| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-16 08:51:14 | ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS WERE NOT RESUBMITTED...SOME |
| | WERE MADE AT THE TIME OF THE LAST REVIEW AND COULD NOT |
| | BE VERIFIED IF THEY HAD BEEN ADDRESSED.ARE THE PAVING |
| | AND DRAINAGE PLANS BEING REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 1) THE SITE PLAN AND PAVING AND DRAINAGE |
| | PLANS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH EACH OTHER. |
| | |
| | 1A) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 16 PARKING |
| | SPACES WHILE THE PANDD PLANS SHOW 15. |
| | |
| | 1B) THE LOCATION OF THE HC PARKING SPACE |
| | DIFFERS BETWEEN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 1C) THE PANDD PLANS SHOW LANDSCAPING IN |
| | THE SW CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT, THE |
| | SITE PLAN DOES NOT. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED... |
| | |
| | 2) THE PARKING DETAIL ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | DOES NOT CONFORM TO SECTION 94-485 OF |
| | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS (I.E. DOUBLE STRIPING, |
| | ETC.). NO DIMENSIONS WERE SHOWN BETWEEN THE STRIPING. |
| | SEE THE ATTACHED DETAIL FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE PROOF OF ACCEPTANCE OF |
| | THE DUMPSTER LOCATION FROM THE CITY'S |
| | SANITATION DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 8) PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF OBTAINING |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY (TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY |
| | LETTER) FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, |
| | SENIOR PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1435. |
