| Date |
Text |
| 2006-04-15 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1) WORKING DRAWING REVIEW ONLY.NO |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED UNTIL THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AND FEES ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 2) INFORMATIVE: |
| | A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE |
| | RECORDED, COUNTY IMPACT FEES PAID AND A |
| | SIGNED THRESHOLD INSPECTION AGREEMENT |
| | SUBMITTED BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 3) FBC 13-103.1.1.1ONLY THE |
| | MECHANICAL SYSTEM DESIGNER'S NAME AND |
| | LICENSE NUMBER ARE CURRENTLY INCLUDED ON |
| | SHEET 2 OF THE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | FORM.ALL OF THE PROFESSIONALS |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE |
| | BUILDING SHELL AND THE ELECTRICAL, |
| | LIGHTING, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL EACH SIGN THE ENERGY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORM, IN THE SPACE PROVIDED, |
| | TO CERTIFY COMPLIANCE. |
| | ALSO, SHEET 1 SHOULD BE COMPLETED WITH |
| | THE CORRECT PROJECT ADDRESS (350 S |
| | AUSTRALIAN AVE), ZIP CODE (33401) AND |
| | PERMIT NUMBER (05110247). |
| | |
| | 4) 471.023 F.S.STRUCTURAL PLANS.ADD |
| | THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER |
| | (EB 25930) FOR ECHELON ENGINEERING, LLC |
| | TO EACH SHEET.THE TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY |
| | SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER |
| | PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD |
| | THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET.THIS MAY BE |
| | ADDED BY HAND. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC* 104.2.1SHEET CD-02, 2ND - 5TH |
| | FLOORS, EXITING PLAN.THERE ARE TWO |
| | DOOR WIDTH NOTES BELOW THE PLAN WHICH |
| | POINT TO EXITING VIA THE BALCONY OF UNIT |
| | E2 AT THE NORTH-WEST CORNER OF THE |
| | BUILDING.THE NOTES ARE NOT APPLICABLE |
| | TO THE 2ND - 5TH CONFIGURATION.REMOVE |
| | THE NOTES. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC* 104.2.1SHEET A1-01, GROUND |
| | FLOOR PLAN.THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | ENTRANCE DOOR TO UNIT F1 IS NOT SHOWN |
| | |
| | 7) FBC* 704.1SHEETS A1-01 AND A1.01B, |
| | GROUND FLOOR PLAN.THERE IS NO LINE |
| | TYPE SHOWN ON THE PARTITION LEGEND TO |
| | SHOW THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF THE |
| | TRANSFORMER VAULT. |
| | |
| | 8) FBC* 704.1SHEET A1-01A, GROUND |
| | FLOOR PLAN.THERE IS NO LINE TYPE |
| | DIFFERENCE ON THE PLAN OR THE PARTITION |
| | LEGEND TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN 1 HOUR |
| | AND 2 HOUR RATED WALLS. |
| | |
| | 9) RECOMMENDATION:SHEETS A1-01 TO |
| | A1-17, FLOOR PLANS. FOR CLARITY AT THE |
| | FIRE RATED WALL LOCATIONS, PLEASE |
| | CONSIDER CONTINUING THE RELEVANT LINE |
| | TYPE (SEE PARTITION LEGEND) THROUGH ANY |
| | ASSOCIATED CONCRETE WALL, COLUMN, |
| | SHEARWALL ETC SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALSO, |
| | THE LINE TYPE FOR THE EXPANSION JOINT, |
| | ACROSS THE PARKING DECK, ON SHEETS A1-02 |
| | AND A1-04 SHOULD BE CHANGED FOR CLARITY. |
| | |
| | 10) FBC* 104.2.1SHEET A1-02, 2ND, 3RD, |
| | 5TH FLOOR PLAN.THERE APPEARS TO BE A |
| | SECTION OF WALL MISSING ALONG GRID A AT |
| | GRID 25. |
| | |
| | 11) FBC* 104.2.1FLOOR PLANS.THERE |
| | APPEARS TO BE NO SPOT LEVELS SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLANS.IN PARTICULAR, ADD SPOT |
| | LEVELS TO SHEETS A1-06, A1-17 AND A1-18 |
| | WHICH ARE THE 6TH FLOOR, MAIN ROOF AND |
| | UPPER ROOF PLANS, RESPECTIVELY. |
| | |
| | 12) FBC 1608.2.2SHEETS A4-10, A6-20 |
| | AND A7-20.THE GUARDRAIL SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A |
| | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED IN |
| | ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP OF THE |
| | GUARDRAIL, A CONCENTRATED HORIZONTAL |
| | LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED ON A 1 SQ FT AREA |
| | AT ANY POINT, AND A LINE LOAD OF 50 PLF |
| | APPLIED HORIZONTALLY AT THE REQUIRED |
| | GUARDRAIL HEIGHT WITH A SIMULTANEOUS |
| | LINE LOAD OF 100 PLF APPLIED VERTICALLY |
| | DOWNWARD ON THE TOP OF THE GUARDRAIL. |
| | THESE LOADS SHALL NOT BE APPLIED |
| | SIMULTANEOUSLY (UNLESS NOTED ABOVE) BUT |
| | SHALL BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO PRODUCE |
| | MAXIMUM STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS |
| | OR SUPPORTS.ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO |
| | ENSURE THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET. |
| | |
| | 13) FBC 1606.1SHEET A6-20, DETAIL 9. |
| | THE ATTACHMENT OF THE STUCCO CORNICE |
| | FRAMING SHALL BE SPECIFIED ON THE DETAIL |
| | OR A NOTE ADDED TO STATE THAT THE |
| | FRAMING AND ATTACHMENT DETAILS WILL BE |
| | SUBMITTED ON SPECIALIST SHOP DRAWINGS |
| | AFTER FIRST BEING REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD.ANNOTATE THE DETAIL |
| | |
| | 14) FBC 1015.2SHEET A6-20, DETAIL 11. |
| | THE EFFECTIVE HEIGHT OF THE GUARDRAIL IS |
| | REDUCED BY THE PRESENCE OF THE CONCRETE |
| | UPTURNED BEAM WHICH FORMS A LEDGE ON THE |
| | INSIDE FACE OF THE GUARDRAIL.TO |
| | PREVENT BUILDING OCCUPANTS FROM STANDING |
| | ON THIS LEDGE, EITHER PROVIDE A 45 |
| | DEGREE CHAMFER ON THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE |
| | CONCRETE UPSTAND OR PROVIDE SOME OTHER |
| | MEANS TO DISCOURAGE CLIMBING. |
| | |
| | 15) FBC 1608.2.1SHEET A7-20,THE |
| | HANDRAIL SHALL BE DESIGNED AND |
| | CONSTRUCTED FOR A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF |
| | 200 LB AND A LINE LOAD OF 50 PLF.THESE |
| | LOADS SHALL NOT BE APPLIED |
| | SIMULTANEOUSLY BUT SHALL BE APPLIED |
| | INDIVIDUALLY AT ANY POINT, AND IN ANY |
| | DIRECTION, TO PRODUCE MAXIMUM STRESS IN |
| | EACH OF THE COMPONENTS OR SUPPORTS. |
| | AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO ENSURE THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT IS MET. |
| | |
| | 16) FBC 1601.1SHEET L7-04, PAVILION. |
| | ADD A PAVILION FOOTING DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 17) FBC 1606.1PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | GENERALLY.MANY OF THE SUBMITTED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS INCLUDE MORE THAN ONE |
| | OPTION WITH DIFFERENT DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | RATINGS (WIND PRESSURE IN PSF).MARK |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL TO SHOW WHICH |
| | OPTION (DESIGN PRESSURE RATING) IS |
| | APPLICABLE.PLEASE DO NOT USE |
| | HIGHLIGHTER PEN BECAUSE IT DOES NOT SHOW |
| | UP WHEN THE DOCUMENTS ARE SCANNED FOR |
| | ARCHIVING AT THE END OF THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 18) FBC 1504.1ROOF COVERING. SUBMITTAL |
| | OF MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT DATA IS NOTED |
| | BUT NO OTHER DOCUMENTATION WAS INCLUDED. |
| | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL(S) FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED ROOF SYSTEM(S). |
| | |
| | 19) FBC 1606.1TRANSFORMER VAULT DOOR |
| | 117A.THE DOOR SCHEDULE, SHEET A8-10, |
| | SPECIFIES A PAIR OF 3070 HOLLOW METAL |
| | DOORS.NO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | SUBMITTED FOR A PAIR OF 3070 HOLLOW |
| | METAL DOORS.THE SUBMITTED CURRIES |
| | COMPANY COMMERCISL STEEL DOOR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS FOR A SINGLE 3070 DOOR. |
| | |
| | 20) FBC 1606.1SLIDING GLASS DOOR S1. |
| | ACCORDING TO THE SUBMITTED RWDI WIND |
| | LOAD STUDY REPORT, THERE ARE LOCATIONS |
| | ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION WHERE |
| | THIS DOOR WILL BE SUBJECT TO NEGATIVE |
| | WIND PRESSURE OF -115 PSF.DRAWING |
| | SHEET 1 OF THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS INC SERIES 100 ALUMINUM SLIDING |
| | GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 04-0908.02, STATES THAT THE MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE RATING FOR THE WINDOW IS |
| | 100 PSF.PROVIDE RATIONAL ANALYSIS TO |
| | JUSTIFY THIS OR PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 21) FBC 1606.1HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOW |
| | W2, W4, W6, W6.1.ACCORDING TO THE |
| | SUBMITTED RWDI WIND LOAD STUDY REPORT, |
| | THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHERE THESE WINDOWS |
| | WILL BE SUBJECT TO A POSITIVE AND/OR |
| | NEGATIVE WIND PRESSURE OF 95 PSF. |
| | DRAWING SHEET 1 OF THE SUBMITTED MIAMI |
| | WALL SYSTEMS INC SERIES 106 ALUMINUM |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOW PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 04-1122.02, STATES THAT |
| | THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE RATING FOR |
| | THE WINDOW IS 90 PSF.PROVIDE RATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS TO JUSTIFY THIS OR PROVIDE AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 22) INFORMATIVE: |
| | FBC 1606.1PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL. |
| | ALL THREE COPIES OF THE SUBMITTED |
| | DOCUMENT BINDERS INCLUDE SOME INCOMPLETE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL DOCUMENTS.PLEASE |
| | REVIEW THE BINDERS TO ENSURE THAT A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR |
| | EACH TYPE OF PRODUCT THAT IS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED.PLAN REVIEW WILL ONLY ENSURE |
| | THAT THE BINDERS INCLUDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS TO COVER THE WORST CASE.FOR, |
| | EXAMPLE IF ONLY A LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS SUBMITTED, THAT |
| | WOULD MEET PLAN REVIEW REQUIREMENTS BUT |
| | IT WOULD MEAN THAT PRODUCT WOULD HAVE TO |
| | BE USED EVEN WHERE LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | RATING IS NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 23) -PROVISO- |
| | WINDOW WALLS: THE WINDOW SHOP DRAWING |
| | SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLION.THE MULLION MUST BE CAPABLE OF |
| | SPANNING HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE |
| | WIDTH OF THE OPENING FOR THOSE WINDOWS |
| | THAT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT STATED IN |
| | THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SYSTEMS INC. |
| | FIXED WINDOW LARGE MISSILE IMPACT SERIES |
| | 101 AND SMALL MISSILE IMPACT SERIES 101 |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA'S 03-0415.18 AND |
| | 05-0420.01. |
| | |
| | 24) -PROVISO- |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOORS:THE WINDOW/DOOR |
| | SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS FROM A FLORIDA REGISTERED |
| | ENGINEER TO JUSTIFY THE USE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED SLIDING GLASS DOOR IN SIZES |
| | THAT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM IN THE SUBMITTED |
| | MIAMI WALL SYSTEMS INC. SERIES 100 |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA'S 04-0908.02 AND 01-1108.03. |
| | NOTE: MISSILE IMPACT RATING FOR THESE |
| | LARGER SIZES CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED BY |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS.MISSILE IMPACT TEST |
| | RESULTS MUST BE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 25) -PROVISO- |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOWS: IT IS NOTED |
| | THAT 'CUT-DOWN' SLIDING GLASS DOORS WILL |
| | BE USED FOR THOSE HORIZONTAL SLIDER |
| | WINDOWS WHICH EXCEED 6'-6" WIDE X 6'-0" |
| | HIGH (FOR EXAMPLE W2, W2.1, W3, W3.1, |
| | W3.2(SLIDER?), W3.P, W4, W4.1, W5, W5.1, |
| | W5.P, W6, W6.1). |
| | |
| | 26) -PROVISO- |
| | FIXED WINDOWS:THE WINDOW SHOP DRAWING |
| | SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLION.THE MULLION MUST BE CAPABLE OF |
| | SPANNING HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE |
| | WIDTH OF THE OPENING FOR THOSE WINDOWS |
| | THAT EXCEED THE 6'-0" MAXIMUM HEIGHT |
| | STATED IN THE SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL |
| | SYSTEMS INC. SERIES 122 ALUMINUM FIXED |
| | WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 04-0322.09. |
| | |
| | 27) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
