| Date |
Text |
| 2006-09-24 00:00:00 | ********** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ********** |
| | |
| | **PLEASE KNOW PLANS ARE BEING SUBMITTED |
| | FOR "PLAN REVIEW " FOR THE 3RD TIME. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED |
| | ANDNEW COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1)NOTE: NO, COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FBC CHAPTER 13 IS NOT YET ACHIEVED. |
| | PELASE SEE THAT ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE |
| | AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF FOR INTERIOR. NL |
| | CIRCUIT(S) ARE OK. ). |
| | PLEASE SEE OVER -RIDES SHALL LOCATED IN |
| | THE LOCATION OF INGRESS AND EGRES INTO |
| | SPACES/AREAS AND THE OCCUPANT MUST BE |
| | ABLE TO SEE ALL LIGHTING IN WHICH IS |
| | BEING OVER-RIDEN. PLEASE SEE THAT ALL |
| | OVER TIMES SHALL BE STATED ON PLANS FOR |
| | THE DEVICES BEING CHOSEN. IF A TIMER |
| | TYOE OFR OR, THEN 4HRS MAX, IF OCCUPANT |
| | SENSOR TYOE THEN 30 MINS MAX. |
| | PLEASE SEE ALSO ALL SEPARATE SPACES WITH |
| | NFLR TO CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS. |
| | PLEASE SEE MANY AREAS WHICH DO NOT |
| | CONTAIN THESE OVER RIDES. |
| | PLEASE SEE NO LIGHTING DENSITES ARE |
| | SUBMITTED OR INDICATED. PLEASE SEE FORM |
| | "A" SHOWS "MANUAL" MEANS FOR ALL |
| | SHUTOFF, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE. |
| | PLEASE SEE PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS |
| | WHICH LIMITS THE WATTAGE USEAGE. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER 13, |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | 13-415.1.AB.1 WHICH MENTIONS 415.2, THEN |
| | SEE 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1, WHICH |
| | GIVES TABLES 415.2.C.1, 415.2.B.1 |
| | ** PLEASE KNOW, AS THIS INFORMATION HAS |
| | NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED, THIS CANE NOT BE |
| | REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #2** |
| | NOTE #1 NO, PLEASE SEE THAT THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WAS ALSO FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE OF THE FBC 2004. |
| | PLEASE SEE REPSONSE MENTIONS, THE PLANS |
| | INDICATED 2002 NEC. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004, CHAPTER 13 |
| | 413.1ABC.1 FOR VOLTAGE DROP CALCS |
| | REQUIED FOR WORST CASE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-413.1.ABC.2.2 |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 , .2 AND .3 |
| | PLEASE SEE A TIME CLOCK SYSTEM IS BEING |
| | PROPOSED WITH SWITCHES LOCATED AT THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE LOCATION, HOWEVER PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THESE SWITCHES. |
| | THEY CAN OVER-RIDE NO LONGER THAN 4HRS. |
| | PLEASE SEE SEPARATE SPACES AND CONTROLS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCS SHEETS ARE |
| | "RUBBER-STAMPED" WITHE THE ENGINEERS |
| | SEAL WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER FS |
| | 471.025. PLEASE ALSO SEE THE WORDING |
| | "CERTIFICATE" IS NO LONGER PERMITTED IN |
| | SAID SEALS. PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-23.001, |
| | IN A RULING PASSED IN FEB 04, IN WHICH |
| | THE WORDING "CERTIFICATE" IN SEAL HAD TO |
| | BE CHANGED TO "LICENSE". THE EXTENSION |
| | GRANTED WAS TO DEC 31ST,2005. THESE TYOE |
| | SEALS ARE NO LONGER PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS NOTE REVIEW #1 ** |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT AS OF OCT 1ST, |
| | 2005 THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS NOW |
| | ADOPTED THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE ADJUST ALL |
| | LOCATIONS AND DESIGNS ON PLANS. |
| | THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND FOR |
| | ALL TRADES WHETHER OR NOT COMMENTS ARE |
| | MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| | PLEASE KNOW, WE ARE CURRENTLY UNDER THE |
| | 2002 NEC WHICH DOES NEED TO BE CHANGED |
| | ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2)NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS |
| | HAVE NOW HAD THE TITLE BLOCKS REVISED TO |
| | NOW INCLUDE AN ENGINEERING FIRM. PLEASE |
| | SEE THESE TITLE BLOCKS FOR ELECTRICAL |
| | SHEETS ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN THE |
| | PRINTED NAME AND PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER |
| | OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. FAC |
| | 61G15-23.002. |
| | ** THE RESPONSE LETTER WAS REVIEWED |
| | WHERE HERSCHMAN DOES NOT BELIEVE THE |
| | ARCHITECTUARAL FIRM IS REQUIRED TO |
| | CONTAIN AND CA FOR THE ENGINEERING |
| | BUSINESS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW, WHEN THE VALUE AND SCOPE |
| | RELEVANT TO PROJECT ISINCIDENTAL TO |
| | THE MAJORITY OF SCOPE AND THE ARCHITECT |
| | IS QUALIFIED TO DO SCOPE AND SIGNS AND |
| | SEAL PLANS WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE AN |
| | ENGINEER, THIS WOULD BE OK, HOWEVER THIS |
| | WAS CONFIRMED WITH THE STATE OF |
| | FLORIDA'S FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL |
| | ENGINEER'S AS THE PLANS ARE SIGNED, |
| | DATED AND SEALED BY AN ENGINEER. IF THE |
| | ENGINEER WORKS FOR HERSCHMAN AND IS |
| | PROVIDING ENGINEERING SERVICES, THEN A |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE FIRM. PLEASE OBTAIN IN |
| | WRITING FROM THE STATE BOARD AND STATE'S |
| | LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE BOARD WHERE THIS IS |
| | NOT REQUIRED ON THIS PROJECT AS THIS IS |
| | IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE DIRECTION |
| | GIVEN TO THIS OFFICE BY THE BOARD AND |
| | LEAGAL COUNSEL. |
| | WE HAVE ONTACTED THE STATE'S LEGAL |
| | COUNSEL MORE THAN ONCE FOR THIS. |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE, THE PLANS |
| | WILL BE RETAINED ANDTURNED OVER TO THE |
| | STATE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL |
| | ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW OF THIS AND CODE |
| | COMPLIANT COMMENTS AS PLANS HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED THREE TIMES WITH MANY COMMENTS |
| | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS REVIEW #2** |
| | NOTE #2 NO, PLEASE SEE THAT SAME |
| | COMMENT STANDS AS TITLE BLOCKS DO NOT |
| | CONTAIN THE REQUIRED CA # FOR NEW |
| | SHEETS. A CA# IS NOW SHOWN ONLY ON |
| | ARCHITECTURALS WHICH IS VALID FOR THE |
| | ARCH BUSINESS. PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW, |
| | FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES PROVIDED. WE |
| | HAVE CONFIRMED THIS WITH THE STATE BOARD |
| | OF ENGINEERS. ONE ROLL OF PLANS ARE |
| | BEING RETAINED AT THE REQUEST OF THE |
| | FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THIS COMMENT FOR ALL |
| | TRADES AND FOR ALL SHEETS WHETHER OR NOT |
| | THIS COMMENT IS MADE BY ANY OTHER |
| | TRADES. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS NOTE **PLEASE COMPLETE ALL |
| | TITLE BLOCK INFORMATION FOR MEP PLANS. |
| | PLEASE SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | WHICH REQUIRES, THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION # ON TITLE BLOCK ALONG |
| | WITH ALL OTHER INFORMATION AS SET FORTH |
| | IN FAC 61G15-23.002, AS REQUIRED UNDER |
| | FS 471.023. |
| | PLEASE SEE IF FIRM LISTED ON TITLE |
| | BLOCK, (HERSCHMAN) IS ALSO PRACTICING |
| | UNDER ENGINEERING, THEN A CA # FOR |
| | ENGINEERING BUS WOULD ALSO BE REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER THIS IF THERE ARE |
| | ANY QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | 3)NOTE: NOTE #3 OK. |
| | |
| | 4)NOTE: NOTE #4, OK. |
| | |
| | 5)NOTE: OK |
| | |
| | 6)NOTE: NOTE #6 OK. |
| | |
| | 7)NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THAT ALL |
| | SETS MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED. |
| | PLEASE SEE SHEETS WHICH ARE ONLY |
| | PHOTO-COPIES. WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 |
| | |
| | ** NEW NOTES** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE THESE CONTAIN A |
| | TITLE BLOCK FROM HERSCHMAN AND ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED, DATED SEALED. FS |
| | 481.221. |
| | PLEASE KNOW IF THESE DOCUMNETS WERE NTO |
| | BE HERSCHMAN, THEN PLEASE REMOVE TITLE |
| | BLOCKS AND THE PERSON/PERSONS WHO ARE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR SAID PLANS SHALL CLEARLY |
| | INDICATE ALL THEIR INFORMATIONA AND SIGN |
| | PLANS. ETC |
| | FBC 106.1, FS 481, 471, FAC 61G1-16.004, |
| | 61G15-23.002 ETC. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #2 |
| | PLEASE SEE PHOTO-METRICS WHICH |
| | WERE SUBMITTED IN INDIVIDUAL SHEETS IN |
| | PACKAGE. PLEASE BE SURE THESE SHEETS ARE |
| | SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED AND INSERTED |
| | INTO SETS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: THIS NOTE WILL STAND FOR NEW |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #2** |
| | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES FROM |
| | MORE THAN ONE TRADE WHICH REQUESTED ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE REMOVED FROM |
| | SETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW SHEETS INTO TWO |
| | COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | ONLY ONE COPY OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHOULD |
| | BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | ** NEW NOTES 3RD REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT AN ADDRESS OF |
| | 1552 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD HAS BEEN |
| | ASSIGNED TO THIS BUILDING AND PROJECT. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THAT ALL SHEETS AND ALL |
| | TITLE BLOCKS CONTAIN THE CORRECT |
| | ADDRESS. PLEASE SEE SOME PAPERWORK |
| | SUBMITTED BACK CONTAINS "1540". |
| | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT ** |
| | PLEASW KNOW, MANY COMMENTS ABOVE ARE |
| | REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND FOR ALL |
| | SHEETS WHETHER OR NOT COMMENTS ARE MADE |
| | BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM |
| | OTHER REVIEWER(S) WHICH MAY AFFECT |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| | AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR |
| | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| 2006-09-22 00:00:00 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. |
