE |
| | OLD SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW SHEETS |
| | INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD SHEET SHOULD BE |
| | STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A |
| | SET OF 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF REVISIONS |
| | WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: |
| | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
