| Date |
Text |
| 2006-07-23 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS |
| | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN |
| | REVIEW OF 2/10/06: |
| | |
| | 1) 713.13 F.S. NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | THE RESPONSE IS NOTED.INFORMATIVE: A |
| | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED |
| | AT PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE AND A |
| | COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. BLANK FORMS ARE |
| | AVAILABLE FROM THIS |
| | OFFICE. |
| | NOTE: THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE |
| | RE-RECORDED IF THE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT |
| | OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN |
| | 90 DAYS OF RECORDING. |
| | |
| | 2) IMPACT FEES. THE RESPONSE IS NOTED. |
| | INFORMATIVE: THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN |
| | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT |
| | FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE |
| | STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE |
| | PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 13-103.1.1.1 ENERGY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE FORMS.EACH COPY OF THE |
| | SUBMITTED ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM |
| | SHALL BE COMPLETED SO THAT SHEET 1 SHOWS |
| | THE OWNER, PROJECT ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, |
| | PERMIT NUMBER AND SHEET 2 MUST |
| | INCORPORATE THE ARCHITECTURAL FIRM |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN |
| | THE SPACE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 6) PRODUCT APPROVALS.SUBMITTAL OF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS IS NOTED. EACH PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SHALL HAVE A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL COVER SHEET.ALTERNATIVELY, AN |
| | APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED.THE FOLLOWING |
| | COMMENTS APPLY TO THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS: |
| | (A)MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM. |
| | SUBMITTAL OF GAF RUBERIOD ROOF SYSTEM |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 03-0501.03 IS |
| | NOTED.PAGES 9 THROUGH 30 SHALL BE |
| | MARKED TO SHOW WHICH ONE OUT OF THE MANY |
| | INCLUDED SYSTEM TYPES IS PROPOSED.THE |
| | CHOSEN SYSTEM MUST BE APPROPRIATE FOR |
| | THE CONRETE DECK SPECIFIED ON SHEET |
| | A-8.3.ALSO, IF ENHANCED FASTENER |
| | DENSITY IS REQUIRED TO IN ORDER TO MEET |
| | THE UPLIFT PRESSURES FOR ZONES 2 AND 3 |
| | (PER RWDI WIND LOAD STUDY REPORT), |
| | CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ROOFING APPLICATION |
| | STANDARD RAS 117. |
| | (B)ROOF TILE:THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA# 01-0703.04 IS FOR ENTERA |
| | ESTATE 'S' TILE.THIS DOES NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH ROOF DETAIL SHEET A-8.3 |
| | WHICH SPECIFIES ALTUSA SANTA FE 'S' |
| | TILE. THE PERMIT DOCUMENTS SHALL NOT |
| | INCORPORATE CONFLICTING PROPOSALS. |
| | ALSO, THE RWDI WIND LOAD STUDY REPORT |
| | STATES UPLIFT PRESSURES OF UP TO 170 PSF |
| | ON THE SLOPED ROOF.SUBMIT TILE |
| | ATTACHMENT CALCULATIONS TO JUSTIFY THE |
| | USE OF THE PROPOSED TILE AND ATTACHMENT |
| | METHOD FOR PRESSURES UPTO 170 PSF. |
| | (C)EXTERIOR DOORS.SUBMITTAL OF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR GLAZED ALUMINUM |
| | OUTSWING DOORS IS NOTED, BUT NO EXTERIOR |
| | DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. |
| | SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE |
| | STOREFRONT DOORS (9'-0" TALL), LOUVER |
| | DOORS, HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND ROLL-UP |
| | DOORS. |
| | (D)STOREFRONT.THE SUBMITTED ARCH |
| | ALUMINUM SERIES L-300 IMPACT WALL |
| | STOREFRONT PRODUCT NOA# 01-0619.01 |
| | STATES A MAXIMUM UNIT HEIGHT OF 144". |
| | THIS IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE SIZE |
| | OF STOREFRONT SPECIFIED ON SHEETS A-4.1 |
| | AND A-4.2 OF THE PLANS.SUBMIT AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (E)SLIDING GLASS DOORS.THE |
| | SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SYSTEMS SERIES 100 |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 01-0123.02 HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | RATING OF 100 PSF (BOTH POSITIVE AND |
| | NEGATIVE) AND A MAXIMUM DOOR HEIGHT OF |
| | 102".PER THE SUBMITTED RWDI WIND LOAD |
| | STUDY REPORT THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS |
| | WILL BE SUBJECT TO NEGATIVE WIND |
| | PRESSURE OF -110 PSF WHICH EXCEEDS THAT |
| | ALLOWED BY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.ALSO, |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.1 SHOWS A |
| | PROPOSED SLIDING GLASS DOOR HEIGHT OF |
| | 10'-0" WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM COVERED |
| | BY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL.SUBMIT AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | (F)SINGLE HUNG WINDOW.THE |
| | SUBMITTED MIAMI WALL SERIES 122 ALUMINUM |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 03-1008.03 HAS A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 72". |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.2 SHOWS SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOW HEIGHTS UP TO 9'-4" WHICH |
| | EXCEED THE MAXIMUM COVERED BY THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL.ALSO, IS IT THE |
| | INTENTION TO INSTALL THIS WINDOW ON TOP |
| | OF THE FIXED WINDOW TO FORM THE 'SINGLE |
| | HUNG WINDOW OVER FIXED WINDOW' |
| | CONFIGURATION THAT IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET? SUBMIT AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT COVERS |
| | WINDOWS OF THE REQUIRED HEIGHT. |
| | (G) FIXED WINDOW.SUBMITTAL OF THE |
| | MIAMI WALL SERIES 122 ALUMINUM FIXED |
| | WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 04-0322.09 |
| | IS NOTED.FROM THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET A-4.2, IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHERE THIS PRODUCT IS TO BE USED. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | (H)MULLIONS.IN ADDRESSING THE |
| | ABOVE COMMENTS PLEASE NOTE THAT SOME OF |
| | THE WINDOW CONFIGURATION MAY REQUIRE |
| | MULLIONS.IF SO PLEASE SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR APPROPRIATE MULLIONS. |
| | (I)IF THERE IS A STATEWIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL THAT COVERS ANY OF THE |
| | SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA'S, THE |
| | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET |
| | MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE FRONT OF THE |
| | NOA. |
| | |
| | 11) FBC* 104.2.1FIRE SEPARATION PLANS. |
| | RECOMMENDATION:THE INCLUSION OF A |
| | LEGEND ON SHEET A-2.1.2 IS NOTED. |
| | HOWEVER, THERE IS STILL SOME AMBIGUITY |
| | IN THE PLANS.FOR EXAMPLE, ON SHEETS |
| | A-2.1.4 AND A-2.1.5, THE WALLS ADJACENT |
| | TO THE BREEZEWAY HAVE NO SHADING BUT |
| | THEY HAVE A NOTE STATING A 2-HOUR FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE RATING.THE LIFE SAFETY |
| | PLANS LS-1 TO LS-5 ARE NOT |
| | OVER-COMPLICATED.PLEASE CONSIDER USING |
| | THEM TO CLARIFY THE FIRE RESISTANCE |
| | RATING OF THE WALLS WITH 'DASHED' LINE |
| | TYPES AND A CORRESPONDING LEGEND. |
| | |
| | 12) FBC 1012.1.29TH FLOOR CLUBROOM. |
| | THE DOUBLE DOORS FROM THE CLUBROOM TO |
| | THE CORRIDOR SHALL SWING IN THE |
| | DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM THE CLUBROOM. |
| | AMEND THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 16) FBC 411.2.3VEHICLE IMPACT |
| | WALLS/GUARDRAILS.IT IS NOTED THAT |
| | SHEETS A-2.7.1 TO A-2.7.4 NOW REFER TO |
| | THE STRUCTURAL PLANS.WALL TYPE W-30 IS |
| | SHOWN AT THE NORTH WALL OF THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE, ON 2ND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SHEET |
| | S-1.01.PLEASE CONFIRM THAT WALL TYPE |
| | W-30 IS A PARKING IMPACT WALL, ASTHE |
| | WALL SCHEDUKE ON SHEET S-4.1, DOES NOT |
| | STATE THAT IT IS. |
| | |
| | 20) FBC 2603.6.4DYPLAST MOLDINGS, |
| | SHEET A-6.9.THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| | PROPERLY ADDRESSED.CONTRARY TO THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE SHEETT, NO DYPLAST |
| | PRODUCT DATA WAS SUBMITTED.THE |
| | SUBMITTED URETHANE TECHNOLOGIES TEST |
| | REPORT# 542317 IS FOR UTD FR SPRAY COAT. |
| | IN ANY EVENT, THE REPORT SHOWS A FLAME |
| | SPREAD INDEX OF 30.FBC 2603.6.4 |
| | REQUIRES AFLAME SPREAD INDEX OF 25 OR |
| | LESS.PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION FOR THE |
| | FLAME SPREAD AND COMBUSTIBILITY OF THE |
| | DYPLAST MOLDINGS. |
| | |
| | 26) FBC 11-4.1.3SHEETS A-2.1.2 AND |
| | A-2.1.3 NOW SHOW A 1-3/4" SLAB RECESS. |
| | THE NOTES REFER TO ID DRAWINGS BUT NO ID |
| | PLANS WERE SUBMITTED.PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | THE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL TO |
| | MAINTAIN THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGH |
| | THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 27)FBC 1015.2 GUARDRAIL HEIGHT.SHEET |
| | A-7.6, SECTION C AND SHEET A-7.7, |
| | SECTION C NOW SHOW A LOW WALL DETAIL |
| | THAT PROVIDES A 'STEP' WHICH WOULD |
| | REDUCE THE EFFECTIVE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | GUARDRAIL.A CHAMFERED EDGE SHOULD BE |
| | INCORPORATED LIKE THAT WHICH WAS |
| | INDICATED ON SHEET A-3.5, SECTIONS 2 AND |
| | 3. |
| | |
| | 28) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL |
| | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD |
| | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW |
| | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD |
| | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE |
| | REMAINING OLD SHEETS, TO FORM A SET OF |
| | 'OLD/VOID SHEETS', FOR COMPARISON OF |
| | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
