Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 05091265
Permit Number 05091265
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2006-07-30 00:00:00ONE ROLL IN ELECTRIC FOR REVIEW.
 REVIEW IN PROGRESS.
 *********** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW **********
  
  
 ** THIS OFFICE HAS STATED ON NUMEROUS
 OCCASIONS FOR THE DESIGN TEAM TO TAKE
 SOME ADDITIONAL TIME BEFORE RESUBMITTING
 PLANS AND EVEN AFTER RESUBMITTING PLANS
 TO GO OVER PLANS CAREFULLY. THIS OFFICE
 HAS STATED IF DESIGN TEAM FINDS ITEMS
 BEFORE REVIEWS ARE STARTED THEN THOSE
 SHEETS MAY BE CHANGED OUT. PLEASE SEE
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS BELOW.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS
 REVIEW AND SOME NEW NOTES WHICH NEED TO
 BE ADDRESSED.
 PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN
 DIRECTLY FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NEW
 NOTES ARE ADDED TO THE LOWER PORTION OF
 REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
  
 CITY PALMS
 10-STORY CONDO
  
 1)NOTE: NO. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 NOTE #1, NO, PLEASE SEE NEW NOTE
 PERTAINING TO THE NEW 2004 FBC AND
 CHAPTER 13.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW **
 PLEASE KNOW, PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR
 "PLAN REVIEW" ONLY AND WERE NOT
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT BEFORE THE CODE
 CHANGE OF OCT 1ST, 2005 TO THE NEW
 2004 FBC.
 PLEASE SEE THAT ANY CHANGES WILL BE
 NEEDED WHEN SUBMITTING FOR PERMIT.
  
 2)NOTE: OK.
  
 3)NOTE: OK.
  
 4)NOTE: OK.
  
 5)NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE KNOW THE YEAR
 STATED ON PREVIOUS NOTE FOR NFPA-20 WAS
 1999 WHICH WAS MIS-STATED. THIS SHOULD
 HAVE BEEN 2003. IN EITHER CASE THIS CAN
 BE REDLINED AND NOTHING FROM THE 1999 TO
 THE 2003 APPEARED TO CHANGE DESIGN OR
 AFFECT PLANS.
  
  
 6)NOTE: OK.
  
 7)NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PHOTO-METRICS
 PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE SHEETS FOR CORIDORS
 AND STAIRS SHOW LEVELS 7-8 ONLY.
 SEE SHEETS WHICH INDICATE GRND FLOOR AND
 2-5 ONLY CONTAIN SOME AREAS. PLEASE SEE
 MSSING OTHER LEVELS ETC.
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR
 ALL COMMON AREA EGRESS PATHS.
 IF ALL CORRIDORS GOING UP THROUGH
 BUILDIGN ARE THE SAME, THESE CAN BE ON
 TYPICAL FLR DETAIL FOR FLRS "X"-"?".
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 NOTE #7NO, PLEASE SEE SOME
 WERE SUBMITTED FOR GARAGE AND CORRIDORS,
 HOWEVER STAIRWAYS COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
 PLEASE ALSO KNOW, LEVELS UNDER EM POWER
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE "PHOTO-METRICS"
 FOR ALL CORRIDORS, STAIRWELLS AND EGRESS
 AREAS PER 2003 NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9.
 PLEASE SEE A MIN OF 10 FT CANDLES IS NOW
 REQUIRED FOR STAIR TOWERS UNDER NORMAL
 EGRESS CONDITIONS.
  
 8)NOTE: OK.
  
  
 8)NOTE: OK.
  
 9)NOTE: OK.
  
 10)NOTE: OK.
  
 11)NOTE: OK.
  
 12)NOTE: OK.
  
 13)NOTE: OK.
  
 14)NOTE: OK.
  
 15)NOTE: OK.
  
 16)NOTE: OK.
  
 17)NOTE: OK.
  
 18)NOTE: OK.
  
 19)NOTE: OK.
  
 20)NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 PLEASE SHOW CIRCUITING FOR ALL UNITS AND
 CORRELATE WITH THE PANEL SCHEDULES
 SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW, CODE COMPLIANCE
 FOR SOME ITEMS CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS
 TIME.
  
 21)NOTE: OK.
  
 22)NOTE: OK.
  
 23)NOTE: OK.
  
 24)NOTE: OK.
  
 25)NOTE: OK.
  
 26)NOTE: OK.
  
 27)NOTE: OK.
  
 28)NOTE: OK.
  
 29)NOTE: OK.
  
 30)NOTE: OK.
  
 31)NOTE: OK.
  
 32)NOTE: OK.
  
 33)NOTE: OK.
  
 34)NOTE: OK.
  
 35)NOTE: OK.
  
 36)NOTE: OK.
  
 37)NOTE: OK, HOWEVER NOTE PERTAINING TO
 THE GROUNDING AND THE GENERATOR BEING
 SEPARATELY DERIVED WAS REMOVED. THE NOT
 SHOULD HAVE REMAINED, ONLY ADJUSTED TO
 READ GENERATOR IS SEPARATELY DERIVED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 NOTE #37 NO, PLEASE SEE NO
 SPECS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE ALSO SEE
 RISER INDICATES THE 4-POLE ATS, HOWEVER
 NOTES MENITON THIS IS NOT A SEPARATELY
 DERIVED GENERATOR? PLEASE SEE AS A
 4-POLE ATS, THE GEN IS "SEP DERIVED" AND
 GROUNDING SHALL BE DONE ACCORDINGLY.
 PLEASE SEE MISSING BONDING AT FIRST
 MENAS OF DISCONNECT , EQUIPMENT GROUNDD
 ETC. PLEASE SEE NFPA-110 6.2.15*. PLEASE
 VERIFY WITH MANUFACTURE OF EQUIPMENT.
 PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES FOR ATS AND MAIN.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 PLEASE SUBMIT ALL INFORMATION
 FOR GENERATOR/ ATS. PLEASE SUBMIT THE
 SPECS/CUT FROM MANUFACTURE.
 PLEASE VERIFY OF THE ATS WILL BE A
 4-POLE SWITCH.
 PLEASE SEE 700.7D AND IF YOU HAVE THE
 HANDBOOK, SEE EXPLANATION OF ARTICLE.
 I HAVE ATTACHED BOTH, JUST IN CASE.
  
 (D) GROUND FAULT. TO INDICATE A GROUND
 FAULT IN SOLIDLY GROUNDED WYE
 EMERGENCY SYSTEMS OF MORE THAN 150 VOLTS
 TO GROUND AND CIRCUIT-PROTECTIVE
 DEVICES RATED 1000 AMPERES OR MORE. THE
 SENSOR FOR THE GROUND-FAULT SIGNAL
 DEVICES SHALL BE LOCATED AT, OR AHEAD
 OF, THE MAIN SYSTEM DISCONNECTING
 MEANS FOR THE EMERGENCY SOURCE, AND THE
 MAXIMUM SETTING OF THE SIGNAL
 DEVICES SHALL BE FOR A GROUND-FAULT
 CURRENT OF 1200 AMPERES. INSTRUCTIONS
 ON THE COURSE OF ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN
 EVENT OF INDICATED GROUND FAULT
 SHALL BE LOCATED AT OR NEAR THE SENSOR
 LOCATION.
  
 ALTHOUGH 700.26 INDICATES THAT
 GROUND-FAULT PROTECTION OF EQUIPMENT IS
 NOT
 REQUIRED ON THE ALTERNATE SOURCE FOR
 EMERGENCY SYSTEMS, GROUND FAULTS CAN
 OCCUR ON SUCH SYSTEMS, AND THEY CAN
 RESULT IN EQUIPMENT BURNDOWN. BECAUSE
 OF THE EMERGENCY NATURE OF SUCH SYSTEMS,
 AUTOMATIC DISCONNECT IN THE EVENT
 OF A GROUND FAULT IS INAPPROPRIATE.
 DETECTION OF SUCH A FAULT, HOWEVER, IS
 DESIRABLE SO THAT THE CONDITION CAN BE
 CORRECTED.
 IN MY READING AND THE INFORMATION FROM A
 COULE OF MANUFACURES OF ATS SWITCHES, A
 4-POLE ATS IS REQUIRED. PLEASE RESERCH
 THE INFORMATION AND ADJUST.
  
 38)NOTE: OK.
  
 39)NOTE:OK, HOWEVER SEE NOTE ABOVE
 ABOUT THE GEN BE SD.PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT
 SINCE ONLY ONE "DRAWING KEYNOTE RISER'
 IS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. PLEASE SEE NOTE
 #11 MISPRINTS STATING 230.79 TWICE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 NOTE #39 YES/ NO, PLEASE NOW
 SEE TWO SETS OF DRAWING KEYNOTES, WHICH
 AS NOTED IN ONE SET MOST DO NOT
 CORRELATE WITH RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE SEE
 SOME COMMENTS FOR OTHER.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 PLEASE COMPLETE DRAWING KEYNOTES TO
 CORRELATE WITH PLANS.
  
 40)NOTE: OK.
  
 41)NOTE: OK.
  
 42)NOTE: OK.
  
  
 **************************************
 *************************************
 ******** NEW NOTES 2ND REVIEW *********
  
  
 43) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEEE THE ONLY TYPE
 WRITTEN RESPONSE WAS DATED FEB 2006.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE KNOW, A FULL AND
 COMPLETE TYPE WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM THE
 DESIGN TEAM WHICH RESPONSES TO THE PLANS
 REVIEWERS COMMENTS WILL HELP IN
 EXPEDITING THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. THIS
 NUMERICAL REPONSE WILL HELP TO
 ALLEAVIATE ANY BACK AND FORTH QUESTIONS
 OR CONFUSION.
 NO, RESPONSE LETTERS WERE SUBMITTED WHEN
 PLANS WERE BROUGHT BACK FOR REVIEW.
  
 44) NOTE: NO, SAME NOTE. PLEASE SEE THE
 SAME BOOKS AND CALCULATIONS WERE
 SUBMITTED BACK WITH ANY CORRECTIONS OR
 CHANGES.
 PLEASE SEE MOST OF THE BOOKS AND
 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT SIGNED, DATED OR
 SEALED AND THE ONES THAT ARE SIGN/SEALED
 ARE STILL THE SAME. PLEASE SEE THIS SEAL
 WITH THE WORDING OF "CERTIFICATE" IS NO
 LONGER ACCEPTABLE.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE ALL PLANS, SHEETS,
 DOCUMENTS BEING SIGNED, DATED OR SEALED
 BY A LICENSED PE, SHALL ONLY CONTAIN A
 SEAL WITH THE WORDING OF "LICENSE".
 PLEASE SEE A RULING BY THE FLORIDA BOARD
 OF PROFESSINAL ENGINEERS DATED IN
 FEBUARY "04", RULED IN 61G15-23.001,
 THAT ALL SEALS SHALL NO LONGER USE
 "CERTIFICATE" IN SAID SEAL. PLEAS KNOW,
 AN EXTENSION WAS GIVEN TO THE DATE OF
 DEC. 31ST , 2005.PLEASE SEE THIS IS
 NOT A COMMENT FOR STEVEN FELLER AS SEAL
 IS CORRECT. PLEASE SEE OTHER DOCUMENTS
 SUBMITTED DO CONTAIN THE SEAL WHICH IS
 NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE.
 PLEASE SEE DE LOS REYES ENG.AND ANY
 OTHERS WHICH MAY STILL BE UTILIZING OLD
 SEAL.
 PLEASE KNOW, THIS COMMENT IS MADE FOR
 ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS WHETHER OR NOT
 COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S).
  
 45) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE CALCULATIONS
 ARE STILL SHOWING ALL CALCULATIONS FROM
 THE 2001 FBC. PLEASE SEE THESE WERE
 SIGNED AND SEALED AFTER THE CODE CHANGE
 YET STILL WERE DONE UNDER THE 2001 FBC.
 PLEASE SEE CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE
 VERIFIED FOR COMPLIANCE OF LIGHTING
 LEVELS, CONTROLS ETC.
 PLEASE BE SURE THE CALCUALTIONS MEET THE
 PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER
 13-415.1.AB.1,13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES
 415.2.C.1, 415.2.B.1 ETC
 PLEASE ALSO SEE NUMEROUS AREAS/ROOMS
 WHICH FALL UNDER SEPARATE SPACES ON
 MULTIPLE FLOORS WHICHSTIL DO NOT
 CONTAIN REQUIRED CONTROL DEVICES. PLEASE
 KNOW, IN A MEETING HELD BEFORE PLANS
 WERE SUBMITTED THE FUTURE RETAIL
 COMMERICAL SPACES WERE SHOWN WITH TIME
 CLOCKS AND OVER RIDES DEVICES AND THE
 COMMENT WAS MADE BY THIS REVIEWER THAT
 ONLY THE TC'S WERE NOT REQUIRED IF AN
 TIMED DEVICE OR OCCUPANCY SENSOR WAS
 PRESENT. PLEASE SEE ALL LIGHTING
 CONTROLS WERE REMOVED COMPLETELY>???
 PLEASE SEE SECTION BELOW FOR SEPARATE
 SPCES.
 MOST OF THESE AREAS HAVE BEEN REDLINED
 AND HIGHLIGHTED FOR MISSING CONTROLS
 REQUIRED.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE FBC 2004 CHAPTER
 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, &.2, &.3.
 PLEASE SHOW AND PROVIDE DEVICES,
 CONTROLS ETC FOR ALL AREAS NOW REQUIRED
 TO CONTAIN ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES.
 PLEASE SEE 13-413.1ABC.1 AND PROVIDE
 NOTES/WORST CASE FOR VOLTAGE DROP.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.2 FOR AREA
 LIGHTING.
 PLEASE SEE THESE CHANGES ARE COMPLETELY
 DIFFERENT FORM THE 2001 FBC.
 THESE CHANGES BECAME FEDERALLY MANDATED
 FOR ALL STATES TO COMPLY IN THE NEXT
 CODE CYCLE/CHANGE. THIS FEDERAL MANDATE
 WAS PASSED JULY 2004
 PLEASE SEE NOTE #1 FROM PREVIOUS REVIE
 MENTIONED TO SEE ALL 2004 FBC FOR ALL
 CHANGES IN DESIGN AS PROJECT WAS NOT
 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT UNDER THE 2001 FBC.
  
 46) NOTE: OK.
  
 47) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE NEW NOTES DUE
 TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR GENERATOR.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 A) PLEASE SEE NFPA-110, 7.9.3.1,
 GALVANIZED LINES SHALL NOT BE USED FOR
 PIPNG TO GENERATOR. THIS IS NOTED FOR
 PLUMBING/ ENGINEERING AS SOME LOCATIONS
 IN THE JURISDICTION HAS INSTALLED THESE
 AND HAVE HAD TO CHANGE TYPES OF PIPING.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS IS A NOTE AT THIS TIME
 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY.
 B) PLEASE ALSO SEE NFPA-20, NFPA-110 ,
 NOTES AND SPECS FOR FUEL TYPE AND
 STORAGE WAS NOTE SUBMITTED, PLEASE SEE
 MIN RUNNING TIME CAN NOT BE VERIFIED.
 PLEASE SEE 6-6.2 FOR A MIN OF 8 HRS
 @100% ALONG WITH ALL OTHER MIN REQUIRED
 LIFE SAFETY LOADS.
 THE AMOUNT OF FUEL, AND GPH SHOULD BE
 NOTED ON PLANS. ONE OF THE DRAWING KEY
 NOTES MENTIONS 500 GAL TANK?TBD.
  
 48) NOTE: OK.
  
 49) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE SOME FIXTURE
 DESIGNATIONS ARE STILL NOT ON PLANS.
 PLEASE SEE REDLINED PLANS. EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE FIXTURE ON 2.04, COMM #4
 SPACE. PLEASE SEE SOME FIXTURES ON
 PLANS DO NOT CONTAIN FIXTURE
 DESIGNATIONS.
 "REDLINED ON PLANS"
  
 50) NOTE: OK.
  
 51) NOTE: OK.
  
 52) NOTE: OK.
  
 53) NOTE: OK. SEE NEW NOTES.
  
 54) NOTE: OK.
  
 55) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THAT THE
 GENERATOR IS A SD SYSTEM AND THE FIRST
 MEANS OF DISCONNECT PER 250.24B IS NOW
 THE BREAKER(S) LOCATED ON THE GEN.
 PLEASE SEE FEEDERS F-8 AND F-9 AS THESE
 WILL BOTH REQUIRED "EQUIPMENT GROUNDING
 CONDUCTORS".
 210.110,250.24B,250.122
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH
 RESPECT TO THE ATS AND 4-POLE,
 SEPARATELY DERIVED SYSTEM.
 PLEASE SEE 250.6,250.24B AND 250.122 FOR
 SIZING ANY EQUIPMENT GORUNDING
 CONDUCTORS.
  
 56) NOTE: OK.
  
 57) NOTE: OK.
  
 58) NOTE: NO, SAME COMMENT, THIS WAS
 REDLINED ON PLANS ONCE AGAIN.
 PLEASE SEE "LOAD SUMMARY" ON E5.01,
 PLEASE SE "*" AS NOTE, AND ADDED "*"
 NEXT TO THE LINE FOR FIRE PUMP.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE LOAD SUMMARY FOR
 FIRE PUMP ON RISER WHICH CONTAINS AN "*"
 ASTERISK FOR NOTE OF MAGNETIC ONLY 6X
 LR, HOWEVER THIS "*" IS NOT ABOVE FOR
 FIRE PUMP. SEE REDLINES THIS IS NOTED AS
 PLANS ARE COMING BACK FOR COMMENTS.
  
 59) NOTE: OK.
  
 60) NOTE: OK.
  
 61) NOTE: NO, THIS IS YET TBD. THIS DOES
 NOT NEED TO BE DONE OR NOTED ON PLANS
 NOW. IF INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM
 THE LAST MEETING PLEASE PLACE ON RISER.
 PLEASE KNOW THE ARCHITECT WAS GOING TO
 CALL TO FIND THIS OUT.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 PLEASE PROVIDE ELEVATION FOR
 EPSS. PLEASE SEENFPA-110 7.2.3*,THE
 ELEVATION OF THE EPSS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE
 THE "SLOSH" PREDICATION LEVELS.
 "SEA, LAKE, OVERLAND SURGES BY
 HURRICANCES. CHARTS BASED ON SURGES FROM
 A CAT 4 STORM.
  
 62) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE BE SURE TO
 DO THE SAME.
  
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE **
 WHEN AND BEFORE RESUBMITTING
 PLANS, PLEASE COMPLETELY REMOVE ANY AND
 ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FROM SETS. PLEASE
 ONLY INSERT ONLY NEW REVISED SHEETS INTO
 COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STMAPING.
 PLEASE KNOW, THIS WAS DONE ON THIS
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 ***************************************
 ****** NEW NOTES 3RD REVIEW *********
  
 63) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW,THIS IS THE FIRST
 REVIEW WHERE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT
 SHEETS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR A
 COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE GENERATOR. PLEASE
 SEE THAT PLANS AND DESIGN HAS CHANGED
 FROM PREVIOUS PLANS WHICH CONTAINED A
 DAY TANK LOCATED IN THE ROOM. PLEASE SEE
 NFPA-20 (2003)OR 1999 AS BOTH REQUIRE
 THE SAME.
 9.6.2.2 THE FUEL SUPPLY CAPACITY SHALL
 BE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE 8 HOURS OF FIRE
 PUMP OPERATION AT 100 PERCENT OF THE
 RATED PUMP CAPACITY IN ADDITION TO THE
 SUPPLY REQUIRED FOR OTHER DEMANDS.(2003)
 OR
 6-6.2* (1999)
 THESE POWER SOURCES SHALL COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 6-4 AND SHALL MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF LEVEL 1, TYPE 10, CLASS
 X SYSTEMS OF NFPA 110, STANDARD FOR
 EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER SYSTEMS. THE
 FUEL SUPPLY CAPACITY SHALL BE SUFFICIENT
 TO PROVIDE 8 HOURS OF FIRE PUMP
 OPERATION AT 100 PERCENT OF THE RATED
 PUMP CAPACITY IN ADDITION TO THE SUPPLY
 REQUIRED FOR OTHER DEMANDS.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW UPON THE REVIEW OF SPECS,
 THE GENERATOR SHOWS A CONSUMPTION OF
 119GPH OR 450LPH. PLEASE SEE BASED ON A
 500 GAL SUB- BASE TANK THIS WOULD ONLY
 PROVIDE ENOUGH FUEL FOR 4.20 HRS. PLEASE
 ADJUST GENERATOR FOR ONE THAT WILL RUN
 ON SUBSTANTIALLY LESS FUEL OR INCREASE
 TANK SIZE.
 PLEASE SUBMIT SPEC/MANUFACTURE SHEETS ON
 FUEL TANK IF GOING TO A LARGER TANK OR
 SUBMIT SPECS/MANIFACTURE SHEET IF
 CHANGING GENERATOR.
  
 64) NOTE: PLEASE SEE UNIT "B1" MISSING
 CIRCUIT #22 ON PANEL SCHEDULE. (THIS CAN
 BE REDLINED).
  
 65) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COPY OF
 THE FS 553.80(2)(B) WIHT RESPECT TO
 DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND REPEAT COMMENTS
 FOR CODE COMPLIAMCE.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE GIVEN
 AT THIS TIME.
  
 66) NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PACKAGES,
 PLEASE PLACE ALL SPEC/MANUFACTURES CUT
 SHEETS IN BINDERS WITH TABS/LABELS FOR
 EASY LOCATING AND REVIEW. PLEASE SEE
 MANY SHEETS ARE ONLY PLACED INDIVIDUALLY
 IN BOXES OR IN FOLDERS.
 PLACING PRODUCT APPROVALS AND SPEC IN
 BINDERS WOULD GREATLY HELP IN THE REVIEW
 PROCESS ALSO.
  
 ** PLEASE SEE LOCATIONS ON PLANS IN
 WHICH MANY OF THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN
 REDLINED AT LOCATIONS OF COMMENTS.
  
 ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF ANY COMMENTS FROM
 OTHER REVIEWER(S) WHICH MAY HAVE AN
 AFFECT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS.
  
 ** PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED PLANS FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING
 THIS OFFICE.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved