| Date |
Text |
| 2006-08-27 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 7/23/06: |
| | |
| | 6) PRODUCT APPROVALS.SUBMITTAL OF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS IS NOTED. ONLY ONE |
| | COPY OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED AT THIS STAGE.THREE COPIES |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL SHALL HAVE A |
| | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET. |
| | ALTERNATIVELY, AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED.THE |
| | FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO THE |
| | SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (A)MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM. |
| | SUBMITTAL OF THE ENHANCED FASTENER |
| | DENSITY CALCULATIONS IS NOTED.THE |
| | CONTENT IS OK BUT THE SIGNATURES ARE |
| | PHOTOCOPIED AND EACH COPY MUST HAVE THE |
| | AN ORIGINAL 'WET' SIGNATURE OF DONALD |
| | FLOOD, P.E.ALSO, PER THE 8/25/06 |
| | MEETING WITH ARTURO PENA, THREE COPIES |
| | OF THE REFERENCED JOHNS MANVILLE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 04-0401.04 WILL BE |
| | SUBMITTED.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL MUST BE |
| | MARKED OR SEPARATED TO SHOW WHICH SYSTEM |
| | IS PROPOSED (THE CALCULATIONS REFERENCE |
| | THE SYSTEM ON PAGE 30). |
| | (B)ROOF TILE:SUBMITTAL OF THE |
| | ALTUSA 'S' PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 05-0901.06 IS NOTED.ALSO, SUBMITTAL OF |
| | THE TILE ATTACHMENT CALCULATIONS IS |
| | NOTED.THE CONTENT OF THE CALCULATION |
| | PACKAGE IS OK BUT THE SIGNATURES ARE |
| | PHOTOCOPIED AND EACH COPY MUST HAVE THE |
| | ORIGINAL 'WET' SIGNATURE OF DONALD |
| | FLOOD, P.E. |
| | (C)EXTERIOR DOORS. SEE COMMENT 6(J) |
| | THRU 6(N). |
| | (D)STOREFRONT.THE SUBMITTED ARCH |
| | ALUMINUM SERIES L-300 IMPACT WALL |
| | STOREFRONT PRODUCT NOA# 01-0619.01 |
| | STATES A MAXIMUM UNIT HEIGHT OF 144". |
| | THIS IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE SIZE |
| | OF STOREFRONT SPECIFIED ON SHEETS A-4.1 |
| | AND A-4.2 OF THE PLANS.PER THE 8/25/06 |
| | MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING INC., |
| | STRUCTURAL MULLIONS WILL BE INCORPORATED |
| | AND SHEETS A-4.1 AND A-4.2 WILL BE |
| | AMENDED TO REFLECT THIS AND CALL FOR |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS 'BY OTHERS' TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. |
| | (E)SLIDING GLASS DOORS.THE |
| | SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SYSTEMS SERIES 100 |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 01-0123.02 HAS A MAXIMUM DOOR HEIGHT OF |
| | 102".DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.1 SHOWS A |
| | PROPOSED SLIDING GLASS DOOR HEIGHT OF |
| | 10'-0" WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM COVERED |
| | BY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.PER THE |
| | 8/25/06 MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING |
| | INC., THEY WILL BE APPLYING FOR A ONE |
| | TIME PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE 10'-0" |
| | DOOR AND WILL PROVIDE THREE COPIES OF |
| | THE APPLICATION FORM/LETTER SO THAT A |
| | PROVISO MAY BE GIVEN. |
| | (F)SINGLE HUNG WINDOW.THE |
| | SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SERIES 122 ALUMINUM |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 03-1008.03 HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 72". |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.2 SHOWS SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOW HEIGHTS UP TO 9'-4" WHICH |
| | EXCEED THE MAXIMUM COVERED BY THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL.PER THE 8/25/06 |
| | MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING INC., |
| | THEY WILL BE APPLYING FOR A ONE TIME |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE 9'-4" HIGH |
| | WINDOW AND WILL PROVIDE THREE COPIES OF |
| | THE APPLICATION FORM/LETTER SO THAT A |
| | PROVISO MAY BE GIVEN. |
| | (G) FIXED WINDOW.IT IS NOTED THAT |
| | FIXED WINDOW COVERED BY THE SUBMITTED |
| | MIAMI WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 04-0322.09 WILL BE USED UNDER THE SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOWS TO FORM THE 'SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOW OVER FIXED WINDOW' CONFIGURATION. |
| | AN APPROPRIATE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED OR SHEET A-4.2 SHALL |
| | BE AMENDED TO SHOW THAT A STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLION IS TO BE INCORPORATED AND THAT |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS WILL BE SUBMITTED 'BY |
| | OTHERS' FOR REVIEW. |
| | (H)MULLIONS. SEE COMMENTS (D) & (G). |
| | (I)IF THERE IS A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL THAT COVERS ANY OF THE |
| | SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA'S, THE |
| | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET |
| | MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FRONT OF THE |
| | NOA. |
| | (J)STOREFRONT DOOR.PER THE 8/25/06 |
| | MEETING WITH GLASS ENGINEERING INC. THE |
| | 9'-0" STOREFRONT DOOR IS NOT AVAILABLE |
| | SO SHEET A-4.1 MUST BE AMENDED TO REDUCE |
| | THE HEIGHT OF THE STOREFRONT DOORS. |
| | (K)LOUVER DOOR.BOTH THE COVER |
| | SHEET AND PAGE 41 OF THE SUBMITTED |
| | INTERTEK TESTING SERVICES REPORT# |
| | 3080611 STATE THAT THE MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE FOR THE LOUVER DOOR IS +60 PSF |
| | AND -60 PSF.THE MINIMUM REQUIRED |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIRED FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT IS +70 PSF AND - 70 PSF.SUBMIT |
| | AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (L)SINGLE HOLLOW METAL DOOR.THE |
| | SUBMITTED CURRIES PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 01.1102.02 IS FOR A 7'-0" HIGH DOOR. |
| | SHEET A-4.1 SHOWS DOOR TYPE 10 AS AN |
| | 8'-0" HIGH DOOR.SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (M)DOUBLE HOLLOW METAL DOOR.THE |
| | SUBMITTED CURRIES PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 02-0924.04 IS OK BUT TWO OF THE |
| | AVAILABLE OPTIONS HAVE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | WHICH ARE LESS THAN THE MINIMUM +70 PSF |
| | AND - 70 PSF REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| | THOSE TWO OPTIONS MUST BE STRUCK FROM |
| | ALL THREE COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | THAT ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING. |
| | (N)ROLL UP DOOR.THE SUBMITTED |
| | CORNELL IRON WORKS INC. PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NOA# 03-0925.07 IS HARDLY LEGIBLE (POOR |
| | COPY) BUT APPEARS TO STATE A MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE OF +60 PSF AND -60 PSF. |
| | THE MINIMUM REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT IS +70 PSF AND |
| | - 70 PSF.SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 16) FBC 411.2.3VEHICLE IMPACT |
| | WALLS/GUARDRAILS. CONTRARY TO THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE DATED 7/28/06, WALL |
| | TYPE W-30, SHOWN AT THE NORTH WALL OF |
| | THE PARKING GARAGE ON 2ND FLOOR FRAMING |
| | PLAN SHEET S-1.01, SEPARATES AREAS OF |
| | DIFFERENT FLOOR SLAB LEVEL.ON ONE SIDE |
| | IS THE 2ND FLOOR PARKING AND ON THE |
| | OTHER SIDE IS THE VOID ABOVE THE 1ST |
| | FLOOR COMMMERCIAL SPACE TO THE NORTH. |
| | IN FACT SHEET S-1.01 STATES "SLAB EDGE" |
| | AT THIS LOCATION.WALL TYPE W-30 IS A |
| | PARKING IMPACT WALL AND SHOULD BE SHOWN |
| | AS SUCH ON THE SHEET S-4-4.1 WALL |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 28) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
