| Date |
Text |
| 2005-12-21 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS COVER PAGES |
| | SUBMITTED AND DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T |
| | MATCH. NEED TO PROVIDE THE EXACT SAME |
| | DRAWINGS THAT WERE SUBMITTED TO OBTAIN |
| | THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 2- ACCORDING TO THE KEY PLAN THERE ARE |
| | 20 ACCORDION SHUTTERS, 4 ALUMINUM PANELS |
| | AND 1 STEEL PANEL. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | FOR A)STEEL PANELS,B)ALUMINUM PANELS |
| | ANDC) ACCORDION SHUTTERS. PACKAGE |
| | SUBMITTED ON ITEM #1 WAS MISSING THE |
| | STEEL PANELS PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 3- A) WHEN SUBMITTING DRAWINGS THAT |
| | MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, PLEASE |
| | MAKE SURE THAT ANCHOR SPACING SPECIFIED |
| | IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH ANCHOR SCHEDULE |
| | SHOWNON DRAWINGS. ANCHOR SCHEDULE |
| | SUBMITTED NOW DOESN'T WORK. |
| | |
| | B) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IS MISSING |
| | ANCHOR SPACING FOR OPENINGS #10, #11. |
| | |
| | C) CLEARLY INDICATE WHICH SHUTTERS |
| | ARESTEEL AND WHICH ARE ALUMINUM. ALSO, |
| | CLEARLY INDICATE IN DRAWINGS ANCHOR |
| | SCHEDULE SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS |
| | AND ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED |
| | ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN PRESSURE, EDGE |
| | DISTANCE, CONNECTION TYPE ANC STRUCTURE |
| | TO BE ATTACHED TO (CONCRETE, CONCRETE |
| | BLOCK OR WOOD) TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SEC. |
| | 104.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2001. |
| | |
| | **NOTE: ATTACHED IS A REVISED SAMPLE OF |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULEWHICH SUMMARIZES |
| | ALLREQUIRED INFORMATION FOR PLAN |
| | REVIEW AND IS VERY HELPFUL FOR |
| | INSPECTORS, PLAN REVIEWERS AND EVEN |
| | INSTALLERS. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
