| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-23 13:26:57 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | *******DENIED******* |
| | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | SUBMITTAL ON 7/20/07 FOR CALCULATIONS, SHOP DRAWINGS, |
| | AND PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR STOREFRONT |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 |
| | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) |
| | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1) AS STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW OF THESE DOCUMENTS |
| | ON 6/26/07, THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT ARE FOR PRODUCTS |
| | DIFFERENT FROM THE THOSE THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN |
| | REVIEWED/STAMPED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE CONSIDERED |
| | REVISIONS AND A REVISION FEE IS DUE.THE PACKET WAS |
| | AGAIN INCORRECTLY SUBMITTED AS A ZERO FEE SUBMITTAL. |
| | IT IS A REVISION AND THE APPROPRIATE REVISION FEE OF |
| | $50 PLUS $10 FOR EACH NEW PRODUCT HAS NOW BEEN APPLIED |
| | ONCE FOR THE ORIGINAL REVISION SUBMITTAL AND AGAIN FOR |
| | THIS RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE REVISION.THE OUTSTANDING FEE |
| | IS $200 [CALCULATED AS 2X(50 + 5X10)]. |
| | |
| | 2) FBC* 1606.1THE CONTINENTAL GLASS SYSTEM SERIES |
| | 3000 ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL SYSTEM PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# |
| | 05-1220.18 STATES THAT THE MAXIMUM NEGATIVE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE SHALL NOT EXCEED -110 PSF.HOWEVER, SHEET 5 |
| | OF THE THE SUBMITTED ENGINEERING EXPRESS (FRANK |
| | BENNARDO, P.E.) SHOP DRAWINGS SHOWS THE A REQUIREMENT |
| | FOR NEGATIVE PRESSURE OF -130 PSF, AND REFERS TO |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS TO JUSTIFY EXCEEDING THE -110 PSF |
| | NEGATIVE DESIGN PRESSURE LIMIT OF THE PROPOSED PRODUCT. |
| | NO RATIONAL ANALYSIS WAS SUBMITTED.SUBMIT ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED RATIONAL ANALYSIS CALCULATION |
| | SHEETS. |
| | BECAUSE THE REVIEW OF THE SHOP DRAWINGS CANNOT BE |
| | COMPLETED WITHOUT THE REFERENCE ATIONAL ANALYSIS |
| | CALCULATIONS, ALL COPIES OF THE STAMPED PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS HAVE BEEN RETURNED.NO COPIES HAVE BEEN |
| | RETAINED, SO THEY WILL ALL NEED TO BE RE-SUBMITTED AS A |
| | COMPLETE PACKAGE WHEN THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS |
| | CALCULATIONS AND THE SHOP DRAWINGS ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALL BEEN REVIEWED ALREADY THEY MAY |
| | ALL BE BROUGHT IN AS ZERO FEE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PURPOSE OF THE SUBMITTED "TUBE STEEL |
| | CALCULATIONS" FROM ENGINEERING EXPRESS (FRANK BENNARDO, |
| | P.E.) COULD NOT BE DETERMINED.HOWEVER IT IS NOTED |
| | THAT THESE CALCULATIONS MAKE REPEATED REFERENCE TO A |
| | WIND PRESSURE OF 49 PSF.ACCORDING TO THE RWDI WIND |
| | TUNNEL TEST REPORT THERE IS NO LOCATION ON THIS |
| | BUILDING WITH A WIND PRESSURE AS LOW AS 49 PSF.ALL |
| | SUBMITTED COPIES OF THESE CALCULATIONS ARE BEING |
| | RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR. |
| | |
| | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** |
| | |
| | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO |
| | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
