Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 05091151
Permit Number 05091151
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2006-04-27 00:00:00********* UNSAT 3RD REVIEW **********
  
 PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM FIRST REVIEWAND
 2ND REVIEW WHICH STILL NEED TO BE
 ADDRESSED, ALONG WITH NEW COMMENTS DUE
 TO PLANS AND INFORMAITON SUBMITTED..
 PLEASE SEE THE LAST NEW COMMENT.
  
  
 1)NOTE: NOTE #1 OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE
 NEW COMMENTS.
  
 2)NOTE: NOTE #2 NO, STILL ONLY
 SUBMITTING ONE SET, NOTHING FOR THE
 GENERATOR AND NOTHING FOR NEW PROPOSEED
 PROPANE TANK. TANK.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 HOWEVER MUST SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ALL.
 PLEASE SEE SPECS FOR FUEL TANK SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO VERIFY LISTING. PLEASE
 KNOW, IT WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED UNDER THE
 SEPARATE PERMIT AS NOTED BY OTHERS.
  
 3)NOTE: NOTE #3NO, PLEASE SEE NEW
 PLANS AND RISER IS NOW SUBMITTED, YET
 PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE
 NEW ATS'S, NOR DOES IT INDICAT ANY
 DISCONNECTING MEANS FOR THE FEEDERS
 COMING FROM GEN.?
 PLEASE SEE 225.31-225.39,110.27.
  
 **PREVIOUS NOTE **
 RISER SUBMITTED, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE NOTE
 #1 AND PLEASE ALSO SEE MAINS WILL BE
 REQUIRED AT THE BLDG GROUPED IN CLOSE
 PROXIMITY OF EXISTING MAINS AND SHALL BE
 LABELD AS REQUIRED IN 702.8, 230.2 ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW, THE BRKRS LOCATED INSIDE
 THE GENERATOR WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AS
 THE MEANS OF DISCONNECT FOR THESE
 FEEDERS COMING UP INTO BLDG.
 225.31-225.39
  
 4)NOTE: NOTE #4 NO, PLEASE SEE THE SAME
 LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED WHICH
 ARE FOR RESIDENTIAL. PLEASE HAVE THE NEW
 ENGINEER OF RECORD SUPPLY.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 NO, THIS WAS NOT DONE.
 PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE LOAD
 CALCULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY,
 PLEASE INCLUDE ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT
 125%.
 A/C LOADS ALREADY SHOWN.
 220.3,220.10,220.11,220.13,215.3,230.42
 ETC
  
 5)NOTE: NOTE #5 OK, HOWEVER SEE SLAB
 DETAIL COMMENT BELOW.
  
 **PREVIOUS NOTE **
 OK, NOT AN ELECTRICAL
 COMMENT. PLEASE SEE BLDG REVIEW COMMENTS
 FOR TIE DOWN AND SLAB DETAIL.
  
 6)NOTE: NOTE #6 OK, HOWEVER, SEE NEW
 PLAN NOTES.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 OK. MIANS INDICATED
 OUTSIDE.
  
 7)NOTE:NOTE #7 OK, CORRECTED TO PVC.
  
  
 8)NOTE: NOTE #8 NO, PLEASE THIS WAS NOT
 DONE, IN FACT PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE NEW
 COPYOF THE SURVEY/SITE PLANS WAS
 SUBMITTED, AND IT DID NOT CONTAIN THE
 ORIG REVIEW BY THE ZONING TECH.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE NEW SURVEY SHEET NOW
 DOES NOT CONTAINTHE GEN, ATS, SETBACK,
 LOCATIONS ETC OF THE PROPOSED WORK.??
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE THE BELOW COMMENT FOR
 SURVEY WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW ,
 HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT ADDRESSED.
 ***************************************
 PLEASE BE SURE TO PROVIDE A 2ND COPY OF
 SURVEY WHICH IS NOT "PENCILED".
 ***************************************
  
 NEW NOTES.
  
 1)NOTE:OK.
  
 2)NOTE: OK, HOWEVER LEAVE THIS IS SETS
 WHEN RE-SUBMITTING.
  
 3)NOTE: NOTE #3 OK, NEW RECORDED NOC WAS
 SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW, THIS NOC IS ONLY
 VALID FOR 90 DAYS FROM RECORDING DATE,
 UNLESS WORK COMMENCES. PLEASE KNOW, IT
 WAS 2+ MONTHS BEFORE PLANS WERE
 RE-SUBMITTED. SINCE PLANS ARE COMING
 BACK ONCE MORE, PLEASE BE SURE TO
 RESUBMIT PLANS IN A TIMELY FASHION TO
 AVOID THE NOC BECOMING VOID.
  
  
 4)NOTE: NOTE #4 NO, THIS WAS NOT DONE.
 PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW.
  
 ** PREVIOUS NOTE **
 PLEASE SEE BLDG COMMENTS, ALL DETAILS
 SHALL CONTAIN THE PRINTED NAME AND
 SIGNATURE OF ALL PERSON RESPONESIBLE
 FOR SUCH PLANS/DESIGN.
 FBC ADMIN SECTION, 104.2.1
  
 ************************************
 NEW NOTE(S).
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW PLANS SUBMITTED
 WHICH ARE PHOTO-COPIES OF PLANS WHICH
 ARE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY AN
 ENGINEER. PLEASE KNOW, ALL COPIES
 SUBMITTED SHALL BE ORIGINAL WITH RAISED
 SEAL, WET SIGNATURE AND DATE. FAC
 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW PLAN SUBMITTED
 NOW APPEAR TO SHOW THE "GRAND BANK"
 DETACHED FROM THE MAIN BLGD?
 PLEASE CLARIFY THIS SHOWN ON PLANS.
 PLEASE VERIFY IF THIS IS INDEED THE
 CASE, PLEASE INDICATE THE DISCONNECTING
 MEANS REQUIRED OR IF THE EXISTING
 PANEL(NOT LABLED) AND EXIST A/C PANEL
 CONTAIN MCB'S.
 THIS NOTE IS ONLY BASED ON NEW PLANS
 SUBMITTED AS THE SURVEY/SITE PLANS DO
 NOT CORRELATE WITH THIS PLAN AND
 INDICATES ONLY ONE BLDG AND NOT BEING
 DETACHED.
 PLEASE VERIFY.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW, PER FS
 553.80(2)(B), WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT
 COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE
 KNOW, IF PLANS COME BACK WITH OUT "ANY"
 OF THE SAME CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS
 BEING ADDRESSED, A 4X FEE SHALL BE
 ACCESSED FOR THE PLAN REVIEW PORTION
 (30%X4) OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE.
 IT IS RECOMMENDED A MEETING BE HELD OR
 AT A MININUM A PHONE CONVERSTAION BE
 HELD TO GO OVER ANY QUESTIONS, OR
 COMMENTS.
  
  
 PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE NOTES FROM OTHER
 REIVEWERS WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL
 PLANS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING
 THIS OFFICE.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
2006-04-26 00:00:00IN ELEC FOR REVIEW


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved