| Date |
Text |
| 2006-06-13 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE KEEP THE NOC PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 2-7.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8.)PROVIDE CERTIFICATION IN REGARDS TO |
| | THE FLOOR LOADING, SECOND FLOOR.SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 1607.1. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - THE NEW NOTE REFERS TO "IN |
| | ACCORANCE WITH SBC TABLE".WRONG CODE; |
| | NO TABLE REFERENCED. |
| | |
| | 9. - 10)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 11.)VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED, |
| | FBC EB 806, FBC11-4.1.6(1)(B). |
| | |
| | ADDRESSED, BUT PLEASE SHOW SIGNAGE |
| | REQUIRED BY FBC11-4.10.5. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - PROVIDE SIGNAGE |
| | INFORMATION.A CODE REFERENCE WAS |
| | PROVIDED, BUT NO DETAIL OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 12-27.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, |
| | FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED.PLEASE |
| | HAVE REVIEWED BY DOR AND SUBMIT. |
| | |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED |
| | UNTIL DESIGN PRESSURE ISSUES RESOLVED. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD, NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 28-31.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 32.)SEE ATTACHED FS553(80)(2)(B).A |
| | 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE IS REQUIRED TO BE |
| | CHARGED IF COMMENTS NOT PROPERLY |
| | ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - 4X FEE CHARGED.NOTE THAT |
| | THIS FEE WILL BE CHARGED EVERY TIME IF |
| | COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 33.)THE HANDWRITTEN NUMBER FOR THE |
| | REVIEION TO THE AREA CALCS IS NOT THE |
| | SAME ON ALL SHEETS.ARE THERE OTHER |
| | DISCRPEANCIES? |
| | |
| | 34.)CHANGES HANDWRITTEN TO THE PLAN |
| | ARE TO BE INITIALLED. |
| | |
| | 35.)REMOVE OLD DATA FROM THE PLAN. |
| | THE OLD "DESIGN DATA" IS STILL ON THE |
| | PLAN WITH A CLOUD THAT STATES "DELETE". |
| | DELETE FROM THE PLAN.A NEW ONE HAS |
| | BEEN PASTED.INCORPORATE PROPERLY INTO |
| | THE SHEET.THIS IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE |
| | WAY TO CHANGE A SEALED DRAWING AS THERE |
| | IS NO WAY TO TELL WHO MADE THIS CHANGE, |
| | AFTER THE SHEET WAS SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| | |
| | 36.)BUILDING TYPE SHOULD INDICATE TYPE |
| | A OR B, FBC6. |
| | |
| | 37.)HOW HAVE YOU DETERMINED DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES?SOME ARE THE SAME AS TABLE |
| | 1609.6 FBC, BUT THIS BUILDING IS OVER |
| | 30'.LARGER OPENINGS ON THE FIRST FLOOR |
| | HAVE DPS HIGHER THAN SMALLER OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 38.)INCORRECT CODE ON ENERGY CALCS. |
